, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH : CHENNAI , . ! '# BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI G.PAVAN KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO. 492/MDS./2017 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09 MR.S.BRITTO , 35/5, CRM VISION CITY, PANNERSELVAM STREET, SOUTH OTHAKKAL MANDAPAM, COIMBATORE 641 032. VS. THE ITO, WARD 1(2), POLLACHI. [PAN AMPPB 8785 N ] ( $% / APPELLANT) ( &'$% /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : MR.GURUBASHYAM, JCIT,D.R / DATE OF HEARING : 25.04 .2017 !' / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 25 .04 .2017 ( / O R D E R PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)-2, COIMBATORE DATED 30.12.2016 PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09. ITA NO.492/MDS./2017 :- 2 -: 2. WHEN THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING ON 25 .04.2017, NOBODY APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE TO PURSUE THE APPEAL, DESPITE NOTICE DATED 11.04.2017 BEING SENT TO THE A SSESSEE BY REGISTERED POST. FROM THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD OF T HE POST OFFICE PLACED ON RECORD, IT IS SEEN THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS RECEIVED THE NOTICE OF HEARING ON 15.04.2017. THEREFORE, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN CONDUCTING THE CASE, HENCE FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF C.I.T. VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD.(38 ITD 320) (DEL.), WE HEREB Y DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AFTER CONCLUSI ON OF HEARING ON 25 TH OF APRIL, 2017. SD/ - SD/ - ( . ) ( G.PAVAN KUMAR ) ! / JUDICIAL MEMBER ( ) (CHANDRA POOJARI) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER #$ / CHENNAI %& / DATED: 25 TH APRIL, 2017. K S SUNDARAM &'(()*( +* / COPY TO: ( 1 . / APPELLANT 3. ( ,(- . / CIT(A) 5. */0 (1 / DR 2. / RESPONDENT 4. ( , / CIT 6. 02(3 / GF