IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 474/RJT/2012 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10) INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(4), JR, PORBANDAR VS. M/S. POOJA SHIPPING CO., 3, WADI PLOT, PORBANDAR [PAN NO. AAJFP 4848 C] (APPELLANT) .. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SHRI PRAVEEN VERMA, SR. D.R. RESPONDENT BY : SHRI CHETAN AGARWAL, A.R. DATE OF HEARING 03.09.2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 05.09.2019 O R D E R PER MS. MADHUMITA ROY JUDICIAL MEMBER: THE INSTANT APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.06.2012 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - JAMNAGAR ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 27.12.2011 PASSED BY THE ITO, WARD 2(4), PORBANDA R UNDER SECTION 144 R.W.S. 147 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED AS TO T HE ACT) FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR (A.Y.) 2009-10. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, IT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE LD.AR FOR THE ASSESSEE THAT APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS HIT BY RECENTLY ISSUED CBDT CIRCU LAR NO.17 OF 2019 DATED 08/08/2019 REVISING THE PREVIOUS THRESHOLDS PERTAINING TO TAX EFFECTS. IT IS INTER ALIA NOTICED THAT THE CBDT VIDE INSTRUCTION NO. F. NO. 279/MISC/M-93/2018-ITJ DT. 20/08/2019 HAS OBSERVED THAT CIRCULAR NO.17/2019 DATED 08/08/2019 RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF MONETARY LIMITS IS ALSO APPLICABLE TO ALL PENDING APPEALS. AS PER AFORESAID CIRCULAR READ WI TH INSTRUCTIONS, ALL PENDING APPEALS FILED BY REVENUE ARE LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS A MEASURE FOR REDUCING LITIGATION WHERE THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMIT WHICH IS N OW REVISED AT RS.50 LAKHS. IN THE INSTANT - 2 - ITA NO.474/RJT/2012 THE ITO VS. M/S. POOJA SHIPPING CO., ASST.YEAR 2009-10 CASE, THE TAX EFFECT ON THE DISPUTED ISSUES RAISED BY THE REVENUE IS STATED TO BE NOT EXCEEDING RS.50 LAKHS AND THEREFORE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS REQUIRED TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 3. THE LEARNED DR FOR THE REVENUE FAIRLY ADMITTED T HE APPLICABILITY OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 17 OF 2019. ACCORDINGLY, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. HOWEVER, IT WILL BE OPEN TO THE REVENUE TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL ON SHOWING INAPPLICABILITY OF THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR IN ANY MANNER. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 05/09/2019 SD/- SD/ - ( WASEEM AHMED ) ( MS. MADHUMITA ROY ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 05/09/2019 PRITI YADAV, SR.PS / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. / CONCERNED CIT 4. ( ) / THE CIT(A) - JAMNAGAR. 5. , , ! /DR,ITAT, RAJKOT 6. '# $% / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// / ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , ! / ITAT, RAJKOT 1. DATE OF DICTATION 04.09.2019. 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER 04.09.2019 3. OTHER MEMBER. 4. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.P. S./P.S .. 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE D ICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR.P .S./P.S. 7. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK 8. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK ... 9. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.. 10. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER