Planman Consulting (India) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi V. Addl.CIT, Special Range-7, New Delhi

ITA 4805/DEL/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4120 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 10 month(s) 23 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-05-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 05-07-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: AKANSHA DAWAR

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI A BENCH: NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING ) BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.4805/DEL/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 PLANMAN CONSULTING (INDIA) PVT.LTD., 48, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PHASE- I, NARAINA INDUSTRIAL AREA, NEW DELHI-110028. PAN-AAACP9503C VS ADDL. CIT, SPECIAL RANGE-7, NEW DELHI. APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY MS. AKANSHA DAWAR, CA RESPONDENT BY SH. MAHESH THAKUR, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING 28.05.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 28.05.2021 ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEA R 2014-15 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A)-38, DELHI D ATED 20.02.2018. 2. THE ASSESSEE, VIDE ITS LETTER DATED 07.04.2021, RECEIVE D THROUGH EMAIL, HAS REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FILED BY HER AND STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELA TING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UN DER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. 3. CONSIDERING THE AFORESAID SITUATION, THE CAPTIONED APPEA L IS CONSIGNED TO RECORDS AND TREATED AS DISMISSED. 4. HOWEVER, THE AFORESAID IS SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT THAT IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARREARS FOR THE CAPTIONED ASSESS MENT YEAR IS NOT 2 ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE AFORESTATED ACT, THE APPELLANT (I.E., THE ASSESSEE) SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR REINSTITUTION OF THE APPEAL AND THE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER SUCH APPLICATIO N APPROPRIATELY AS PER LAW. THE RESPONDENT (I.E., THE REVENUE ) HAS NO OBJECTION WITH REGARD TO THE AFORESAID CAVEAT. 5. IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID, THE APPEAL IS CONSIGNED TO REC ORD AND, FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, IS TREATED AS DISMISSED. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTUAL HE ARING IN THE PRESENCE OF BOTH THE PARTIES ON 28 TH MAY, 2021. SD/- SD/- (AMIT SHUKLA) (G.S. PA NNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESID ENT * AMIT KUMAR * COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI