आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, रायऩ ु र न्यायऩीठ, रायऩ ु र IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR श्री रविश स ू द, न्याययक सदस्य एवं श्री अरुण खोड़वऩया, ऱेखा सदस्य के समक्ष । BEFORE SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM आयकर अऩीऱ सं./ITA No.48/RPR/2018 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) The DCIT, Circle-3(1), Raipur Vs M/s Shivalik Power & Steel Pvt. Ltd., C-33, 3 rd Floor, Ashoka Millenium, Rajendra Nagar, Raipur PAN No. : AAICS 7879 Q (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Nikhilesh Begani, CA राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri G.N.Singh, Sr. DR स ु निाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 02/08/2022 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 31/10/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, AM : This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 26.12.2017 passed by the CIT(A)-I, Raipur, relating to Assessment Year 2009-2010. 2. At the outset, we find that the tax effect involved in the instant appeal is below Rs.50 lakhs. Therefore, in view of the recent CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 8 th August, 2019, raising the monetary limit for filing of the appeal by the Revenue before the Tribunal to Rs.50 lakhs and the subsequent clarification of the CBDT, vide Notification dated 20 th August, 2019 stating that the said Circular is applicable even to pending appeals, the appeal filed by the Revenue is not maintainable. 3. Thus, the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the Revenue is, admittedly, below Rs.50 lakhs. Therefore, in view of the CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 8 th August, 2019 raising the monetary limits for filing of the appeals by the Revenue before the Tribunal to Rs.50 lakhs and the subsequent clarification dated 20 th August, 2019 to the effect that the said Circular is applicable even to pending appeals, the appeal filed by the Revenue is not maintainable. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. ITA No.48/RPR/2018 2 4. However, if the Revenue at any point of time finds that the tax effect involved in the grounds of the Revenue is more than Rs.50 lakhs or that the same is falling under the exceptions provided in the said Circular, the Revenue may move necessary application for recall of this order. 5. In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in pursuance to Rule 34(4) of ITAT Rules, 1963 on 31/10/2022. Sd/- (RAVISH SOOD) Sd/- (ARUN KHODPIA) न्यानयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER ऱेखा सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER रायऩ ु र/Raipur; ददनाांक Dated 31/10/2022 Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.P.S. आदेश की प्रनतलऱपऩ अग्रेपषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : आदेशान ु सार/ BY ORDER, (Assistant Registrar) आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, रायऩ ु र/ITAT, Raipur 1. अऩीऱाथी / The Appellant- 2. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent- 3. आयकर आय ु क्त(अऩीऱ) / The CIT(A), 4. आयकर आय ु क्त / CIT 5. विभागीय प्रयतयनधध, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, रायऩ ु र/ DR, ITAT, Raipur 6. गार्ड पाईऱ / Guard file. सत्यावऩत प्रयत //True Copy//