IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH F NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. NO.4717/DEL/2012 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2003-04 M/S RANGS TECHNOLOGIES INDIA ITO, LTD., C-161, EAST OF KAILASH, WARD-15 (2), NEW DELHI. V. NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN /GIR/NO. PAN /GIR/NO. PAN /GIR/NO. PAN /GIR/NO.AABCR AABCR AABCR AABCR- -- -6380 6380 6380 6380- -- -A AA A APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI PRISHTTA SINGEIT, SR. DR. ORDER PER TS KAPOOR, AM: THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD CIT(A) DATED 15.6.2012. 2. NOBODY ATTENDED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. ONLY A LE TTER FROM B. AGGARWAL & CO. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS PLACED BEFORE THE BENCH WHICH COULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS THE RE WAS NO POWER OF ATTORNEY IN FAVOUR OF THE C.A. FIRM. THEREFORE, WE HOLD THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL AS HAD IT B EEN SO, IT COULD HAVE GIVEN PROPER POWER OF ATTORNEY TO THE C.A. FIR M. IN VIEW OF ABOVE, RELYING ON THE DECISION OF THE I.T .A.T. IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD. REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 AND JUDGMENT OF HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTA TE OF LATE ITA NO4717/DEL/2012 2 TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR V. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE TREAT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE AS UN-ADMITTED AND DISMISS THE SAME. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISM ISSED IN LIMINE. 4. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE DATE O F HEARING I.E. 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012. SD/- SD/- (U.B.S. BEDI) (T.S. KAPOOR) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DT. 6.12.2012. HMS COPY FORWARDED TO:- 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT 4. THE CIT (A)-, NEW DELHI. 5. THE DR, ITAT, LOKNAYAK BHAWAN, KHAN MARKET, NEW DEL HI. TRUE COPY. BY ORDER (ITAT, NEW DELHI). DATE OF HEARING 6.11.2012 DATE OF DICTATION 6.11.2012 DATE OF TYPING 7.11.2012 DATE OF ORDER SIGNED BY 6.11.2012 BOTH THE MEMBERS & PRONOUNCEMENT. DATE OF ORDER UPLOADED ON NET 9.11.2012 & SENT TO THE BENCH CONCERNED.