IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES SMC : DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA.NO.45/DEL./2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 SHRI ASHOK KUMAR, S/O. SHADI LAL R/O. 106/15, ANAND VIHAR, NEAR ROADWAYS BUS STAND, BULANDSHAHR (U.P.) PAN AQXPK3400H VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), BULANDSHAHR. (APP ELLANT ) (RESPONDENT) FOR ASSESSEE : -NONE- FOR REVENUE : SHRI S.L. ANURAGI, SR. D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 09 .0 7 .2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 09 .0 7 .2018 ORDER THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A), ALIGADH, DATED 30.10.2 017, FOR THE A.Y. 2009-2010. 2. THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN NOTIFIED THE DATE OF HEARING THROUGH REGISTERED POST. HOWEVER, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. IT, THEREFORE, APPEARS THAT ASSESSEE IS NO MORE 2 ITA.NO.45/DEL./2018 SHRI ASHOK KUMAR, BULANDSHAHR, U.P. INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, TH E APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS UN-ADMITTED. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FO LLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN CLUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.); HO NBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF E STATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND ALSO THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE C ASE OF CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477-478) WHEREIN THEIR LORDSHIPS HELD THAT THE APPE AL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILING OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFF ECTIVELY PURSUING THE SAME, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED AS UN-ADMITTED. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMIS SED. 3 ITA.NO.45/DEL./2018 SHRI ASHOK KUMAR, BULANDSHAHR, U.P. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. SD/- (BHAVNESH SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER DELHI, DATED 09 TH JULY, 2018 VBP/- COPY TO 1. THE APP ELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) CONCERNED 4. CIT CONCERNED 5. D.R. ITAT SMC BENCH, DELHI 6. GUARD FILE. // BY ORDER // ASSISTANT REGISTRAR : ITAT DELHI BENCHES : DELHI.