ANJALI PANDIT, MUMBAI V. PR CIT 31, MUMBAI

ITA 4443/MUM/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 128 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1346 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 9 month(s) 14 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 11-04-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 27-06-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RAJESH KUMAR YADAV
• Assessee Lawyers: JIGNESH R SHAH
• Section: 263

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES A, MUMBAI , , , BEFORE SHRI JOGINDER SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJENDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.4443/MUM /2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR-2011-12 ANJALI PANDIT, 8178, GAJANAND BUILDING, JAWAHAR NAGAR, GOREGAON(W), MUMBAI-400062 / VS. PR. CIT-31, ROOM NO.301, 03 RD FLOOR, C-13 BKC, BANDRA (EAST), MUMBAI-400051 P AN NO. AFUPP3435R ( / ASSESSEE) ( / REVENUE) / ASSESSEE BY SHRI JIGNESH R. SHAH / REVENUE BY SHRI RAJESH KUMAR YADAV- DR / DATE OF HEARING : 11/04/2017 / DATE OF ORDER: 11/04/2017 ITA NO.4443/MUM/2016 ANJALI PANDIT 2 / O R D E R PER JOGINDER SINGH (JUDICIAL MEMBER) THE ASSESSEE IS AGGRIEVED BY THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21/03/2013 OF THE LD. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INC OME TAX, MUMBAI, INVOKING REVISIOINAL JURISDICTION A U/ S 263 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER THE ACT) W ITHOUT ASSIGNING ANY VALID REASON AS THE ASSESSMENT ORDER WAS NEITHER ERRONEOUS NOR PREJUDICIAL TO THE INTEREST O F THE REVENUE. 2. DURING HEARING, SHRI JIGNESH R. SHAH, LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT PURSUANT TO THE DIRECTION OF THE LD. PR.CIT, THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREA DY GOT THE DESIRED RELIEF, THEREFORE, DID NOT PRESS THE AP PEAL FILED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. IT WAS CONTENDED THAT THE ASS ESSEE MAY BE PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. SHRI RAJES H KUMAR YADAV, LD. DR, HAD NO OBJECTION, IF THE ASSES SEE MAY BE PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL, FILED BY T HE ASSESSEE. 2.1. WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. SINCE, TH E ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY GOT THE DESIRED RELIEF AND NOT INTERESTED TO PURSUE THE APPEAL, THEREFORE, THE APP EAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ITA NO.4443/MUM/2016 ANJALI PANDIT 3 FINALLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. THIS ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN IN THE PRESENCE OF LD. REPRESENTATIVES FROM BOTH SIDES AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING ON 11/04/2017. SD/- SD/- (RAJENDRA) (JOGINDER SINGH) '# / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER $# / JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI; # DATED : 11/04/2016 F{X~{T? P.S/. . . %$&'()(*& / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. %& '( / THE APPELLANT (RESPECTIVE ASSESSEE) 2. )*'( / THE RESPONDENT. 3. + + , ( %& ) / THE CIT, MUMBAI. 4. + + , / CIT(A)- , MUMBAI, 5. /01 )2 , + %& %23 , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. 14 5 / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER, */& ) //TRUE COPY// / (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI