Shivani Goel, New Delhi V. ITO, New Delhi

ITA 4615/DEL/2009

• Counselvise Citation: [2010] 136 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8116 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-02-2010
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Assessment Year: 2004-2005
• Appeal Filed On: 07-12-2009
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: KISHORE B

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH G : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A.NO. 4615/DEL/2009 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2004-05 SHIVANI GOEL, C-3/47, ASHOK VIHAR PHASE II, NEW DELHI. PAN : AETPG5180J VS. ITO, WARD 19(2), D-216, VIKAS BHAWAN, IP ESTATE, NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI KISHORE B., SR.DR O R D E R PER I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. IT IS DI RECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A), DATED 15 TH SEPTEMBER, 2009 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSE E. HOWEVER, ON THE FIXED DATE OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF TH E ASSESSEE. IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE PRESUME THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING HER APPEAL. CONSIDERING THESE FACTS AN D KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE ITAT RULES AS WERE CONSIDERED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 3 8 ITD 320 (DEL) AND M.P.HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKA R 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UNADMITTED. 2 2. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. 3. THE ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 08.02. 2010. [G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA] [I.P. BANSAL] VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 12.02.2010. DK COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ITAT, DELHI BENCHES