M/s. Ganna Vikas Parishad, Morna, Muzaffarnagar V. ACIT, Muzaffarnagar

ITA 4507/DEL/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 126 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3921 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 5 month(s) 2 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 17-01-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 09-05-2017
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 14-08-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: S R SENAPATI

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES C : DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA.NO.4507/DEL./2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-2011 GANNA VIKAS PARISHAD, MORNA VILLAGE & P.O. MORNA, DIST. MUZAFFARNAGAR (U.P). PAN AAAJG1376Q VS. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1, MUZAFFARNAGAR. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) FOR ASSESSEE : - NONE - FOR REVENUE : SHRI S.R. SENAPATI, SR. D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 17.01.2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 17 .01.2018 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A), MUZAFFARNAGAR, DATED 31.03.2014, FOR THE A.Y. 2010-2011. 2. IN THIS APPEAL, DESPITE NOTIFYING THE DATE OF H EARING THROUGH POST, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. IT, THEREFORE, APPEARS THAT ASSESSEE IS NO MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS UN-ADMITTED. 2 ITA.NO.4507/DEL./2014 GANNA VIKAS PARISHAD, MORNA V & PO MORNA, DIST. MUZAFFARNAGAR. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FOLLOWING V ARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF MULTI PLAN INDIA LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.); HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT D ECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND ALSO THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE O F CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477-47 8) WHEREIN THEIR LORDSHIPS HELD THAT THE APPEAL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILING OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFFECTIVELY PURSUING THE SAME, THE AP PEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS UN-ADMITTED. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMIS SED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. SD/- SD/- (L.P. SAHU) (BHAVNESH SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DELHI, DATED 17 TH JANUARY, 2018 VBP/- COPY TO 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) CONCERNED 4. CIT CONCERNED 5. D.R. ITAT C BENCH, DELHI 6. GUARD FILE. // BY ORDER // ASST. REGISTRAR : ITAT DELHI BENCHES : DELHI.