Rajena Agro Products Pvt. Ltd., Patan V. The Dy.CIT, Patan Circle, Patan

ITA 49/AHD/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 126 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6362 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 11 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-01-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 06-01-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: V K SINGH
• Keywords: Charitable institution

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER !# I.T.A. NO.49/AHD/2015 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11) RAJENNA AGRO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. SEDRANA, TALUKA SIDHPUR DISTRICT PATAN - 384151 # VS. THE DCIT, PATAN CIRCLE, PATAN $ # % & # PAN/GIR NO. : AAACR 9961 Q ( !$' / APPELLANT ) .. ( ($' # RESPONDENT ) !$') # APPELLANT BY : --NONE-- ($'*) / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI V. K. SINGH, SR. D.R. + ,*-. / DATE OF HEARING 02/01/2018 /012*-. / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 02/01/2018 3# O R D E R PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS IS AN APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORD ER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)- GANDHINAGAR, AHMEDABAD, VIDE APPEAL NO.CIT(A)/GNR/240/2013-14 DATED 08.10.2014 F OR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR (AY) 2010-11. 2. THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE B Y REGISTERED POST AS PER THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN COLUMN NO.10 OF FORM NO . 36. HOWEVER, AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY ITA NO.877/AHD/ 2015 BASIC CHARITABLE TRUST VS. CIT(EXEMPTION) ASST.YEAR 2014-15 - 2 - APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN FILED. FROM T HIS, IT IS REASONABLE TO INFER THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS TO PURSUE IT S CASE. HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B.N. BHATTACHARGEE AND ANOTHER, 118 ITR 461(SC) OBSERVED THAT PREFERRING AN APPEAL MEANS EF FECTIVELY PURSUING IT. HONBLE M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LA TE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480(M.P.) DISMISSED THE REFERENCE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NOT TAKING NECESSARY STEPS. SIMILAR V IEW IS TAKEN BY I.T.A.T., DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDI A LTD., 38 ITD 320. CONSIDERING THE ABOVE, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS APPEAL. WE, THEREFORE, DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NON-PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS D ISMISSED. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 02 / 01 /201 8 SD/- SD/- ( ) 4 5 ( N.K. BILLAIYA ) ( MAHAVIR PRASAD ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 02/01/2018 PRITI YADAV, SR.PS ITA NO.877/AHD/ 2015 BASIC CHARITABLE TRUST VS. CIT(EXEMPTION) ASST.YEAR 2014-15 - 3 - !'#$ %$' # COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. !$' / THE APPELLANT 2. ($' / THE RESPONDENT. 3. 67- + 8- / CONCERNED CIT 4. + 8- 4!5 / THE CIT(A)-GANDHINAGAR, AHMEDABAD. 5. 9:;-67 !.!672 ! / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. ;<=, # GUARD FILE. & ' / BY ORDER, (9-- //TRUE COPY// (/' )* ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD