Rajeev Mehta, New Delhi V. ITO WARD 46(3), New Delhi

ITA 4646/DEL/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8157 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 10 month(s) 3 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-03-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Appeal Filed On: 22-05-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI DELHI DELHI BENCH BENCH BENCH BENCH A AA A : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ,, , VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SHRI SHRI SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO ITA NO ITA NO ITA NO . .. . 4646 4646 4646 4646 /DEL/20 /DEL/20 /DEL/20 /DEL/20 1 11 1 9 99 9 ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2 : 2: 2 : 2 0 00 0 1 11 1 5 55 5 - -- - 16 1616 16 SHRI RAJEEV MEHTA, SHRI RAJEEV MEHTA, SHRI RAJEEV MEHTA, SHRI RAJEEV MEHTA, 14 1414 147, KALYAN VIHAR, 7, KALYAN VIHAR, 7, KALYAN VIHAR, 7, KALYAN VIHAR, NEAR POLO ROAD, NEAR POLO ROAD, NEAR POLO ROAD, NEAR POLO ROAD, DELHI DELHI DELHI DELHI 110 009. 110 009. 110 009. 110 009. PAN : ACHPM7874K. PAN : ACHPM7874K. PAN : ACHPM7874K. PAN : ACHPM7874K. VS. VS. VS. VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD WARD WARD WARD- -- -46(3), 46(3), 46(3), 46(3), NEW DELHI. NEW DELHI. NEW DELHI. NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE. RESPONDENT BY : SHRI M. BARANWAL, SENIOR DR. DATE OF HEARING : 25 2525 25.03 .03.03 .03.2021 .2021 .2021 .2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 25 2525 25.03 .03.03 .03. .. .2021 2021 2021 2021 ORDER ORDER ORDER ORDER PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP VPVP VP : :: : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEA R 2015-16 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A)-12, NE W DELHI DATED 26 TH FEBRUARY, 2019. 2. NOBODY APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE TIME OF VIRTUAL HEARING BEFORE US. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASS ESSEE, VIDE LETTER DATED NIL HAS INTIMATED THE TRIBUNAL THAT THE ASSES SEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 (IN SHORT THE ACT) AND REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE SAID APPEAL. 3. CONSIDERING THE AFORESAID SITUATION, THE CAPTION ED APPEAL IS CONSIGNED TO RECORDS AND TREATED AS DISMISSED. ITA-4646/DEL/2019 2 4. HOWEVER, THE AFORESAID IS SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT TH AT IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARREARS FOR THE CAPTIONED A SSESSMENT YEAR IS NOT ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE AFORESTATED ACT , THE APPELLANT (I.E., THE ASSESSEE) SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE T RIBUNAL FOR REINSTITUTION OF THE APPEAL AND THE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER SUCH APPLICATION APPROPRIATELY AS PER LAW. THE RESPONDEN T (I.E., THE REVENUE) HAS NO OBJECTION WITH REGARD TO THE AFORES AID CAVEAT. 5. IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID, THE APPEAL IS CONSIGNE D TO RECORD AND, FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, IS TREATED AS DISMISSED. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTU AL HEARING ON 25 TH MARCH, 2021. SD/- SD/- ( (( ( SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA ) )) ) (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU ) )) ) JUDICIAL JUDICIAL JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VK. COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR