The Kerala State Co-op Coir Marketing Federation Ltd, Alappuzha V. The ACIT, Circle-1, , Alappuzha

ITA 464/COCH/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 119 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1493 (ITAT-COCHIN)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 18 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 27-11-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 09-10-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A S BINDHU
• Assessee Lawyers: R KRISHNAN

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJAR I, AM & SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, JM ITA NO. 464 /COCH/201 8 : ASST.YEAR 201 3 - 201 4 M/S. THE KERALA STATE CO - OPERATIVE COIR MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED NEAR NORTH POLICE STATION ALAPPUZHA - 688 012. PAN : AADAT6621Q . VS. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX, CIRCLE 1 ALAPPUZHA. ( APPLICANT ) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SRI.R. KRISHNAN RESPONDENT BY : SMT.A.S.BINDHU, SR.DR DATE OF HEARING : 27 .1 1 .2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 27 .1 1 .2018 O R D E R PER GEORGE GEORGE K., JM THIS APPEAL AT THE INSTANCE OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST CIT(A)S ORDER DATED 25.07 .2018. THE RELEVANT ASSESSMENT YEAR IS 201 3 - 201 4 . 2. THE SOLITARY ISSUE FOR CONSIDERATION IS WHETHER THE CIT(A) IS JUSTIFIED IN CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER, WHEREIN BELATED REMITTANCE OF EMPLOYEES CONTRIBUTION TO EPF AND ESI U/S 36(1)(VA) OF THE I.T.ACT. 3. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE ARE AS FOLLOWS: - THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAD DISALLOWED A SUM OF RS. 58,98,073 , BEING EMPLOYEES CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS ESI & PF SINCE THE PAYMENT WAS NOT MADE WITHIN THE DUE DATE SPECIFIED IN THE RESPECTIVE STATUTES. THE RELEVANT OBSERVATION OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER READS AS F OLLOWS: - ITA NO. 464 /COCH/2018 . M/S. THE KERALA STATE CO - OP COIR MKTG.FED.LTD. 2 5.1 ON PERUSAL OF THE FORM 3CD, IT IS NOTICED THAT THE CONTRIBUTIONS COLLECTED FROM THE EMPLOYEES TOWARDS PROVIDENT FUND AND ESI WAS PAID TO THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS AFTER THE DUE DATE AS SPECIFIED U/S 36(1)(VA). HENCE THE TOTAL OF THESE PAYMENTS RS.58,98,073/ - (PF - RS.53,77,257/ - ; ESI RS.5,20,816/ - ) IS TO BE ADDED BACK TO THE TOTAL INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. THE DUE DATE FOR PF PAYMENT IS 20 TH OF EVERY MONTH AND ESI PAYMENT IS 21 ST OF EVERY MONTH. NORMALLY AN ASSESSEE GETS A GRACE PERIOD OF 5 DAY S FOR MAKING THE PAYMENT. RELIANCE IS PLACED ON THE DECISION OF THE KERALA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX COCHIN V. MERCHEM LTD. REPORTED IN [(2015) 61 TAXMANN.COM 119 (KERALA). SO AN ADDITION OF RS.58,98,073/ - IS MADE TO THE TOTAL IN COME OF THE ASSESSEE. 4. AGGRIEVED BY THE CONFIRMATION OF DISALLOWANCE, THE ASSESSEE PREFERRED AN APPEAL BEFORE THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY. THE CIT(A) FOLLOWING THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MERCHEM LIMITE D [(2015) 378 ITR 443 (KER.)] , DISMISSED THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE. 5. THE ASSESSEE BEING AGGRIEVED BY THE CIT(A)S ORDER, HAS FILED THE PRESENT APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. THE LEARNED AR SUBMITTED THAT THE EMPLOYEES CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED BY THE ASSESS EE WERE PAID BEFORE THE DATE OF THE FILING OF THE RETURN, AND HENCE, WAS AN ALLOWABLE DEDUCTION. THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, ON THE OTHER HAND, SUBMITTED THAT THE ISSUE IN QUESTION IS SQUARELY COVERED IN FAVOUR OF THE REVENUE BY THE JUDGMENT O F THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF MERCHEM LIMITED (SUPRA). 6. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF MERCHEM LIMITED (SUPRA) HAD CATEGORICALLY HELD ITA NO. 464 /COCH/2018 . M/S. THE KERALA STATE CO - OP COIR MKTG.FED.LTD. 3 THAT EMPLOYEES CONTRIBUTION TO PF AND ESI, IF NOT PAID WITHIN THE DUE DATE MENTIONED IN THE RESPECTIVE STATUTE CANNOT BE ALLOWED AS A DEDUCTION U/S 36(1)(VA) OF THE I.T.ACT. THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF MERCHEM LIMITED (SUPRA) HAD CONSIDERED THE JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENTS ON THE ISSUE AND HAD TAKEN A DECISION IN FAVOUR OF THE REVENUE (INCLUDING THE HONBLE APEX COURT JUDGMENT RELIED ON BY THE ASSESSEE IN ITS GROUNDS OF APPEAL BEFORE US) . THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF MERCHEM LIMITED (SUPRA) WAS FOLLOWED BY THE RECENT JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE KERALA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ALLIAZ CORHILL INFORMATION SERVICES (P) LTD. V. DCIT [(2018) 406 ITR 150 (KER .)] . IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENT OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT, WE HOLD THAT THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS CORRECTLY DISALLOWED THE SUM OF RS. 58,98,073 . THEREFORE, THE CIT(A)S ORDER CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DOES NOT REQUIRE A NY INTERFERENCE AND THE SAME IS UPHELD. IT IS ORDERED ACCORDINGLY. 7. IN THE RESULT, ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 27 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER , 2018 . SD/ - SD/ - ( CHANDRA POOJARI ) ( GEORGE GEORGE K ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER COCHIN ; DATED : 27 TH NOVEMBER , 2018 . DEVDAS* ITA NO. 464 /COCH/2018 . M/S. THE KERALA STATE CO - OP COIR MKTG.FED.LTD. 4 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER, (ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, COCHIN 1. THE APPLICANT. 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT (A) - KOTTAYAM 4. THE PR. CIT , KOTTAYAM. 5. DR, ITAT, COCHIN 6. GUARD FILE.