KRISHNA RAMESH SHARMA, MUMBAI V. DCIT CENT.CIR.-2(1), MUMBAI

ITA 4853/MUM/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3269 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 2 month(s) 28 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 12-11-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 14-08-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SMITA VERMA
• Assessee Lawyers: RAMESH SHARMA
• Keywords: Competent authority
• Section: 13; 6

Judgement Text

THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA (AM) I.T.A. NO. 4853/MUM/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15 ) MRS. KRISHNA RAMESH SHARMA FLAT NO. 1101, SADGURU KALYAN BUILDING, JUNCTION OF 13 TH & 17 TH ROAD, KHAR MUMBAI-400 052. PAN : AAOPS5770R VS . DCIT, CC-2(1) OLD CGO BUILDING PRATISTHA BHAVAN M.K. ROAD MUMBAI-400 020. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY SHRI RAMESH SHARMA DEPARTMENT BY MS. SMITA VERMA DATE OF HEARING 11 . 11 . 20 20 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 12.11.2020 O R D E R THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) [IN SHORT LEAR NED CIT(A)] DATED 27.6.2018 PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15. 2. THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RELATE TO DISALLOWANCE OF CLAIM OF SHORT TERM CAPITAL LOSS. 3. AT THE OUTSET, IN THIS CASE LEARNED COUNSEL OF T HE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT ASSESSEE HAS APPLIED FOR SOLUTION OF DISPUTE U NDER THE VIVAAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME (IN SHORT VSVS1). IN THIS REGARD, IT HAS BE EN SUBMITTED THAT FORM NOS. 1 AND 2 UNDER VSVS1 HAS ALREADY BEEN FILED AND THE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS ALSO ATTACHED. 4. I NOTE THAT IN A SIMILAR SITUATION, HON'BLE MADR AS HIGH COURT HAS IN AN APPEAL IN THE CASE OF M/S. NANNUSAMY MOHAN (HUF) VS . ACIT VIDE ORDER DATED 16.10.2020 HELD AS UNDER :- MRS. KRISHNA RAMESH SHARMA 2 3. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT/ASSESSEE, ON INSTRUCTIONS, SUBMITTED THAT THE APPELLANT/ASSESSEE INTENDS TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME (VVS SCHEME FOR BREVITY) AND IN THI S REGARD, THE ASSESSEE IS TAKING STEPS TO FILE THE APPLICATION/DECLARATION IN FOR M NO. I. 4. IT MAY NOT BE NECESSARY FOR THIS COURT TO DECIDE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW FRAMED FOR CONSIDERATION ON ACCOUNT OF CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENACTED THE DIR ECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 (ACT 3 OF 2020) TO PROVIDE FOR RESO LUTION OF DISPUTED TAX AND FOR MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH OR INCIDENTAL THERETO. T HE ACT OF THE PARLIAMENT RECEIVED THE ASSENT OF THE PRESIDENT ON 17 TH MARCH 2020 AND PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA ON 17 TH MARCH 2020. 5. IN TERMS OF THE SAID ACT, THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN G IVEN AN OPTION TO PUT AN END TO THE TAX DISPUTES, WHICH MAY BE PENDING AT DIFF ERENT LEVELS EITHER BEFORE THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY OR BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL O R BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OR BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. UNDER S ECTION 2(J) DISPUTED TAX HAS BEEN DEFINED. IN TERMS OF SECTION 3, WHERE A DECLARANT MEANS A PERSON, WHO FILES A DECLARATION UNDER SECTION 4 ON OR BEFORE THE LAST DATE FILES A DECLARATION TO THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANC E WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4 IN RESPECT OF TAX ARREARS, THEN, NOTWITHSTAND ING ANYTHING CONTAINED IN THE INCOME TAX ACT OR ANY OTHER LAW FOR THE TIME BE ING IN FORCE, THE AMOUNT PAYABLE BY THE DECLARANT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN TERM S OF SECTION 3(A-C) THEREUNDER. 6. THE FIRST PROVISO TO SECTION 3 STATES THAT IN CASE, W HERE AN APPEAL OR WRIT PETITION OR SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION IS FILED BY T HE INCOME TAX AUTHORITY ON ANY ISSUE BEFORE THE APPELLATE FORUM, THE AMOUNT PAYAB LE SHALL BE ONE-HALF OF THE AMOUNT IN THE TABLE STIPULATED IN SECTION 3 CALCUL ATED ON SUCH ISSUE, IN SUCH A MANNER AS MAY BE PRESCRIBED. THE SECOND PROV ISO DEALS WITH THE CASES, WHERE THE MATTER IS BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER ( APPEALS) OR BEFORE THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL. THE THIRD PROVISO DEALS W ITH CASES, WHERE THE ISSUE IS PENDING BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. THE FILING OF THE DECLARATION IS AS PER SECTION 4 OF THE ACT AND THE PARTI CULARS TO BE FURNISHED ARE ALSO MENTIONED IN THE SUB SECTIONS OF SECTION 4, SE CTION 5 OF THE ACT DEALS WITH THE TIME AND MANNER OF THE PAYMENT AND SECTION 6 DEALS WITH IMMUNITY FROM INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF OFFENCE AND IMPOSITION OF PENALTY IN CERTAIN CASES. SECTION 9 OF THE ACT DEALS WITH CASES, WHERE THE ACT 3 OF 2020 WILL NOT BE APPLICABLE. 7. AS OBSERVED, THE ASSESSEE IS GIVEN LIBERTY TO RE STORE THIS APPEAL IN THE EVENT THE ULTIMATE DECISION TO BE TAKEN ON THE DECLARATI ON TO BE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE SAID ACT IS NOT IN FAV OUR OF THE ASSESSEE. IF SUCH A PRAYER IS MADE, THE REGISTRY SHALL ENTERTAIN THE PRAYER WITHOUT INSISTING UPON ANY APPLICATION TO BE FILED FOR CONDO NATION OF DELAY IN RESTORATION OF THE APPEAL AND ON SUCH REQUEST MADE BY TH E ASSESSEE BY FILING A MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FOR RESTORATION, THE REGISTRY S HALL PLACE SUCH PETITION BEFORE THE DIVISION BENCH FOR ORDERS. 8. IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE, WE DIRECT THE APPELLANT/A SSESSEE TO FILE THE FORM NO.I ON OR BEFORE 20.11.2020 AND THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY SHALL PROCESS MRS. KRISHNA RAMESH SHARMA 3 THE APPLICATION/DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT A ND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE PREFERABLY WITHIN A PERIOD OF SIX (6) WEEKS FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THE DECLARATION IS FILED IN THE PROPER FORM. ACCORDINGLY, RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE ABOVE AND N OTING THE FACT THAT IN THE PRESENT CASE, ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY FILED THE FORM N O. 1, I TREAT THIS APPEAL BEING DISPOSED OFF AS WITHDRAWN. 5. THE ASSESSEE IS GIVEN LIBERTY FOR RESTORATION OF APPEAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT ORDER AS ABOV E. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DI SPOSED OF BY TREATING THE SAME AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED UNDER RULE 34(4) OF THE ITAT RUL ES BY PLACING THE RESULT ON NOTICE BOARD ON 12.11.2020. SD/- (SHAMIM YAHYA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI; DATED : 12/11/2020 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// ( ASSISTANT REGISTRAR) PS ITAT, MUMBAI