आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, ‘डी’ यायपीठ, चे नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI ी जी.मंज ु नाथ, लेखा सद य एवं ी अ"नके श बनज%, या"यक सद य के सम& BEFORE SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I. T. A. No. 4 8 5/ Chn y/ 2 0 1 7 ( नधा रणवष / A s se s sm ent Y ea r : 2 01 2- 13 ) M/s.Malles Rajarajeswari 19, Tanjore Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017. V s The Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward-1(3) Chennai. P AN: A AO F M 2 8 2 3 M (अपीलाथ /Appellant) ( यथ /Respondent) अपीलाथ क ओरसे/ Appellant by : Mr. A.Arjunraj, C.A for Mr.S.Sridhar, Advocate यथ क ओरसे/Respondent by : Mr. G.Johnson, Addl.CIT स ु नवाईक तार ख/D a t e o f h e a r i n g : 07.03.2022 घोषणाक तार ख /D a t e o f P r o n o u n c e m e n t : 07.03.2022 आदेश / O R D E R PER G.MANJUNATHA, AM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-2, Chennai, dated 27.01.2017 and pertains to assessment year 2012-13. 2. The learned counsel for the assessee, at the time of hearing, filed a petition dated 07.03.2022 stating that the assessee has instructed him to withdraw the appeal, in view of settlement of dispute arising from cross appeal filed by the Department under Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020, and therefore, prayed that assessee may be permitted to withdraw its appeal and same may be dismissed as withdrawn. 2 ITA No. 485/Chny/2017 3. The learned DR for the Revenue has no objection to withdraw the appeal. 4. In view of the above reasons, we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 7 th March, 2022 Sd/- Sd/- (अ"नके श बनज%) (जी. मंज ु नाथ) (Anikesh Banerjee) (G.Manjunatha) "या यक सद%य /Judicial Member लेखा सद%य / Accountant Member चे"नई/Chennai, (दनांक/Dated 7 th March, 2022 DS आदेश क त*ल+प अ,े+षत/Copy to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. आयकर आय ु -त (अपील)/CIT(A) 4. आयकर आय ु -त/CIT 5. +वभागीय त न1ध/DR 6. गाड फाईल/GF.