IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES SMC : DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA.NO.4814/DEL./2017 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 SHRI GURBAKSH SINGH, H.NO.173, LAXMI BHAVAN, GANDHI NAGAR, GHAZIABAD. U.P. PAN AMIPS2929N VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), GHAZIABAD, (U.P.). (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) FOR ASSESSEE : - NONE - FOR REVENUE : SHRI KOUSHLENDRA TEWARI, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 31.10.2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 31.10.2017 ORDER THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A), GHAZIABAD, DATED 26 TH APRIL, 2017 FOR THE A.Y. 2008-2009 2. THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN NOTIFIED THE DATE OF HEAR ING THROUGH REGISTERED POST. HOWEVER, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF O F THE ASSESSEE DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE. IT THEREFORE, APPEARS AS SESSEE IS NO MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, AP PEAL OF ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED. 2 ITA.NO.4814/DEL./2017 SHRI GURBAKSH SINGH, GHAZIABAD. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FOLLOWING V ARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF MU LTIPLAN INDIA LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.); HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COUR T DECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND ALSO THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN T HE CASE OF CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477 -478) WHEREIN THEIR LORDSHIPS HELD THAT THE APPEAL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILING OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFFECTIVELY PURSUING THE SAME, T HE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS UN-ADMITTED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. SD/- (BHAVNESH SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER DELHI, DATED 31 ST OCTOBER, 2017 VBP/- COPY TO 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) CONCERNED 4. CIT CONCERNED 5. D.R. ITAT SMC BENCH, DELHI 6. GUARD FILE. 3 ITA.NO.4814/DEL./2017 SHRI GURBAKSH SINGH, GHAZIABAD. // BY ORDER // ASST. REGISTRAR : ITAT DELHI BENCHES : DELHI.