, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, AHMEDABAD .. , ( .) , ! BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGARWAL,VICE PRESIDEN T (AZ) AND SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO.491/AHD/2012 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09 ) MAHESH ENTERPRISE PLOT NO.282, SECTOR-16 4 STAND GANDHINAGAR 382 016 / VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3 GANDHINAGAR % & ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AAPPM 7575 D ( %( / APPELLANT ) .. ( )*%( / RESPONDENT ) %(+ / APPELLANT BY : -NONE- )*%(,+ / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI DINESH SINGH, SR.DR - ., /& / DATE OF HEARING 02/06/2015 0123 , /& / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 05/06/2015 / O R D E R PER SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST T HE ORDER OF THE LD.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-GANDHINAGAR (CIT(A) IN SHORT) DATED 09/12/2011 PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT Y EAR (AY) 2008-09. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT- ASSESSEE. ON PREVIOUS OCCASION, I.E. ON 19/04/2012 ALSO ASSESSEE DID NOT ITA NO.491/AHD/ 2012 MAHESH ENTERPRISE VS. ITO ASST.YEAR 2008-09 - 2 - APPEAR. LAST N OTICE HAS BEEN ISSUED ON 01/05/2015 FIXING THE DATE OF HEARING ON 02/06/2015 AND THE SAME WAS SERVED UPON THE ASSESSEE (AD ON RECORD). UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE HAVE N O OPTION BUT TO DISMISS THE APPEAL SINCE THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING WITH ITS APPEAL. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIG H COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKA VS. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480 (M.P.) AND OF HON'BLE DELHI TRIBUNAL DECISION IN THE C ASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (PVT.) LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DE LHI) , WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . 3. THE ASSESSEE MAY, IF SO ADVISED, FILE AN APPLICA TION BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL FOR RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL AND HEARING ON MERITS BY SHOWING REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NOT APPEARING BEFORE THE TRIBU NAL ON THE DATE OF HEARING. THE BENCH, IF SO SATISFIED, MAY RECALL IT S ORDER AND RESTORE THE APPEAL TO ITS ORIGINAL NUMBER FOR HEARING ON MERITS . 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS D ISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON FRIDAY, THE 5 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- SD/- ( .. ) ( ) ( .) ( G.D. AGARWAL ) ( KUL BHARAT ) VICE PRESIDENT (AZ) JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 5/ 06 /2015 6/..- , .-../ T.C. NAIR, SR. PS ITA NO.491/AHD/ 2012 MAHESH ENTERPRISE VS. ITO ASST.YEAR 2008-09 - 3 - !'#$%&%# / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. %( / THE APPELLANT 2. )*%( / THE RESPONDENT. 3. 789 : / CONCERNED CIT 4. : ( ) / THE CIT(A)-GANDHINAGAR 5. ; <)-89 , /893 , 7 / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. < => . / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER, * ;) //TRUE COPY// / ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD 1. DATE OF DICTATION .. 2.6.15 (COPIED MATTER) 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER .. 3. OTHER MEMBER... 4. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.P. S./P.S.. 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE D ICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR. P.S./P.S.5.6.2015 7. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK 5.6.2015 8. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK ... 9. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.. 10. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER