Radhe Shyam Prop, Rohtak V. ITO, Rohtak

ITA 4668/DEL/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2013] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 69614 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 28 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 22-11-2013
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Next Hearing Date: 22-01-2014
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 24-10-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI U. B. S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI J. S. REDDY , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 4668 /DEL/2011 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09) RADHEY SHYAM PROP., VS. ITO, WARD 1, SURYA BUILDERS, ROHTAK 227-B, MODEL TOWN, ROHTAK PAN/GIR NO.: ABAPS1817L (APPELLANTS) (RESPONDENTS) ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY: MS. MEENAKSHI VOHRA, SR. DR ORDER PER U B S BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER: THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE EMANATES FROM THE ORDE R PASSED BY LD. CIT(A) ROHTAK DATED 26.08.2011 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09. 2. DESPITE SENDING NOTICE OF HEARING SUFFICIENTLY I N ADVANCE, NEITHER ANY BODY ATTENDED AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF APPEAL NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT HAD BEEN RECEIVED. IT IS THUS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF THIS APPEAL. 3. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FO LLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCHES OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDIN G THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD.; 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) AND HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURTS I.T.A. NO. 4668/DEL/2011 2 DECISION IN ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UNADMITTED AND DISMISS THE SAME IN LIMINI. 2. AS A RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSE D. 3. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT SOON AFTER CONCL USION OF HEARING ON 22 ND JAN., 2014. SD./- SD./- (J. S. REDDY) (U.B.S.BEDI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATE: 22 ND JAN., 2014. SP. COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A)-XXV, NEW DELHI AR, ITAT, 5. CIT(ITAT), NEW DELHI NEW DELHI