1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES: F , NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SMT. BEENA A PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 4479 /DEL/201 4 A.Y. 20 08 - 09 RAM DEV RICE PVT.LTD. C/O OP SAPRA & ASSOCIATES ADVOCATES CIT(A) 763, NEW FRIENDS COLONY NEW DELHI 110 025 PAN: AACCR 7125 A VS. ACIT, KARNAL CIRCLE KARNAL (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SHRI ATIQ AHMAD, SR.D.R DATE OF HEARING 21 ST NOVEMBER, 2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 21 ST NOVEMBER, 2017 ORDER PER BEENA A PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A), KARNAL DATED 11.12.2013 FOR THE A.Y. 20 08 - 09 . NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL DESPITE ISSUE OF NOTICE THROUGH REGISTERED POST. IT A PPEARS THAT ASSESSEE IS NO MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS UN - ADMITTED. 2. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FOLLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.); HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE 2 TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND ALSO THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477 - 478) WHEREIN THEIR LORDSHIPS HELD THAT THE APPEAL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILING OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFFECTIVELY PURSUING THE SAME, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED AS UN - ADMITTED. 3. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 21 ST NOVEMBER, 2017. SD/ - SD / - (R.S. SYAL) (BEENA A PILLAI) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 21 ST NOVEMBER, 2017. *MV COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RE SPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASST. REGISTRAR ITAT, DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI