The iTO, Wd-5, Palakkad V. M/s.The Ayalur Service Co-op Bank Ltd, Palakkad

ITA 467/COCH/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 116 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5998 (ITAT-COCHIN)
• Duration Of Justice: 12 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-08-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 19-07-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A S BINDHU
• Assessee Lawyers: AMALJITH P J
• Keywords: Competent authority; TDS; Set aside
• Section: 40(a)(ia); 80P

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJAR I, AM & SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, JM ITA NO. 467 /COCH/201 8 : ASST.YEAR 201 3 - 201 4 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 5 PALAKKAD. VS. M/S. KUTHANNUR SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KUTHANNUR P.O. PALAKKAD 678 721 . PAN : AAAAK1516G . (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ITA NO. 468 /COCH/201 8 : ASST.YEAR 2013 - 2014 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 5 PALAKKAD. VS. M/S.PERINGOTUKKURISSI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.P.519 PARUTHIPULLY P.O. PALAKKAD 678 622. PAN : AADAT9601J. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ITA NO. 469 /COCH/201 8 : ASST.YEAR 2010 - 2011 ITA NO. 470 /COCH/201 8 : ASST.YEAR 2013 - 2014 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 5 PALAKKAD. VS. M/S.VADAKKENCHERY SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.F.1219 VADAKKENCHERY P.O. PALAKKAD 679 552. PAN : AAEFV0382N. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SMT.A.S.BINDHU, SR.DR RESPONDENTS BY : SRI.AMALJITH P.J., CA DATE OF HEARING : 24 .07.2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 01.08 .2019 O R D E R PER GEORGE GEORGE K, JM : THESE APPEALS WERE ORIGINALLY DISPOSED OFF BY THE ITAT VIDE ITS CONSOLIDATED ORDER DATED 29.11.2018. THE REVENUE FILED ITA NO. 467 /COCH /201 8 & ORS. M/S. KUTHANNUR SCB LTD . & ORS. 2 MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ITAT TO RECALL ITS CONS OLIDATED ORDER DATED 29.11.2018 (MA NOS.42/COCH/2019 TO 45/COCH/2019 ) IN VIEW OF THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE KERALA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT [ITA NO.97/2016 ORDER DATED 19 TH MARCH, 2019]. THE ITAT VID E ITS ORDER DATED 15.07.2019 IN MA NOS.42 TO 45/COCH/2019 RECALLED ITS EARLIER ORDER DATED 29.11.2018 AND POSTED THE SAME FOR HEARING. IN PURSUANT TO THE ITATS ORDER DATED 15.07.2019 IN MA NOS.42 TO 45/COCH/2019, THE ABOVE APPEALS ARE BEING DISPOSED OFF. 2. TWO ISSUES ARE RAISED IN THESE APPEAL (I) WHETHER THE ASSESSEE S ARE ENTITLED TO DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT? AND (II) WHETHER DISALLOWANCE OF INTEREST PAYMENT BY INVOKING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 40(A)(IA) OF THE I.T.ACT, IS CORRECT? 3. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE ARE AS FOLLOWS: THE ASSESSEE S IN THESE CASE S ARE REGISTERED AS CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES UNDER THE KERALA STATE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969. THE ASSESSMENT S WERE COMPLETED IN ASSESSEE S CASE BY DENYING DEDUCTION CLAIMED U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. THE ASSESSING OFFICER FOR DENYING THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT, TREATED THE ASSESSEE S AS CO - OPERATIVE BANK S AND NOT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES . 4. AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSMENT S , THE ASSESSEE S FILED APPEAL S BEFORE THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY. THE CIT(A) BY ITA NO. 467 /COCH /201 8 & ORS. M/S. KUTHANNUR SCB LTD . & ORS. 3 FOLLOWING THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. (384 ITR 490) ALLOWED THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. 5. AGGRIEVED BY THE ORD ER S OF THE CIT(A), THE DEPARTMENT HAS FILED THE PRESENT APPEAL S BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. SINCE IDENTICAL GROUNDS, EXCEPT VARIANCE IN FIGURES, ARE RAISED IN THESE APPEALS, THE GROUNDS RAISED IN ITA NO.467/COCH/2018 IN THE CASE OF M/S.KUTHANNUR SERVICE CO - OPERAT IVE BANK LTD. IS REPRODUCED AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), THRISSUR IN ITA NO. 638 / 20 16 - 17 DATED 31.07.2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 201 3 - 1 4 IS ERRONEOUS IN LAW, FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. 2. THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX (APPEALS) HAS ERRED IN DELETING THE DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION OF RS. 41,62,497 / - CLAIMED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER SECTION 80P(2) (A) (I) OF THE ACT. 3. THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX (APPEALS) OUGHT TO HAVE APPRECIAT ED THE FACT THAT THE HON. JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CSE OF M./S.PERINTHALMANNA SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK (363 ITR 268) WHGEREIN IT HAS BEEN HELD THAT WITH THE INTRODUCTION OF SECTION 80P(4) OF THE ACT, DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) CANNOT BE ALLOWED MERELY O N THE STRENGTH OF CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION AS PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY. 4 . THE LEARNED CIT (APPEALS) OUGHT TO HAVE SEEN THAT THE HON. SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF SABARKHANTA ZILLA KHARID VECHAN SANGH LTD. VS. CLT REPORTED IN 203 ITR 1027 (SC) HAD HELD THAT ELIGIBLE DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 IN RESPECT OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES / BANKS DOING BOTH AGRICULTURAL AND NON - AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES SHOULD NOT BE 100% OF THE GROSS PROFITS OF SUCH SOCIETIES ETC. BUT SHO ULD BE LIMITED TO THE PROFITS GENERATED FROM AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES ALONE PERFORMED BY SUCH ASSESSEES. 5 . THE LEARNED CIT (APPEALS) OUGHT TO HAVE SEEN THAT THE ABOVE DECISION OF THE HON. APEX COURT IS IN SHARP CONTRAST TO THE DECISION OF THE HON. HIGH CO URT OF KERALA IN THE CASE OF M/S ITA NO. 467 /COCH /201 8 & ORS. M/S. KUTHANNUR SCB LTD . & ORS. 4 CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK & OTHERS IN ITA NO.212 OF 2013, THAT HELD THAT THE AUTHORITIES UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT CANNOT PROBE INTO QUESTION WHETHER THE ASSESSEE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY IS A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDI T SOCIETY', ONCE IT IS REGISTERED AND CLASSIFIED AS 'PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY' BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE KERALA COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969. 6 . THE LEARNED CIT (APPEALS) OUGHT TO HAVE CONSIDERED THE REFERENC E ORDER OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA TO A LARGER BENCH IN ITA NOS.97 OF 2016 DATED 09.07.2018 IN VIEW OF TWO CONFLICTING DECISIONS OF THE TWO SEPARATE BENCHES OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN THE CASES OF M/S CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK & OTHERS AND M/S.PERINTHALMANNA SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK. 7 . THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX (APPEALS) HAS ERRED IN DELETING THE DISALLOWANCE OF RS. 2,16,39,313 / - IN RESPECT OF INTEREST PAID TO THE DEPOSITORS. 8 . THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS RIGHTLY DISALLOWED THE INTEREST PAID TO THE DEPOSITORS INVOKING SECTION 40(A)(IA) OF THE I.T.ACT., SINCE THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT DEDUCTED TDS FROM THE INTEREST PAYMENT OF RS.10,000/ - AND MORE TO THE DEPOSITORS. 9 . FOR THESE AND OTHER GROUNDS THAT MAY BE URGED AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE ORDER OF THE CIT (A) MAY BE SET ASIDE AND THAT OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER BE RESTORED. 10 . THE APPELLANT CRAVES LEAVE TO ADD OR AMEND ANY GROUND OF APPEAL BEFORE IT IS FINALLY DISPOSED OFF. 6. THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE RELIED ON THE GROUNDS RAISED IN THE APPEAL S . FURTHER, THE LEARNED DR PLACED RELIANCE ON THE LATEST JUDGMENT OF THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT [ITA N O.97/2016 ORDER DATED 19 TH MARCH, 2019] . THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE S , ON THE OTHER HAND, SUPPORTED THE ORDER S OF THE CIT(A). 7. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE ITA NO. 467 /COCH /201 8 & ORS. M/S. KUTHANNUR SCB LTD . & ORS. 5 JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. (SUPRA) HELD THAT THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CONDUCT AN INQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY TO DETERMINE THE ELIGIBILITY OF DEDUCTION U/S 8 0P OF THE I.T.ACT. IT WAS HELD BY THE HONBLE HIGH COURT THAT THE ASSESSING OFFICER IS NOT BOUND BY THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY CLASSIFYING THE ASSESSEE - SOCIETY AS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY. THE HONBLE HIGH COURT HELD THAT EACH ASSESSMENT YEAR IS SEPARATE AND ELIGIBILITY SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER FOR EACH OF THE ASSESSMENT YEARS. THE FINDING OF THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT READS AS FOLLOWS: - 33. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DO WN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY [397 ITR 1] IT CANNOT BE CONTENDED THAT, WHILE CONSIDERING THE CLAIM MADE BY AN ASSESSEE SOCIETY FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, THE ASSE SSING OFFICER HAS TO EXTEND THE BENEFITS AVAILABLE, MERELY LOOKING AT THE CLASS OF THE SOCIETY AS PER THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION ISSUED UNDER THE CENTRAL OR STATE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT AND THE RULES MADE THEREUNDER. ON SUCH A CLAIM FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CONDUCT AN ENQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY AND ARRIVE AT A CONCLUSION WHETHER BENEFITS CAN BE EXTENDED OR NOT IN THE LIGHT OF THE PROVISIONS UNDER SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P. 33. IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] THE DIVISION BENCH HELD THAT THE APPELLANT SOCIETIES HAVING BEEN CLASSIFIED AS PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE KCS ACT, IT HAS NECESSARILY TO BE HELD THAT THE PRINCIPAL OBJECT OF SUCH SO CIETIES IS TO UNDERTAKE AGRICULTURAL CREDIT ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE LOANS AND ADVANCES FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES, THE RATE OF INTEREST ON SUCH LOANS AND ADVANCES TO BE AT THE RATE TO BE FIXED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES UNDER THE KCS ACT A ND HAVING ITS AREA OF OPERATION CONFINED TO A VILLAGE, PANCHAYAT OR A MUNICIPALITY AND AS SUCH, THEY ARE ENTITLED FOR THE BENEFIT OF SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT TO EASE THEMSELVES OUT FROM THE ITA NO. 467 /COCH /201 8 & ORS. M/S. KUTHANNUR SCB LTD . & ORS. 6 COVERAGE OF SECTION 80P AND THAT, THE AUTHORIT IES UNDER THE IT ACT CANNOT PROBE INTO ANY ISSUES OR SUCH MATTERS RELATING TO SUCH SOCIETIES AND THAT, PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES REGISTERED AS SUCH UNDER THE KCS ACT AND CLASSIFIED SO, UNDER THE ACT, INCLUDING THE APPELLANTS ARE ENTITLED TO SUC H EXEMPTION. 34. IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] THE DIVISION BENCH EXPRESSED A DIVERGENT OPINION, WITHOUT NOTICING THE LAW LAID DOWN IN ANTONY PATTUKULANGARA [2012 (3) KHC 726] AND PERINTHALMANNA [363 ITR 268]. MOREOVER, THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE DIVISION BEN CH IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] IS NOT GOOD LAW, SINCE, IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY [397 ITR 1], ON A CLAIM FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, BY REASON OF SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, THE AS SESSING OFFICER HAS TO CONDUCT AN ENQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY AND ARRIVE AT A CONCLUSION WHETHER BENEFITS CAN BE EXTENDED OR NOT IN THE LIGHT OF THE PROVISIONS UNDER SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY [397 ITR 1] THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE DIVISION BENCH PERINTHALMANNA [363 ITR 268] HAS TO BE AFFIRMED AND WE DO SO. 35. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN ACE MULTI AXES SYSTEMS CASE (SUPRA), SINCE EACH ASSESSMENT YEAR IS A SEPARATE UNIT, THE INTENTION OF THE LEGISLATURE IS IN NO MANNER DEFEATED BY NOT ALLOWING DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, BY REASON OF SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, IF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY CEASES TO BE THE SPECIFIED CLASS OF SOCIETIES FOR WHICH THE DEDUCTION IS PROVIDED, EVEN IF IT WAS ELIGIBLE IN THE INITIAL YEARS. 7.1 IN VIEW OF THE DICTUM LAID DOWN BY THE FULL BENCH OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT, THE ISSUE OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) IS RESTORED TO THE ASSESSING OFFICER. THE ASSESSING OFFICER SHALL EXAMINE THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE S AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE ACTIVITIES ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACTIVITIES OF A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY FUNCTIONING UNDER THE KERALA CO - OPER ATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969 AND GRANT DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. IT IS ORDERED ACCORDINGLY. ITA NO. 467 /COCH /201 8 & ORS. M/S. KUTHANNUR SCB LTD . & ORS. 7 8. AS REGARDS THE DISALLOWANCE U/S 40(A)(IA) OF THE I.T.ACT BEING INTEREST PAYMENTS ON DEPOSITS FOR NOT DEDUCTING TAX AT SOURCE, WE ARE OF THE VIE W THAT THE ISSUE NEEDS TO BE RESTORED TO THE ASSESSING OFFICER FOR FRESH CONSIDERATION IN THE LIGHT OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. (SUPRA). THE A.O. SHALL EXAMINE WHE THER THE ASSESSEE S WERE NOT LIABLE TO DEDUCT TAX AT SOURCE BY VIRTUE OF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 194A(3)(V) OF THE I.T.ACT. 9 . IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL S FILED BY THE REVENUE ARE ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 01 ST DAY OF AUGUST , 2019 . SD/ - SD/ - ( CHANDRA POOJARI ) ( GEORGE GEORGE K. ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIA L MEMBER COCHIN ; DATED : 01 ST AUGUST , 2019 . DEVDAS* COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER, (ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, COCHIN 1. THE APPELLANT S 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT (APPEALS) THRISSUR. 4. THE PR.CIT THRISSUR. 5. DR, ITAT, COCHIN 6 . GUARD FILE.