DADUS, HYDERABAD V. CIT (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE

ITA 482/Hyd/2021

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 105 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9957 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-01-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB-B
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Appeal Filed On: 22-11-2021
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ROHIT MAJUMDAR
• Section: 43B; 143(1)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD ‘ B ’ BENCH, HYDERABAD. BEFORE SHRI S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L. P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Through Virtual Hearing) ITA No.482/Hyd/2021 (Assessment Year : 2018-19) M/s. Dadus, Hyderabad. PAN AADFD7340R Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 4(1), Hyderabad. Appellant Respondent Appellant By : None. Respondent By : Shri Rohit Majumdar (D.R.) Date of Hearing : 13.01.2022. Date of Pronouncement : 19.01.2022. O R D E R Per Shri S.S. Godara, J.M. : This assessee’s appeal for Asst. Year 2018-19 arises from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) Delhi’s order dt.31.08.2021 passed in case No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035203494(1) in proceedings under Section 143(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’). Case called twice. None appeared at assessee's behest. Heard learned department representative. We proceed to hear exparte. 2 ITA No.482Hyd/2021 2. We notice at the outset that assessee's instant appeal suffers from 24 days delay in filing. Learned counsel submitted that due to the outbreak of pandemic covid 19 unable to get the documents from the department which caused the impugned delay in filing of the instant appeal. Case law Collector Land Acquisition Vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors, 1987 AIR 1353 (SC) and University of Delhi Vs. Union of India, Civil Appeal No.9488 & 9489/2019 dated 17 th Dec., 2019, hold that such a delay; supported by cogent reasons, deserves to be condoned so as to make way for the cause of substantial justice. We accordingly hold that assessee's impugned delay of twenty four days is neither intentional nor deliberate but due to the circumstances beyond its control. The same stands condoned. Case is now taken up for adjudication on merits therefore. 3. Coming to the sole substantive issue of ESI/PF disallowance of Rs.8,11,702/- made in both the lower proceedings, assessee's and Revenue’s rival stands adopted before us are that the same had been paid before the due date of filing Sec.139(1) return and after the due date prescribed in the corresponding statutes; respectively. We notice in this factual backdrop that the legislature has not only incorporated necessary amendment in Sections 36(1)(va) as well as u/s. 43B vide Finance Act, 2021 to this effect but also the CBDT has issued Memorandum of Explanation that the same applies w.e.f. 01-04- 2021 only. It is further not an issue that the foregoing legislative amendments have proposed employers’ contribution/ 3 ITA No.482Hyd/2021 disallowance u/s.43B as against employee’s contribution u/s.36(va) of the Act; respectively. However, keeping in mind the fact that the same has been clarified to be applicable with prospective effect from 01-04-2021 only, we hold that the impugned disallowance is not sustainable in view of all these latest developments. The impugned ESI/PF disallowance is deleted therefore. 4. These assessee’s appeal is allowed in above terms. Order pronounced in the open court on 19 th Jan.,2022. Sd/- Sd/- (L.P. SAHU) (S.S. GODARA) Accountant Member Judicial Member Hyderabad, Dt.19.01.2022. * Reddy gp Copy to : 1. M/s. Dadus, 3-6-13/1, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. 2. DCIT, Circle 4(1), Hyderabad. 3. Pr. C I T Hyderabad. 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR, ITAT, Hyderabad. 6. Guard File. By Order Sr. Pvt. Secretary, ITAT, Hyderabad.