SANGEETA M. CHOPRA, MUMBAI V. ITO 24(3)(3), MUMBAI

ITA 4906/MUM/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 55711 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 4 month(s) 16 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 31-10-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: E
• Next Hearing Date: 24-10-2011
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 14-06-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

1 SMT SANGEETA M CHOPRA IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI E BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B RAMAKOTAIAH, AM & SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO , JM ITA NO. 4906/MUM/2010 (ASST YEAR 2006-07) SMT SANGEETA M CHOPRA 404 SHASHI APARTMENT GOREGAON (E) MUMBAI 63 VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 24(3)(3), MUMBAI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN NO. AAAPC 6744P ASSESSEE BY NONE REVENUE BY SH V V SHASTRI DT.OF HEARING 24 TH OCT 2011 DT OF PRONOUNCEMENT 31 ST , OCT 2011 PER VIJAY PAL RAO, JM THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER DATED 9 TH MAR 2010 OF THE CIT(A) FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 200 6-07. 2 AT THE TIME OF HEARING FIXED IN THIS CASE TODAY I.E. 24 TH OCT 2011, NOBODY HAS PUT IN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPLICATION SEEKING ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN MOVED DESPITE THE FACT THAT NO TICE FOR THE HEARING ON 24.8.2011 SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY RPAD TO THE ADDRE SS GIVEN IN THE APPEAL MEMO HAS DULY BEEN SERVED UPON THE ASSESSEE, PROOF OF WHICH IS PLACED ON RECORD. THEREAFTER THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED TO 24. 10.2011. THIS TYPE OF CONDUCT ON THE PART OF THE ASSESSEE SHOWS THAT HE I S NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL FILED BY HIM. ACCORDINGLY, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL AS NOT ADMITTED BY FOLLOWING THE DECISIONS OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS CWT (223 ITR 480(MP) AND BY THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS M ULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT LTD (38 ITD 320 (DEL). 2 SMT SANGEETA M CHOPRA 3 HOWEVER, IF THE ASSESSEE THROUGH PROPER APPLICATI ON CAN SATISFY THE TRIBUNAL FOR SUCH NON APPEARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEA RING, THE TRIBUNAL MAY AT ITS DISCRETION RECALL THIS ORDER. 4 IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE I S DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THE 31 ST ,DAY OF OCT 2011 SD/- SD/- (B RAMAKOATIAH ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( VIJAY PAL RAO ) JUDICIAL MEMBER PLACE: MUMBAI : DATED: 31 ST ,OCT 2011 RAJ* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1 APPELLANT 2 RESPONDENT 3 CIT 4 CIT(A) 5 DR /TRUE COPY/ BY ORDER DY /AR, ITAT, MUMBAI