2 APPEALS BY THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AND F URTHER VIDE PARA 10 OF THE SAID CIRCULAR IT HAS BEEN CLARIFIED THAT SAID C IRCULAR IS APPLICABLE RETROSPECTIVELY TO THE PENDING APPEALS ALSO. THE H ONBLE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF PRINCIPAL CIT OF INCOME TAX VS. SURINDER KUMAR SINGHAL ITA NO 406-2016 (O&M) VIDE ORDER DATED 30.1.2017 WHILE FURTHER RELYING UPON THE DECISION O F THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. DHANALEKSHMI BANK LTD . (2015) 373 ITR 526 (SC), HAS DISMISSED THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE W ITHOUT GOING INTO THE MERITS DUE TO LOW TAX EFFECT LEAVING THE QUESTION O F LAW OPEN. IN VIEW OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 21/2015 (SUPRA) AND IN THE LI GHT OF THE ABOVE REFERRED TO DECISION OF THE HON'BLE JURISDICTIONAL PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT (SUPRA), THE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED DUE TO LOW TAX EFFECT. IT IS, HOWEVER, CLARIFIED THAT THE DISMISSAL OF THE ABOVE APPEAL SHALL NOT BE TAKEN TO BE AFFIRMATION OF THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) ON MERITS. THE LEGAL ISSUE RAISED BY THE REVENUE IS BEING LEFT OPE N TO BE ADJUDICATED IN AN APPROPRIATE CASE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. SD/- SD/- (ANNAPURNA GUPTA) (SANJAY GARG) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 03.07.2018 RKK COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT 4. THE CIT(A) 5. THE DR