METROMEX INFRASTRUCTURE P LTD, Jaipur V. ITO, Jaipur

ITA 471/JPR/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 127 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1790 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 7 month(s) 13 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 27-12-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: Not Allotted
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 14-05-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: PRATIMA KAUSHIK CIT ITA

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH FOT; IKY JKO] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH HKKXPAN] YS[KK L NL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI BHAGCHAND, A M VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 471/JP/2015 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12 M/S METROMAX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., JAIPUR CUKE VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AAGCM5139B VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 141/JP/2017 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2012-13 M/S METROMAX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., JAIPUR CUKE VS. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AAGCM5139B VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 1041/JP/2016 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14 M/S METROMAX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., JAIPUR CUKE VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AAGCM5139B VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESP ONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI AJAY MALIK (ADDL.CIT) & SMT. PRATIMA KAUSHIK (CIT) ITA NO.471/JP/2015, 141/JP/2017, 1041/JP/2016 M/S METROMAX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., JAIPUR VS. I TO 2 LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 27/12/2017 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 27/12/2017 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER BENCH: THESE THREE APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED A GAINST THREE SEPARATE ORDERS DATED 24.03.2015, 19.10.2016 & 15.0 9.2016 OF LD. CIT(A)-I, JAIPUR FOR THE A.Y. 2011-12, 2012-13 & 20 13-14 RESPECTIVELY. 2. NONE HAD APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN THIS APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING DESPITE THE DATE OF HEARING WAS DULY NOTED BY THE LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE. IT TRANSPIRES FROM THE RECORD THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN REPEATEDLY TAKING ADJOURNMENT IN THESE MATTERS. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS APPARENT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NO T INTERESTED IN PERUSING AND PROSECUTION OF THESE APPEALS. 3. SO IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES FOLLOWING THE DECISION O F DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD ., [1991] 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE M.P. HIGH COUR T IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT [1997] 22 3 ITR 480, THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE NOT ADMITTED AND ARE DI SMISSED IN LIMINE FOR NON PROSECUTION AS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 27/12/2017. ITA NO.471/JP/2015, 141/JP/2017, 1041/JP/2016 M/S METROMAX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., JAIPUR VS. I TO 3 SD/- SD/- HKKXPAN FOT; IKY JKO (BHAGCHAND) (VIJAY PAL RAO) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 27/12/2017. * GANESH KUMAR. VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- M/S METROMAX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD ., JAIPUR 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD 2(2), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE { ITA NO.471/JP/2015, 141/JP/2017,1041/JP/2016 } VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR