RAMA NEWSPRINT AND PAPERS LIMITED (NOW KNOWN AS SHREE RAMA NEWPRINT LTE), MUMBAI V. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3(3, MUMBAI

ITA 4460/MUM/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 104 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6671 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 4 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-12-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 11-07-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

आयकर अपील य अ धकरण म ु ंबई पीठ “ डी ” ी वकास अव थी, या यक सद य के सम एवं ी अमरजीत संह , लेखा सद य के सम IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “D”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER. आअसं. 4460/म ु ं/2018 ( न.व.2010-11) ITA NO. 4460/MUM/2018 (A.Y.2010-11) M/s. Rama Newsprint & Papers Ltd. (Now known as ‘Shree Rama Newsprint Ltd.) 2 nd Floor, Shreeniwas House, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Fort, Mumbai -400 001. PAN: AAACR-2499-H बनाम/ Vs. : अपीलाथ / Appellant The ACIT, Cir.3(3), 6 th Floor, Aaykar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Mumbai 400 020 : थ / Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Pankaj Kumar ,Sr.AR-CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of Hearing : 09/12/2021 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 09/12/2021 आदेश/ ORDER PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-8 Mumbai [ in short ‘the CIT(A)’] dated 17/04/2018 for the Assessment Year 2010-11. 2 ITA NO. 4460/MUM/2018 (A.Y.2010-11) 2. A perusal of the appeal file shows that this appeal was filed in July 2018. The appeal was listed for hearing for the first time on 04/09/2019. The notice was issued to the assessee/appellant through RPAD on the address mentioned in Form-36. Thereafter, repeated notices were sent to the assessee through RPAD on the address furnished by the assessee. Despite repeated notices none appeared to represent the assessee nor any letter seeking adjournment on any of the dates of hearing was ever received. It seems that the assessee is not keen to prosecute the appeal, hence, this appeal is taken up for hearing with the assistance of ld. Departmental Representative and the material available on record. 3. Shri Pankaj Kumar representing the Department vehemently defended the impugned order and prayed for dismissing the appeal. 4. We have heard the submissions made by ld. Departmental Representative and have examined the orders of authorities below. In the absence of any material controverting the findings of First Appellate Authority, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order. Hence, the impugned order is upheld and appeal by the assessee is dismissed. 5. In the result, appeal by the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on Thursday the 9 th day of December, 2021. Sd/- Sd/- (AMARJIT SINGH) (VIKAS AWASTHY) लेखा सद य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER या यक सद य/JUDICIAL MEMBER म ु ंबई/ Mumbai, दनांक/Dated: 09/12/2021 Vm, Sr. PS(O/S) 3 ITA NO. 4460/MUM/2018 (A.Y.2010-11) त ल प अ े षतCopy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ /The Appellant , 2. तवाद / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आय ु त(अ)/ The CIT(A)- 4. आयकर आय ु त CIT 5. वभागीय त न ध, आय.अपी.अ ध., म ु बंई/DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गाड फाइल/Guard file. BY ORDER, //True Copy// (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai