JX Nippon Two Lubricants India Pvt. Ltd, Gurgaon V. DCIT circle-2(1), Gurgaon

ITA 4985/DEL/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2901 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 9 month(s) 2 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-03-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Appeal Filed On: 31-05-2019
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: VED PRAKASH MISHRA
• Keywords: Business income; Depreciation; Application of stay; Cost of acquisition; Fair market value; Valuation report; Scheme of amalgamation; Capital Gains
• Section: 32; 27; 271(1)(c); 234B; 201; 13; 22; 20

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH C, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER DR. B. R. R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 :ASSTT. YEAR : 2015-16 & SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 :ASSTT. YEAR : 2015-16 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD., UNIT NO. 1003, 10 TH FLOOR, VATIKA CITY POINT, MG ROAD, GURGAON, HARYANA - 122001 VS DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), GURGAON-122001 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN NO. AADCJ3601L ASSESSEE BY :SH. NAGESWARRAO, ADV. REVENUE BY:SH. VEDPRAKASH MISHRA, SR.DR DATE OF HEAR ING: 13 . 01 .20 2 1 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 02 . 03 .20 2 1 ORDER PER DR. B. R. R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THE PRESENT APPEAL AND STAY APPLICATION HAS BEEN F ILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-1, GURGAON DATED 05.03.2019. 2. FOLLOWING GROUNDS HAVE BEEN RAISED BY THE ASSESS EE: 1. ON THE FACTS AND IN CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A ND IN LAW, THE ORDER PASSED BY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - 1, GURGAON (LD. CIT(A)) AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2(1), GURGAON (LD. AO) ARE BAD IN LAW AND LIABLE TO BE QUASHED. 2. THAT ON FACTS AND IN CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A ND IN LAW, LD. CIT(A) AND LD. AO HAS ERRED IN ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 2 DISALLOWING DEPRECIATION ON GOODWILL AMOUNTING TO RS. 13,46,78,733/- CLAIMED UNDER SECTION 32 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (THE ACT) WITHOUT APPRECIATING ALL RELEVANT FACTS AVAILABLE ON RECORD AND RELYING UPON DECISIONS WHICH ARE DISTINGUISHABL E ON FACTS. 3.THAT ON FACTS AND IN CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AN D IN LAW, LD. CIT(A) AND LD. AO HAS ERRED IN DISREGARDING MATERIAL PLACED ON RECORD, SUBMISSIONS INCLUDING VARIOUS AGREEMENTS AND PROCEEDED TO DENY APPELLANTS LEGITIMATE CLAIMS ON MERE SUSPICIONS, CONJECTURES AND SURMISES. 4. THAT LD. CIT(A) ERRED IN DISMISSING APPEAL WITHOUT CONSIDERING VARIOUS INTANGIBLE ASSETS ACQUIRED BY APPELLANT UNDER BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT (BTA) AND THEIR APPARENT FINANCIAL BENEFITS TO APPELLANT IN EARLY YEARS OF ITS OPERATI ONS. 5. THAT LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN NOT APPRECIATING THAT GAIN ARISING TO TRANSFEROR COMPANY UNDER BTA AMOUNTING TO RS. 107.82 CRORES HAS ALREADY BEEN OFFERED TO TAX AND AMOUNT OF RS. 24.43 CRORES HAS ALREADY BEEN DISCHARGED AS TAX LIABILITY FOR AY 201 5- 16 BY TRANSFEROR COMPANY, WHICH FACT HAS NOT ALSO BEEN DISPUTED BY EITHER OF LOWER AUTHORITIES. 6. THAT ON FACTS AND IN CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN LAW, LD. CIT(A) AND LD. AO HAS ERRED IN NOT FOLLOWING DECISIONS OF HONBLE COURTS AND GRANTING RELIEF AS PRAYED. 7. THE LD. AO HAS ERRED ON FACTS AND IN LAW IN PROPOSING TO LEVY INTEREST UNDER SECTION 234A, 234B AND234C OF THE ACT. 8. THE LD. AO HAS ERRED, IN FACTS AND IN LAW, BY INITIATING PENALTY PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 271(1)(C) OF THE ACT. ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 3 ANTECEDENTS OF THE ASSESSEE: 3. THE ASSESSEE COMPANY, JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS I NDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (JX NIPPON) WAS INCORPORATED IN IND IA AS A 50:50 JOINT VENTURE BETWEEN TIDE WATER OIL COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED (TWO) AND JX NIPPON OIL AND ENERGY CORPORAT ION, JAPAN (JXNOE) IN ORDER TO TRANSFER THE ENEOS BUSINESS SE GMENT (EBS) WHICH INCLUDES BUSINESS UNDERTAKING RELATING TO FACTORY FILL (FF) OILS BUSINESS AND SERVICE FILL (SF) OILS) FROM TWO TO JX NIPPON. THE COMPANY IS ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF M ARKETING, DISTRIBUTING, SELLING, MANUFACTURING (INCLUDING THR OUGH TOLL MANUFACTURING OF LUBRICATING OIL. 4. THE ASSESSEE DURING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR HAD CAPI TALIZED THE GOODWILL TOTALING TO RS.107,74,29,864/- OUT OF WHICH THE ASSESSEE HAD CLAIMED DEPRECIATION OF RS.13,46,78,73 3/- UNDER SECTION 32(1)(II)(B) OF THE ACT. IT IS ALSO BEING O BSERVED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAD CAPITALIZED THE GOODWILL ON ACCOUNT OF EXCESS CONSIDERATION PAID TO THE M/S TIDE WATER OIL COMPAN Y (INDIA) LIMITED' (TWO) ON ACCOUNT OF PURCHASE OF ENEOS BUS INESS SEGMENT (EBS) OF THE LATER COMPANY. THE CORE ISSUE: 5. DURING THE YEAR, THE ASSESSEE HAS PURCHASEDENEO S BUSINESS SEGMENT OF M/S TIDE WATER OIL COMPANY (IN DIA) LIMITED UNDER BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT DATED 24 .09.2014 FOR A TOTAL CONSIDERATION OF RS.106 CRORE AND GENER ATED THE GOODWILL AS UNDER: ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 4 PARTICULARS AMOUNT (RS.) PURCHASE CONSIDERATION FOR ENEOS BUSINESS SEGMENT AS PER BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT DATED 24/09/2014 108,00,00,000/ - LESS: NET ASSETS TAKEN OVER AS PER BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT DATED 24/09/2014 25,74,136/ - EXCESS CONSIDERATION RECOGNIZED AS GOODWILL IN THE BOOKS 107,74,29,864/ - 6. THE ASSESSING OFFICER OBSERVED THAT ONLY ONE ASS ET GOT TRANSFERRED BY THE ABOVE MENTIONED PARTIES TO THE A SSESSEE I.E. STORAGE TANK INSTALLED AT HONDA CAR PREMISES, LAND FIXED 30 KL LUBRICANTS TANK (1 TANK) BUILT IN 2012 AND UTILIZED IN THE PREMISES OF HONDA CARS INDIA LIMITED LOCATED PLOT N O A-1, SECTOR-40/41, SURAJPUR, KASNA, ROAD, GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA, DISTT. GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR, U.P.-20 1301. 7. THEREFORE, THE AO HELD THAT APART FROM THE ABOVE , THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT PURCHASED/GOT ANYTHING EXCEPT THE STORAGE TANK WHICH THE ASSESSEE IS LEGALLY BOUNDED TO PAY T HE CONSIDERATION. 8. BEFORE THE AO, THE ASSESSEE FILED, THE BUSINESS PURCHASE AGREEMENT DATED 24.09.2014 AS EXECUTED BETWEEN M/S TIDE WATER OIL COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED, ASSESSEE COMPANY AND M/S JX NIPPON OIL & ENERGY CORPORATION (JX NOE). AFTER PERUSAL OF THE BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT, THE AO NOTED THE F OLLOWING POINTS: A. UNDER THE BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT THE ASSESSEE, M/S TIDE WATER OIL COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED AND M/S JX N IPPON OIL & ENERGY CORPORATION (JAPAN) ARE THE PARTIES TO THE AGREEMENT. ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 5 B. M/S TIDE WATER OIL COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED IS BEING A TRANSFEROR AND ASSESSEE COMPANY IS THE TRANSFEREE COMPANY TO THE CONTRACT PURSUANT TO WHICH THE TRANS FEROR INTEND TO SELL THE BUSINESS UNDERTAKING ON A SLUMP SALE UNDER SECTION 2(42C) OF THE ACT TO REORGANIZE THE S F OILS BUSINESS AT THE TOTAL CONSIDERATION FOR THE AMOUNT OF RS. 108 CRORE. C. THE AGREEMENT FURTHER STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE SHAL L ENTER INTO THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT WITH JX NOE PURSUANT TO WHICH THE JX NOE SHALL GRANT TO THE TRA NSFEREE A ROYALTY BEARING THE RIGHT AND LICENSE TO USE JX N OE TECHNOLOGY, KNOWHOW AND TRADEMARKS TO MANUFACTURING)INCLUDING THOUGH TOLL MANUFACTURING B Y THE TRANSFEROR). MARKET, DISTRIBUTION AND/OR SELL THE L ICENSED PRODUCTS WITH A RIGHT TO SUB LICENSE THE USE OF TEC HNICAL INFORMATION, KNOWHOW AND TRADEMARKS TO THE TRANSFER OR AND THE OTHER AUTHORIZED SUB LICENSES APPROVED BY J X NOLI (RELIANCE IS PLACED ON PARA 2.4 (B) OF THE BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT). D. VIDE PARA 2.4(H) OF THE. BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMEN T, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE TRANSFEROR AND TRANSFEREE ENTER I NTO THE FRANCHISEE AGREEMENT FOR REORGANIZATION AND CONDUCT OF THE SF OILS BUSINESS PURSUANT TO WHICH THE TRANSFEREE S HALL APPOINT THE TRANSFEROR AS ITS INDUSTRIAL FRANCHISEE OF THE SF OILS BUSINESS AND. GRANT TO THE TRANSFEROR A FRANCH ISEE FEE BEARING RIGHT AND SUB LICENSE TO USE JX NOE TECHNOL OGY AND KNOWHOW (AND TRADEMARK FOR THE SF OILS BRANDED WITH JX NOE TRADEMARKS) TO 'MANUFACTURE, SELL AND DISTRI BUTE IN ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 6 THE TERRITORY THE SF OILS STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WI TH THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN THE SUCH AGREEMENT. E. UNDER THE FRANCHISEE AGREEMENT, THE TRANSFEREE WOUL D AGREE TO UNDERTAKE THE MARKETING ACTIVITIES RELATIN G TO SF OILS AND PROVIDE THE TRANSFER WITH CERTAIN STRATEGI C SUPPORT, ARID SERVICES IN RELATION TO THE UNDERTAKING OF THE SF OILS BUSINESS. 9. THE ASSESSING OFFICER EXAMINED THESE FACTS AND N OTED THAT THE APPELLANT AND THE TRANSFEREE COMPANY ARE RELATE D PARTIES AND THEREFORE TO VERIFY THE GENUINENESS OF THE BUSI NESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT ASKED THE APPELLANT TO JUSTIFY THE CLAIM OF DEPRECIATION ON GOODWILL. 10. THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE VALUATION OF E NEOS BUSINESS SEGMENT AT RS.108 CRORES WAS BASED ON DET AILED BUSINESS VALUATION EARNED OUT BY REPUTED FIRM OF CH ARTERED ACCOUNTANT AND THE CONSIDERATION PAID OVER AND ABOV E THE NET ASSET REQUIRED AMOUNTING TO RS.107,74,29,864/- HAD BEEN RIGHTLY RECOGNIZED AS GOODWILL ON WHICH DEPRECIATIO N HAD BEEN CLAIMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DECISION OF THE HON BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. SMIRFS SECURITIES LTD. (348 ITR 302) (2012). 11. THE ASSESSING OFFICER POINTED OUT THAT THE ASSE SSEE HAD RELIED UPON THE VALUATION REPORT WHICH WAS BASED ON THE BUSINESS OR COMMERCIAL RIGHTS OF SIMILAR NATURE BUT THE APPELLANT HAD FAILED TO PRODUCE ANY COGENT MATERIAL ON THE BASIS OF WHICH IT COULD BE CONCLUDED THAT THE CONSIDERATI ON HAD BEEN PAID FOR ANY COMMERCIAL OR BUSINESS RIGHTS. ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 7 12. THE ASSESSING OFFICER REFERRED TO THE FRANCHISE E AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE APPELLANT AND TWO AND POINTED OUT THE FOLLOWING FACTS IN THE AGREEMENT: I. THE ASSESSEE SHALL HAVE THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO SUPP LY THE LUBRICANT OILS FOR AUTOMOBILE, AGRICULTURAL MACHINE AND CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY WITHIN INDIA TO JAPANESE AND KOREAN OEMS LISTED IN ANNEXURE OF THE JV AGREEMENT. II. THE ASSESSEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEFINING THE STRATE GY WITH RESPECT TO THE SF OILS BUSINESS WITHIN THIS ARRANGE MENT. III. THE TRANSFEROR DESIRED TO USE THE TECHNOLOGY, TRADE MARKS AND TRADE NAMES AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND AVAIL ITSELF OF THE STRATEGIC SERVICES AND MARKETING AND SALES S UPPORT FUNCTION IN CONDUCTING THE SF OILS BUSINESS IN THE TERRITORY AND ASSESSEE IS WILLING TO GRANT THE FRANCHISEE TO THE TRANSFEROR TO CONDUCT THE SF OILS BUSINESS USING TH E AFORESAID INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. IV. THE FRANCHISEE AGREEMENT CONTAIN THE NON-EXCLUSIVE SUBLICENSE GRANTS CLAUSE UNDER WHICH THE ASSESSEE COMPANY GRANTS TRANSFEROR COMPANY A NON-EXCLUSIVE A ND NON-TRANSFERABLE LICENSE TO SERVICE THE CUSTOMERS I N RELATION TO THE SF OILS BUSINESS IN THE TERRITORY. 13. THE ASSESSING OFFICER REFERRED TO THE BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT AND THE FRANCHISEE AGREEMENT AND DREW THE FOLLOWING CONCLUSIONS: A. THE ASSESSEE COMPANY, BEING JOINT VENTURE, WAS INCORPORATED AS ON 08/08/2014. THE INCORPORATION OF THE ASSESSEE WAS MADE WITH THE PRIOR ARRANGEMENT WHICH WAS BEING EXECUTED BETWEEN M/S TWO WATER OIL COMPANY ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 8 (INDIA) LIMITED (HEREIN AFTER TWO) AND JX NIPPON OI L ENERGY CORPORATION JAPAN (HEREIN AFTER JXNOE). B. THE ASSESSEE WAS INCORPORATED WITH THE INTENT THAT THERE IS 50:50 PERCENT INTEREST IN THE JOINT VENTURE AS EXEC UTED BETWEEN TWO AND JX NOE. THE ASSESSEE COMPANY AT THE TIME OF INCORPORATION SUBSCRIBED WITH THE RS.10000/ - SHARE CAPITAL WHICH IS 5000 SHARE TO EACH PARTY AT THE FA CE VALUE OF RS.10/- EACH. C. FURTHER, THE FACTS FROM THE PERUSAL OF THE FINANCIA L STATEMENT REVEALED THAT THE BOTH TWO AND JX NOE CONTRIBUTE THE FOLLOWING AMOUNT WHICH IS AS FOLLOWS : S . NO NAME NO OF SHARES FACEV ALUE SECURITY PREMIUM PRICE PER SHARE TOTAL AMOUNT 1 M/S TWO WATER OIL COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED 550000 10 1070 1080 594000000 2 JX NIPPON OIL & ENERGY CORPORATION 550000 10 1070 1080 594000000 1188000000 D. FROM THE PERUSAL OF THE CASH FLOW STATEMENT OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY, IT IS FURTHER OBSERVED THAT THE A BOVE CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION HAS BEEN USED TO PAY THE SALE CONSIDERATION AMOUNTING TO RS.108 CRORE OF THE BUSI NESS SEGMENT WHICH IS PURCHASED FROM THE M/S TWO WATER O IL COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED. HENCE, APPROXIMATE THE 92% OF THE CAPITAL AS INTRODUCED IN THE COMPANY WAS USED T O PAY ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 9 THE SALES CONSIDERATION FOR THE BUSINESS SEGMENT WH ICH HAVING THE MEAGER NET ASSETS VALUE TO THE TUNE OF RS.25,74,136/-. E. FURTHER, AS PER THE BUSINESS PURCHASE AGREEMENT, TW O HAD SOLD THE BUSINESS SEGMENT COMPRISING OF FF OIL AND SF LUBRICANT OIL TO THE ASSESSEE COMPANY. BUT AFTER PU RCHASE OF BUSINESS THE ASSESSEE UNDER THE FRANCHISEE AGREE MENT AGAIN INCARCERATED THE MANUFACTURING SEGMENT TO THE TWO. IT ONLY REMAINS WITH THE MARKETING OR DISTRIBUTION DEPARTMENT WITH IT. F. HERE, IT IS PERTINENT TO NOTE THE ROLE OF JX NOE WH ICH IS ALWAYS BEING THE PARTY TO THE BUSINESS PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND ENTAILS THAT IT WOULD PROVIDE ALL THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SUPPORT BE IN THE NATURE OF K NOWHOW, TRADEMARKS, PATENTS, TECHNOLOGY TO MANUFACTURING TH E SF OR FF LUBRICANT OILS. 14. THE ASSESSING OFFICER POINTED OUT THAT UNDER TH E BUSINESS AGREEMENT, THE TWO HAD TRANSFERRED BUSINESS SEGME NT NAMELY ENEOS BUSINESS SEGMENT (EBS) TO THE ASSESSEE AND O BSERVED THAT THE ENEOS BRAND WAS IN FACT OWNED BY JX NOE, J APAN SINCE ITS INCORPORATION. THE ASSESSING OFFICER ALSO REFER RED TO THE VALUATION REPORT PROVIDED BY THE ASSESSEE AND POINT ED OUT THAT THE VALUATION REPORT DID NOT CONTAIN ANY ANALOGY RE GARDING THE COMMERCIAL RIGHTS WHICH TWO WHO WAS HAVING. THE ASSESSING OFFICER POINTED OUT THAT THE ASSESSEE DID NOT PURCH ASE OR ACQUIRE ANY RIGHTS UNDER THE AGREEMENT AND IN FACT THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ASSESSEE AND TWO WOULD CEASE TO EXIST ONCE JX NOE CANCELS THE LICENSE OF INTELLECTUAL PRO PERTY IN TERMS OF ENEOS AS IN THAT CASE TWO WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 10 MANUFACTURE AND MARKET THE PRODUCT. THE ASSESSING OFFICER OBSERVED THAT THE ASSESSEE DID NOT BRING ANY COGENT MATERIAL APART FROM THE BUSINESS PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO SHOW THAT ANY INTANGIBLE BENEFIT ON ACCOUNT OF THIS AGREEMENT . THE ASSESSING OFFICER REFERRED TO THE VALUATION REPORT FILED BY T HE ASSESSEE AND POINTED OUT THAT THERE WAS NO REFERENCE WITH RE GARD TO THE DETERMINATION INTANGIBLE ASSET IN THE VALUATION REP ORT. THERE WAS NO MATERIAL TO SUPPORT ANY VALUATION OF INTANGI BLES ACQUIRED BY THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSING OFFICER REFERRED TO THE DECISION OF THE CO-ORDINATE BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CAS E OF CHOWGULE & CO. PVT. LTD. VS ASSTT. CIT, MARGAO (201 1) 10 TAXMAN.COM 224 (PANAJI) AND OBSERVED THAT THE TRIBU NAL HAD HELD THAT GOODWILL WAS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR DEPRECIATIO N IN THAT CASE. 15. AFTER CONSIDERING ALL THE FACTS OF THE CASE, TH E ASSESSING OFFICER HELD AS UNDER: THE ASSESSEE GROSSLY FAILED TO PROVIDE THE ANY COGENT AND RELIABLE MATERIAL ON THE BASIS OF WHICH, THE CLAIM OF DEPRECIATION WAS ALLOWED TO IT. THE AGREEMENT WHEN READ INTO CONTEXTUAL MANNER THEN IT LEADS TO ONLY ONE IRRETRIEVABLE CONCLUSION THAT THE WHOLE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ASSESSEE, JX NOE AND TWO TO PROVIDE THE FRANCHISEE TO THE ASSESSEE AND CREATE THE HUGE AMOUNT OF GOODWILL IN THE BOOKS OF THE ASSESSEE ON WHICH THE DEPRECIATION COULD BE CLAIM WHEREBY INCOME OF THE CONCERNED ASSESSMENT YEAR OR THEREAFTER WOULD GET REDUCE BY VIRTUE OF SUCH GOODWILL AS I HAVE ALREADY BEEN DISCUSSED, AS SUPRA, THAT THE ALL THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WOULD BE VESTED WITH THE JX NOE AND TWO IS IN A COUNTERPART IN INDIA HAS BEEN USED TO SALE THE ENEO BRANDED PRODUCT. TWO DID NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS OR IF ANY WHICH ARE ONLY BASED ON THE IPR OF THE JX NOE THEREFORE COULD NOT SAID TO BE CEDED THE RIGHTS WHICH IT DID NOT HOLD. THEREFORE, IT IS ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 11 CONCLUDED THAT SUM OF RS.107,74,29,864/- WAS NOT EXPENDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASE OR ANY COMMERCIAL RIGHTS OR GOODWILL ETC. AS THE ASSESSEE HAD CLAIMED ONLY THE DEPRECIATION AMOUNTING TO RS.13,46,78,733/- ON THE ABOVE STATED PAYMENT HENCE THE CLAIM OF SUCH DEPRECIATION IS HEREBY DISALLOWED. 16. THE LD. CIT (A) CONCURRED WITH THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER HOLDING THAT THE VALUATION OF ASSETS TRANSF ERRED WITHOUT ANY BASIS AND HAS BEEN DONE TO CLAIM DEPRECIATION O N THE GOODWILL GENERATE. 17. WHILE OBSERVING SO, THE LD. CIT (A) HELD THAT T HERE IS NO DISPUTE REGARDING THE DEPRECIATION ON GOODWILL BUT WHETHER THE DEPRECIATION IS ALLOWABLE ON GOODWILL ACQUIRED PURS UANT TO A SCHEME OF SLUMP SALE WHICH IS APPLICABLE TO THE CAS E OF THE ASSESSEE. THE LD. CIT (A) HELD THAT, EFFECTIVELY WHAT WAS TRANSFERRED IS ONLY THE BUSINESS UNDERTAKING PERTAI NING TO SALE OF FF OIL TO THE OEMC WHILE THE OTHER TWO DIVISIONS OF TWO NAMELY VIDEOL AND MANUFACTURING OF FF OIL CONTINUES WITH AND MARKETING OF SF OIL OF ENIOS CONTINUES TO BE WITH TWO LTD. WHILE COMING TO SUCH CONCLUSION, THE LD. CIT (A) RE LIED UPON THE VARIOUS CLAUSES OF BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT WHIC H ARE AS UNDER: TWO SHALL TRANSFER THE BUSINESS UNDERTAKING RELATIN G TO SALE OF FF AND SF OIL TO OEMS NAMELY ENEOS BUSINES S SEGMENT BY WAY OF SLUMP SALE (AS DEFINED U/S 2(4 2C) OF THE ACT) FOR CONSIDERATION OF INR 108 CRORES. TWO SHALL TRANSFER TO THE ASSESSEE ALL ITS BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE OEMS AS MENTIONED ABOVE RELA TING TO SUPPLY OF FF OILS TO SUCH OEMS. ALSO, TWO AND THE ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 12 ASSESSEE WOULD ENTER INTO A SEPARATE AGREEMENT NAME LY MANUFACTURING AGREEMENT WHEREBY TWO HAS AGREED TO ACT AS A TOLL MANUFACTURER OF FF OILS. TWO SHALL HA VE NO RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE ANY SERVICES OR ASSUME AN Y LIABILITY IN RELATION TO THE SUPPLY OF FF OILS TO O EMS. TWO SHALL TRANSFER TO ASSESSEE CERTAIN ASSETS EXCLU SIVELY USED FOR THE ENEOS BUSINESS SEGMENT. THESE ASSETS ONLY INCLUDES STORAGE TANK INSTALLED AT HONDA CAR PREMIS ES. THUS THE ONLY ASSET TRANSFERRED WAS A STORAGE TANK INSTALLED AT HONDA CAR PREMISES. AS A PART OF BTA, TWO AND THE ASSESSEE ENTERED INTO A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WHEREBY TWO HAS AGREED TO BE APPOINTED AS INDUSTRIAL FRANCHISEE OF THE ASSESSEE IN RESPECT OF THE SF OILS BUSINESS. THUS, TWO WILL BE MANUFACTURING SF OILS AND PROVIDE WAREHOUSE & LOGIS TICS, SALES, INVOICING, ACCOUNTING & COLLECTION FOR THE S F OILS BUSINESS. TWO SHALL ALSO DISTRIBUTE AND SELL SUCH SF OILS USI NG ITS SALES AND DISTRIBUTION NETWORK AND SALES AND DISTRI BUTION NETWORK OF OEMS. ASSESSEE WOULD UNDERTAKE THE MARKE TING ACTIVITIES RELATING TO SF OILS AND PROVIDE TWO WITH CERTAIN STRATEGIC SUPPORT AND SERVICES IN RELATION TO UNDER TAKING OF THE SFS OILS BUSINESS. 18. BEFORE US DURING THE ARGUMENT, THE LD. AR REITE RATED THE SUBMISSION FILED BEFORE THE LD. CIT (A). 1) THE ASSESSEE IS ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF MARKETIN G, DISTRIBUTING, SELLING, MANUFACTURING THROUGH GRANTI NG SUB LICENSES OR TOLL MANUFACTURING OF FACTORY FILL AND SERVICE FILL ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 13 LUBRICATING OILS FOR AUTOMOBILES, MOTORCYCLES AND CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT TO BE FED INTO THE ORIGINAL MACHINERY OR EQUIPMENT (OEMS) AT CUSTOMERS FACTORIES OR DISTRIBUTED INTO THE RETAIL MARKET THROUGH DISTRIBUTORS OR DEALERS. A) TIDE WATER OIL COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED (TWO) TWO IS ONE OF THE LEADING MANUFACTURERS AND MARKETE RS OF LUBRICANTS IN INDIA. IT IS A COMPANY WHICH IS LI STED ON THE BOTH THE INDIAN STOCK EXCHANGES NSE AND BSE. TWO IS CATERING TO THE AUTOMOTIVE AND INDUSTRIAL SEGMENTS SINCE 1928. BEFORE THE FORMATION OF ASSESS EE COMPANY, TWO WAS ENGAGED IN MANUFACTURING, MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTS IN INDIA UND ER TWO BUSINESS SEGMENT: I) VEEDOL - OWNED BY TWO; AND II) ENEOS A OEM BUSINESS SEGMENT UNDER THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OF JX NOE THE EXTENSIVE DISTRIBUTION NETWORK CONSISTS OF 50 DISTRIBUTORS AND OVER 650 DIRECT DEALERS SERVICING OVER 50,000 RETAIL OUTLETS. THE NETWORK IS FED BY 5 PLAN TS AND OVER 55 DEPOTS LOCATED STRATEGICALLY ACROSS THE COU NTRY. ITS REPERTOIRE OF AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTS INCLUDES ENGI NE OILS FOR TRUCKS, TRACTORS, COMMERCIAL VEHICLES, PAS SENGER CARS, AND TWO/THREE WHEELERS. IT ALSO PRODUCES GEAR OILS, TRANSMISSION OILS, COOLANTS, AND GREASES FOR AUTOMO BILES. FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION IT MANUFACTURES INDUSTRI AL OILS, ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 14 GREASES, AND SPECIALTY PRODUCTS LIKE METAL WORKING FLUIDS, QUENCHING OILS, AND HEAT TRANSFER OILS. B) JX NIPPON OIL & ENERGY CORPORATION ((JX NOE) JXNOE (NOW RENAMED JXTG NIPPON OIL AND ENERGY CORPORATION) IS A FULLY INTEGRATED PETROLEUM PRODUC TS COMPANY, HEADQUARTERED IN TOKYO, JAPAN AND IS A PAR T OF JXTG GROUP. JXTG HOLDINGS INC. A COMPANY LISTED ON TOKYO STOCK EXCHANGE. JXTG GROUP OFFERS PETROLEUM PRODUCTS AND SERVICES THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. THROUGH PARTNERSHIPS WITH WOR LD CLASS CUSTOMERS, JX NOE PRODUCES TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED MOTOR OILS AND TRANSMISSION FLUIDS THAT RE DUCE CARBON EMISSIONS, IMPROVE FUEL ECONOMY AND REDUCE WEAR ON CRITICAL COMPONENTS. ENEOS IS THE BRAND NAME FOR PRODUCTS MANUFACTURED AND SOLD BY JX NOE, THE LARGEST OIL COMPANY IN JAPA N. ENEOS PRODUCTS ARE THE HIGH QUALITY LUBRICANTS AVAI LABLE IN THE MARKETPLACE TODAY. 19. OVER THE PERIOD, TWO ENTERED INTO AGREEMENTS WI TH VARIOUS TWO WHEELERS AUTOMOBILE COMPANIES AS WELL A S CERTAIN NON-AUTOMOTIVE CLIENTS (OEMS). PURSUANT TO THESE AG REEMENTS, OEMS HAVE GRANTED TO TWO, RIGHT AND LICENSE TO USE CERTAIN TRADEMARKS AND OTHER RELATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF SUCH OEMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MANUFACTURING, MARKETING, DI STRIBUTING AND/OR SELLING THE ENEAS OIL. THE LISTS OF CLIENTS BEING SERVED BY TWO WERE AS UNDER: ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 15 HONDA MOTORCYCLE & SCOOTER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED HERO MOTOCORP LIMITED HONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LIMITED INDIA YAMAHA MOTOR PRIVATE LIMITED HONDA SIEL CARS INDIA LIMITED KOBELCO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITE D KOBELCO CRANES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED HONDA MOTOR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED KUBOTA AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ISUZU MOTORS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED NISSAN MOTOR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PRIVATE LIMITED MITSUBISHI MOTOR CORPORATION SML ISUZU LIMITED HYUNDAI MOTOR INDIA LIMITED HYUNDAI CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITE D MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED TATA HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY COMPANY LIMITED GEORGE MAIJO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED (YAMALUBE PRODUCTS) 20. EXCERPTS OF BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT (BTA) - IN VIEW OF EXPANDING LUBRICANT MARKET IN INDIA AND INCREASE OF JAPANESE AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS IN INDIA, JXNOE ESTABLISHE D A JOINT VENTURE ALONGWITH TWO TO TRANSFER THE BUSINESS SEGM ENT RELATED TO ENEOS RANGE OF PRODUCTS I.E. THE OEM BUSINESS SEGMENT, CONSIDERING THE SAME, THE ASSESSEE COMPANY WAS INCO RPORATED AND OEM BUSINESS SEGMENT NAMELY ENEOS BUSINESS SEGM ENT WAS ACQUIRED BY THE ASSESSEE COMPANY FROM TWO FOR A CON SIDERATION OF RS.108 CRORES VIDE BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT ( BTA) DATED ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 16 24 TH SEPTEMBER 2014 (COPY OF AGREEMENT IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE 7 OF PAPER BOOK). FURTHER, CONSIDERING THE LARGE MANUFACTURING FACILITIES AVAILABLE WITH TWO AND ITS EXISTING DISTRIBUTION NETWORK, AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF SUCH T RANSFER OF BUSINESS UNDERTAKING, FOLLOWING TERMS WERE AGREED U PON BETWEEN TWO AND JX NIPPON I.E. THE ASSESSEE VIDE TH IS BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT: TWO SHALL TRANSFER THE BUSINESS UNDERTAKING RELATIN G TO SALE OF FF AND SF OIL TO OEMS NAMELY ENEOS BUSINES S SEGMENT BY WAY OF SLUMP SALE (AS DEFINED U/S 2(2 4C) OF THE ACT) FOR CONSIDERATION OF INR 108 CRORES. TWO SHALL TRANSFER TO THE ASSESSEE ALL ITS BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE OEMS AS MENTIONED ABOVE RELA TING TO SUPPLY OF FF OILS TO SUCH OEMS. ALSO, TWO AND ASSES SEE WOULD ENTER INTO A SEPARATE AGREEMENT NAMELY MANUFACTURING AGREEMENT WHEREBY TWO HAS AGREED TO ACT AS A TOLL MANUFACTURER OF FF OILS. TWO SHALL HA VE NO RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE ANY SERVICES OR ASSUME AN Y LIABILITY IN RELATION TO THE SUPPLY OF FF OILS TO O EMS. TWO SHALL TRANSFER TO ASSESSEE CERTAIN ASSETS EXCLU SIVELY USED FOR THE ENEOS BUSINESS SEGMENT. THESE ASSETS ONLY INCLUDES STORAGE TANK INSTALLED AT HONDA CAR PREMIS ES. AS A PART OF BTA, TWO AND THE ASSESSEE ENTERED INTO A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WHEREBY TWO HAS AGREED TO BE APPOINTED AS INDUSTRIAL FRANCHISEE OF THE ASSESSEE IN RESPECT OF THE SF OILS BUSINESS THUS, TWO WILL BE MANUFACTURING SF OILS AND PROVIDE WAREHOUSE & LOGIS TICS, SALES, INVOICING, ACCOUNTING & COLLECTION FOR THE S F OILS BUSINESS. ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 17 TWO SHALL ALSO DISTRIBUTE AND SELL SUCH SF OILS USI NG ITS SALES AND DISTRIBUTION NETWORK AND SALES AND DISTRI BUTION NETWORK OF OEMS. ASSESSEE WOULD UNDERTAKE THE MARKE TING ACTIVITIES RELATING TO SF OILS AND PROVIDE TWO WITH CERTAIN STRATEGIC SUPPORT AND SERVICES IN RELATION TO UNDER TAKING OF THE SFS OILS BUSINESS. THUS, BY VIRTUE OF THE ABOVE AGREEMENTS ASSESSEE HA S BEEN ABLE TO TAKE CARE OF THE MANUFACTURING AS WELL MARKETING ACTIVITIES AS PART OF THE BTA. HAD TWO NO T AGREED FOR THE ABOVE FUNCTIONS IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE FO R THE ASSESSEE TO EARN PROFIT FROM DAY ONE. IN A COMPETIT IVE MARKET THE ASSESSEE WOULD HAVE INCURRED LOSSES FOR FIRST FEW YEARS TO MAKE AN ENTRY INTO A NEW SEGMENT, DEVE LOP ITS REPUTATION AND BRAND. THUS, THE ASSESSEE HAS GO T A HUGE BENEFIT IN TERMS OF THEBTA. TWO SHALL DOING THE SAME ON A RISK NEUTRAL BASIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTION PLAN S PREPARED BY THE ASSESSEE IN CONSULTATION WITH TWO, ASSESSEE SHALL ASSUME THE RISK OF THE SF OIL BUSINE SS INCLUDING THE RISK OF ANY UNSOLD INVENTORY MANUFACT URED BY TWO IN ACCORDANCE WITH FRANCHISE AGREEMENT. 21. WITH REGARD TO THE BUSINESS VALUATION, IT WAS S UBMITTED THAT THE VALUE BASED ON DETAILED BUSINESS VALUATION CARRIED OUT BY A REPUTED FIRM OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS. 22. OWING TO BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT ALL EXISTI NG CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS WITH OEMS WITH REGARD TO ENE OS BUSINESS SEGMENT (SF & FF) WERE TRANSFERRED TO THE ASSESSEE. ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 18 23. IT WAS ARGUED THAT THE BUSINESS VALUATION WAS C ARRIED OUT ON THE BASIS OF INCOME APPROACH I.E. DISCOUNTED CAS H FLOW (DCF) METHOD, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION THE FUTURE REVENUES EXPECTED TO BE GENERATED OUT OF THE SAID BUSINESS S EGMENT FROM THE CUSTOMERS OF TWO WHO WILL BECOME CUSTOMERS OF J V I.E. THE APPELLANT. 24. IT WAS ARGUED THAT THE PROFIT ESTIMATED AT THE TIME OF VALUATION, HAS BEEN ACTUALLY ACHIEVED BY THE ASSESS ED WHICH SHOWS THE ACCURACY OF ESTIMATION AND VALUATION. IT WAS ARGUED THAT THE ASSESSED HAS ALSO ACQUIRED INTANGIBLE ASSETS BY WAY OF BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT SUCH AS TRANSFER OF EXI STING OEM BUSINESS RELATING TO SF AND FF OIL, RIGHT TO USE MA NUFACTURING FACILITIES TO TWO, RIGHT TO USE CUSTOMER DATA BASE TO GET SALES SUPPORT SERVICES FROM TWO. 25. THE LD. AR ALSO SUBMITTED THE DETAILS OF PROFIT S AND SUBSEQUENT TO THE BTA, WHICH IS AS UNDER: 2014 - 15 RS.1.95 CRORES 2015 - 16 RS.20.1 CRORES 2016 - 17 RS.20.2 CRORES 2017 - 18 RS.28.6 CRORES 26. ON THE BASIS OF THE RESULT, IT WAS ARGUED THAT THE VALUATION HAS BEEN RIGHTLY UNDERTAKEN AND THE PAYMENTS WERE J USTIFIED EVEN BASED ON THE PROFITS EARNED SUBSEQUENTLY TO TH E TUNE OF RS.70.8 CRORES IN LESS THAN FOUR YEARS. IT WAS ALSO ARGUED THAT THE PAYMENT MADE BY THE ASSESSEE OF RS.108 CRORES H AS BEEN DULY OFFERED TO TAX BY THE RECIPIENT TWO AND LONG TERM CAPITAL GAIN OF RS.24.43 CRORES HAS BEEN PAID. FURTHER, IT WAS ARGUED ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 19 THAT SINCE THE GOODWILL IS CLASSIFIED AS AN INTANGI BLE ASSETS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 32(1)(II) OF THE ACT, THE DEPRECIATION HAS BEEN RIGHTLY CLAIMED. 27. HEARD THE ARGUMENTS OF BOTH THE PARTIES AND PER USED THE MATERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. 28. ON GOING THROUGH THE ENTIRE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTA NCES, THE ISSUE TO BE DECIDED BEFORE US AS DETERMINED IS WHE THER THE PAYMENT MADE BY THE ASSESSEE OF RS.108 CRORES FOR B USINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT (BTA) TO TIDE WATER OIL COMPANY (INDIA) LTD. (A LISTED COMPANY) IS EXCESS AND IF SO WHETHER THE GOODWILL RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS OVE R AND ABOVE THE VALUE OF THE NET ASSET OBTAINED OUT OF SUCH AGR EEMENT IS CORRECT AS PER THE ACCOUNTING STANDARD AND IF SO WH ETHER SUCH GOODWILL RAISED IS ELIGIBLE FOR DEPRECIATION U/S 32 (1)(II) OF THE I.T. ACT 29. WITH REGARD TO THE AMOUNT PAID BY THE ASSESSEE FOR BTA, WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE VALUATION REPORT. VALUATION OF THE TWO-EBS: 30. WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE REPORT OF THE PWC DATE D 14.07.2014 WHICH WENT THROUGH THE VALUE ANALYSIS BY TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION WHERE AVERAGE COST OF THE CAPITA L AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE EBS. THE TWO HOLDING STRUCTURE CONSISTS OF 26% OF THE COMPANY ANDREW YULE & CO. LTD . AS PROMOTER, INSTITUTIONAL PUBLIC SHARE HOLDING AT 14% AND NON- INSTITUTIONAL PUBLIC SHAREHOLDING OF THE REMAINING 60%. THE COMPANY IS LISTED IN BSE AND NSE AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 20 CASE MANUFACTURES AND MARKETS LUBRICANTS UNDER THE BRAND ENEOS. THE TWO HAS MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION N ETWORK OF 100 DISTRIBUTORS, 300 DEALERS AND 20000 SUB-DEALERS ACROSS INDIA. THE BRAND WAS ESTABLISHED IN 2001 AND OWNED BY JX AND OE WHICH ARE SOLD BY THE COMPANY TWO TO OEMS. THE G ROWTH RATE OF THE ENEOS SEGMENT HAS BEEN 32 TO 44% FROM THE FINANCIAL YEARS 2010 TO 2012 WITH COMPOUND GROWTH R ATE OF 37%. THE MARKET SHARE OF FACTORY FIELDS INCREASED F ROM 28 TO 39% HISTORICALLY, PRE-AGREEMENT. THE OPERATIVE MARG INS RANGING FROM 8.7 TO 11% OVER A PERIOD 3 YEARS AFTER CONSIDE RING VARIOUS APPROACHES NAMELY INCOME APPROACH, MARKET MULTIPLE APPROACH, NET ASSET VALUE APPROACH. THE ASSESSEE ACCEPTED THE INCOME APPROACH OTHERWISE CALLED AS DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW M ETHOD FOR VALUATION OF THE EBS. BASED ON THAT THE SPECIFIED B USINESS, FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE HAS BEEN PROJECTED AT WITH EB ITDA MARGIN VARYING FROM 6.6 TO 7.1%. BASED ON THE FORECAST, TH E OPERATING INCOME, POST TAX WAS ESTIMATED AT RS.98 TO 184 MILL IONS PER YEAR OVER A PERIOD OF 5 YEARS. ACCORDING TO MARKET MULTIPLE APPROACH, THE VALUE RANGE WAS DETERMINED AT RS.987 TO 1062 MILLIONS. THE VALUATION REPORT HAS ALSO TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION, THE GUIDELINES COMPANIES SUCH AS GULF OIL CORPORATI ON LTD. AND CASTROL INDIA LTD. 31. THE TAXABLE INCOME OF THE TWO WAS RS.214 CROR ES FOR THE A.Y. 2015-16 WHICH INCLUDED THE TAX ON THE LONG TERM CAPITAL GAINS. NO PRUDENT BUSINESSMEN WOULD TRANSFE R A RUNNING BUSINESS AT NET ASSET VALUE (RS. 25.7 LAKHS IN PRES ENT CASE) WHICH IS GIVING RETURN OF RS.70.89 CRORES WITHIN JU ST 3.5 YEARS OF TRANSFER. THE INCOME EARNED BY THE ASSESSEE POST BTA WAS TO THE TUNE OF RS.70 CRORES OVER A PERIOD OF 3 YEARS A GAINST THE ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 21 PURCHASE VALUE OF BTA OF RS.108 CRORES. THE PROOF O F THE PUDDING IS IN THE EATING. THUS, WE FIND THAT THE PR ICE PAID BY THE ASSESSEE FOR ENTERING INTO BTA CANNOT BE SUSPEC TED OR ALLEGED TO BE WITH ANY OTHER MOTIVE. 32. NOW, HAVING DETERMINED THAT THE PRICE PAID BY T HE ASSESSEE FOR BTA CANNOT BE DISPUTED, THE ISSUE TO B E EXAMINED IS WHETHER THE ACTION OF THE ASSESSEE TO RAISE GOOD WILL OF RS.107.75 CRORES ON ACCOUNT OF BTA BEING THE DIFFER ENCE IN THE PAYMENT OF CONSIDERATION OF RS.108 CRORES AND IN TH E NET BOOK VALUE OF THE ASSETS OF RS.25.75 LACS TRANSFERRED TO THE ASSESSEE. 33. BUSINESS GOODWILL IS AN INTANGIBLE ASSET OWNED BY AND ASSOCIATED WITH THE OPERATION OF A COMPANY. GOODWIL L IS THE PREMIUM THAT IS PAID WHEN A BUSINESS IS ACQUIRED. I F A BUSINESS IS ACQUIRED FOR MORE THAN ITS BOOK VALUE, IT CAN BE SAID THAT THE ACQUIRING BUSINESS IS PAYING FOR INTANGIBLE ITEMS S UCH AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, BRAND RECOGNITION, AND CUSTO MER LOYALTY. BUSINESS GOODWILL IS AN INTANGIBLE ASSET THAT ADDS VALUE TO A COMPANY. FACTORS SUCH AS PROPRIETARY OR INTELLECTUA L PROPERTY AND BRAND RECOGNITION ARE REFLECTED IN GOODWILL. WHILE GOODWILL IS NOT EASILY QUANTIFIABLE, IT IS CALCULATED BY SUB TRACTING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF A COMPA NY'S ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FROM ITS PURCHASE PRICE. COMPANIES MUST RECORD THE VALUE OF GOODWILL ON THEIR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RECORD ANY IMPAIRMENT. 34. THE PRESENCE OF GOODWILL IMPLIES THAT A COMPAN Y'S VALUE IS GREATER THAN ITS COMBINED RAW ASSETS. THE EFFECT OF GOODWILL ON A COMPANY'S VALUE IS BETTER UNDERSTOOD BY LEARNING THE FACTORS ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 22 THAT CREATE BUSINESS GOODWILL. THE THREE FACTORS IN THE CREATION OF A COMPANY'S GOODWILL INCLUDE ITS GOING CONCERN V ALUE, EXCESS BUSINESS INCOME, AND THE EXPECTATION OF FUTURE ECON OMIC BENEFITS. 1. THE GOING CONCERN VALUE INDICATES THAT THE COMPANY CAN PRODUCE INCOME BY APPLYING EXISTING CAPITAL (EQUIPM ENT, EMPLOYEES, MANAGEMENT, AND RESOURCES) EFFECTIVELY. 2. THE EXCESS BUSINESS INCOME IMPLIES THAT A COMPANY I S EARNING ADDITIONAL INCOME DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF IT S GOODWILL. 3. THE OVERALL VALUE FURTHER INCREASES WHEN EXPECTATIO NS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH ARE ADDED TO THE EQUATION. 35. WHILE GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS ARE SO METIMES USED INTERCHANGEABLY, THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERE NCES BETWEEN THE TWO IN THE ACCOUNTING WORLD. 36. GOODWILL IS A PREMIUM PAID OVER THE FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS DURING THE PURCHASE OF A COMPANY. HENCE, IT IS TAGG ED TO A COMPANY OR BUSINESS AND CANNOT BE SOLD OR PURCHASED INDEPENDENTLY, WHEREAS OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS LIKE LICENSES, PATENTS, ETC. CAN BE SOLD AND PURCHASED INDEPENDENT LY. 37. THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS RESORTED TO EXPLANATI ON 3 TO SECTION 32(1) AND HELD THAT THE EXPRESSION ASSET SH ALL MEAN AN INTANGIBLE ASSET BEING KNOW-HOW, PATENTS, COPYRIGHT S, TRADEMARKS, LICENSES, FRANCHISES AND ANY OTHER BUSI NESS OR COMMERCIAL RIGHTS OF SIMILAR NATURE. THE AO REJECTE D THE CLAIM ON THE BASIS THAT GOODWILL WAS NOT AN INTANGIBLE ASSET. ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 23 38. ON GOING THROUGH THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE AP EX COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. SMIFS SECURITIES, WE HEREBY HOLD THAT GOODWILL WOULD FALL UNDER THE EXPRESSION ANY OTHE R BUSINESS OR COMMERCIAL RIGHT OF A SIMILAR NATURE AS PER SECTION 32(1)(II).RELIANCE IS PLACED ON THE FOLLOWING JUDGM ENTS 39. DHL LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED VS DCIT (ITAT MUM BAI) WE HAVE TO CONSIDER WHETHER GOODWILL IS AN INTANGI BLE ASSET UNDER SECTION 32, HENCE, ELIGIBLE FOR CLAIM OF DEPR ECIATION. IN OUR VIEW, THIS ISSUE IS NO MORE RES INTEGRA IN VIEW OF THE DECISION OF HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN SMIFS SECURITI ES LTD. (SUPRA) WHERE THE HONBLE SUPREME COURT HAS HELD TH AT GOODWILL IS IN THE NATURE OF ANY OTHER BUSINESS OR COMMERCIA L RIGHTS AS PROVIDED UNDER EXPLANATION3(B) OF SECTION 32(I) R/ W SECTION 32(1)(II). IN VIEW OF THE SAME ASSESSEE IS ELIGIBLE FOR DEPRECIATION ON GOODWILL RESULTING FROM ACQUISITION OF BUSINESS UNIT OF LEE & MUIRHEAD PVT. LTD. IN A.Y. 2008-09. 40. FROM THE PERUSAL OF THE ABOVE, IT IS EVIDENT TH AT THE INTANGIBLE ASSETS CHARACTERIZED GOODWILL AND ACQU IRED UNDER, THE BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEMENT ARE TOWARDS MIS, IN TERNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS, PROCEDURE & MANUAL, CRESA BRAND LO GO, COPYRIGHTS, CLIENT ACQUISITION COST, CERTAIN CORPOR ATE SERVICE AND NON-COMPETE FEE. THE AO HAS TAKEN THE VIEW THAT THE SE WOULD NOT CONSTITUTE GOODWILL FOR THE REASONS (A) THAT TH ERE COULD NOT HAVE BEEN ANY GOOD IN MICRO FINANCE BUSINESS RELATE D TO UNORGANIZED SECTOR (B) BOTH THE ENTITIES ARE UNDER SAME CONTROL & MANAGEMENT (C) NOT SHOWN IN THE BALANCE SHEET OF THE SOCIETY (D) NOT FALLING WITHIN THE PURVIEW OF SEC.32. ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 24 41. IN THIS REGARD, IT IS RELEVANT TO UNDERSTAND WH AT CONSTITUTES GOODWILL. THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF DEL HI IN THE CASE OF AREVA T&D INDIA LTD. &ORS. VS. DCIT (345 ITR 421 ) HAS DISCUSSED THE NATURE OF GOODWILL AND THE RELEVANT D ISCUSSION IS EXTRACTED AS UNDER: 42. IN THIS REGARD, IT WOULD NOT BE OUT OF PLACE TO REFER TO THE DECISION IN CIT VS B.C. SRINIVASA SETTY [1981] 128 ITR 294 (SC) WHEREIN THE CONCEPT OF GOODWILL HAS BEEN UNDERSTOOD IN THE FOLLOWING TERMS: GOODWILL DENOTES THE BENEFIT ARISING FROM CONNECTI ON AND REPUTATION. THE ORIGINAL DEFINITION BY LORD ELDON I N CRUTTWELL V. LYE [1810] 17 VES 335 THAT GOODWILL WAS NOTHING MORE THAN THE PROBABILITY THAT THE OLD CUSTOMERS WOULD RESORT TO THE OLD PLACES WAS EXPANDED BY WOOD V.C. IN CHURTO N V. DOUGLAS [1859] JOHN 174 TO ENCOMPASS EVERY POSITIVE ADVANTAGE THAT HAS BEEN ACQUIRED BY THE OLD FIRM I N CARRYING ON ITS BUSINESS, WHETHER CONNECTED WITH TH E PREMISES IN WHICH THE BUSINESS WAS PREVIOUSLY CARRI ED ON OR WITH THE NAME OF THE OLD FIRM, OR WITH ANY OTHER MA TTER CARRYING WITH IT THE BENEFIT OF THE BUSINESS. IN T REGO V. HUNT [1896] AC 7 (HL.) LORD HERSCHEL] DESCRIBED GOO DWILL AS A CONNECTION WHICH TENDED TO BECOME PERMANENT BECAU SE OF HABIT OR OTHERWISE. THE BENEFIT TO THE BUSINESS VAR IES WITH THE NATURE OF THE BUSINESS AND ALSO FROM ONE BUSINE SS TO ANOTHER. NO BUSINESS COMMENCED FOR THE FIRST TIME POSSESSES GOODWILL FROM THE START. IT IS GENERATED AS THE BUSINESS IS CARRIED OR AND MAY BE AUGMENTED WITH TH E PASSAGE OF TIME. LAWSON IN HIS INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 25 PROPERTY DESCRIBES IT AS PROPERTY OF A HIGHLY PECUL IAR KIND. IN CIT V. CHUNILAL PRABHUDAS & CO. [1970] 76 ITR 56 6 THE CALCUTTA HIGH COURT REVIEWED THE DIFFERENT APPROACH ES TO THE CONCEPT (PP.577, 578) TO QUOTE THE HONBLE COURT: THOUGH IMMATERIAL, IT IS MATERIALLY VALUED. PHYSIC ALLY AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY, IT IS A HABIT AND SOCIOLOGICALLY IT IS A CUSTOM. BIOLOGICALLY, IT HAS BEEN DESCRIBED BY LO RD MACNAGHTEN IN TREGO V. HUNT [1896] AC 7 [HL] AS THE SAP AND LIFE OF THE BUSINESS. ARCHITECTURALLY, IT HAS BEEN DESCRIBED AS THE CEMENT BINDING TOGETHER THE BUSI NESS AND ITS ASSETS AS A WHOLE AND A GOING AND DEVELOPING CO NCERN. 43. GOODWILL IS COMMONLY UNDERSTOOD AS FUTURE BENEF ITS FROM ASSETS THAT ARE NOT CAPABLE OF BEING BOTH INDIVIDUA LLY IDENTIFIED AND SPECIFICALLY RECOGNIZED. GOODWILL AS DEFINED IN LEXIS NEX IN TAX LAW. DICTIONARY IS AS UNDER (DISCUSSED BY THE H ONBLE ITAT, DELHI IN THE CASE OF CYBER INDIA ONLINE LTD VS ACIT ) SHOULD BE RECORDED IN THE BOOKS ONLY WHEN SOME CONSIDERATION IN MONEY OR MONEYS WORTH HAS BEEN PAID FOR IT. WHENEVER BUS INESS IS ACQUIRED FOR A PRICE (PAYABLE IN CASH OR IN SHARES OR OTHERWISE) WHICH IS IN EXCESS OF THE VALUE OF THE NET ASSETS O F THE BUSINESS TAKEN OVER THE EXCESS SHOULD BE TERMED AS GOODWILL 44. ANY EXCESS OF COST OVER THE FAIR VALUE OF THE N ET ASSETS ACQUIRED IS RECORDED AS GOODWILL. IN ERIC KOBLERS: A DICTIONARY FOR ACCOUNTANTS, THE TERM GOODWILL HAS BEEN DEFINED AS: ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 26 THE CURRENT VALUE OF EXPECTED FUTURE INCOME IN EXC ESS OF A NORMAL RETURN ON THE INVESTMENT IN NET TANGIBLE ASS ETS NOT AS A RECORDED OR REPORTED AMOUNT UNLESS PAID FOR. T HE EXCESS OF THE PRICE PAID FOR A BUSINESS AS A WHILE OVER ITS BOOK VALUE OR OVER THE COMPUTED OR AGREED VALUE OF ALL TANGIBLE NET ASSETS PURCHASED. 45. THE NEXT ISSUE ARISES WHETHER THE IMPUGNED INTA NGIBLE RIGHTS ACQUIRED UNDER THE BUSINESS TRANSFER AGREEME NT WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR DEPRECIATION UNDER SECTION 32(1)(II ). IN THIS REGARD, IT IS RELEVANT TO REFER TO THE DISCUSSION O F THE HONBLE APEX COURT ON THE ISSUE WHETHER GOODWILL IS AN ASSE T WITHIN THE MEANING OF SEC.32 OF THE I.T. ACT. THE HONBLE APEX COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. SMIFS SECURITIES 348 ITR 302 DI SCUSSED AS UNDER: QUESTION NO.[B] WHETHER GOODWILL IS AN ASSET WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 32 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 AND WHETHER DEPRECIATIO N ON GOODWILL IS ALLOWABLE UNDER THE SAID SECTION: ANSWER: IN THE PRESENT CASE, THE ASSESSE HAD CLAIMED THE DE DUCTION OF RS. 54,85,430/- AS DEPRECIATION ON GOODWILL. IN THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE EXPLANATION REGARDING ORIGIN OF SUCH G OODWILL WAS GIVEN AS UNDER: IN ACCORDANCE WITH SCHEME OF AMALGAMATION OF YSN S HARES & SECURITIES (P) LTD WITH SMIFS SECURITIES LTD (DULY SANCTIONED BY HONBLE HIGH COURTS OF BOMBAY AND CALCUTTA) WITH RE TROSPECTIVE EFFECT FROM 1ST APRIL, 1998, ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF YSN SHARES ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 27 & SECURITIES (P) LTD WERE TRANSFERRED TO AND VEST I N THE COMPANY. IN THE PROCESS GOODWILL HAS ARISEN IN THE BOOKS OF THE COMPANY. 46. IT WAS FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT EXCESS CONSIDERAT ION PAID BY THE ASSESSEE OVER THE VALUE OF NET ASSETS ACQUIRED OF YSN SHARES AND SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED [AMALGAMATING COMPANY] SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS GOODWILL ARISING ON AMALGAM ATION. IT WAS CLAIMED THAT THE EXTRA CONSIDERATION WAS PAID T OWARDS THE REPUTATION WHICH THE AMALGAMATING COMPANY WAS ENJOY ING IN ORDER TO RETAIN ITS EXISTING CLIENTELE. 47. THE ASSESSING OFFICER HELD THAT THE GOODWILL WA S NOT AN ASSET FALLING UNDER EXPLANATION 3 TO SECTION 32 (1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 [ACT FOR SHORT]. 48. WE QUOTE HEREIN BELOW EXPLANATION 3 TO SECTION 32(1) OF THE ACT: EXPLANATION 3 FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS S UB-SECTION, THE EXPRESSIONS ASSETS AND BLOCK OF ASSETS SHAL L MEAN [A] TANGIBLE ASSETS, BEING BUILDINGS, MACHINERY, PL ANT OR FURNITURE; [B] INTANGIBLE ASSETS, BEING KNOW-HOW, PATENTS, COP YRIGHTS, TRADEMARKS, LICENSES, FRANCHISES OR ANY OTHER BUSIN ESS OR COMMERCIAL RIGHTS OF SIMILAR NATURE. EXPLANATION 3 STATES THAT THE EXPRESSION ASSET SH ALL MEAN AN INTANGIBLE ASSET, BEING KNOW-HOW, PATENTS, COPYRIGH TS; TRADEMARKS, LICENSES, FRANCHISES OR ANY OTHER BUSI NESS OR COMMERCIAL RIGHTS OF SIMILAR NATURE. A READING THE WORDS ANY OTHER BUSINESS OR COMMERCIAL RIGHTS OF SIMILAR NATU RE IN CLAUSE ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 28 (B) OF EXPLANATION 3 INDICATES THAT GOODWILL WOULD FALL UNDER THE EXPRESSION ANY OTHER BUSINESS OR COMMERCIAL RIGHT OF A SIMILAR NATURE; THE PRINCIPLE OF EJUSDEM GENERIS WOULD STRI CTLY APPLY WHILE INTERPRETING THE SAID EXPRESSION WHICH FINDS PLACE IN EXPLANATION 3(B). 49. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT GOODWILL IS AN ASSET UNDER EXPLANATION 3(B) TO SECTION 32(1) OF THE ACT. THE HONBLE APEX COURT HELD THAT ONE MORE ASPECT NEEDS TO BE HIGHLIGHTED. IN THE PRE SENT CASE, THE ASSESSING OFFICER, AS A MATTER OF FACT, CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT NO AMOUNT WAS ACTUALLY PAID ON ACCOUNT OF GOODWILL. TH IS IS A FACTUAL FINDING. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) [ CIT(A), FOR SHORT] HAS COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE AUTHORIZ ED REPRESENTATIVES HAD FILED COPIES OF THE ORDERS OF T HE OF THE HIGH COURT ORDERING AMALGAMATION OF THE ABOVE TWO COMPAN IES; THAT THE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF M/S. YSN SHARES AND SECUR ITIES PRIVATE LIMITED WERE TRANSFERRED TO THE ASSESSEE FOR A CONS IDERATION; THAT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE COST OF AN ASSET AND THE AMOUNT PAID CONSTITUTED GOODWILL AND THAT THE ASSESSEE COMPANY IN THE PROCESS OF AMALGAMATION HAD ACQUIRED A CAPITAL RIGHT IN THE FORM OF GOODWILL BECAUSE OF WHICH THE MARKET WORTH OF THE ASSESSEE- COMPANY STOOD INCREASED. THIS FINDING HAS ALSO BEEN UPHELD BY INC OME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. WE SEE NO REASON TO INTERFERE WITH THE FA CTUAL FINDING. 50. IN THE INSTANT CASE ,THE REVENUE HAS TAKEN THE VIEW THAT THE IMPUGNED INTANGIBLE RIGHTS DO NOT FALL WITHIN T HE PURVIEW OF ANY OF THE CLAUSES OF SEC.32(1) AND IS NOT IN THE NATURE OF COMMERCIAL OR BUSINESS RIGHT SO AS TO BE ELIGIBLE TO CLAIM DEPRECATION U/S 32. ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 29 51. IN THIS REGARD, IT IS RELEVANT TO REFER TO THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE ITAT, HYDERABAD BENCH IN THE CASE OF M/S SK S MICRO FINANCE LTD. 52. THE FACTS IN THAT CASE ARE THAT THE ASSESSEE CO MPANY ACQUIRED THE MICRO FINANCE BUSINESS FROM THE SOCIET Y SWAYAMKRISHISANGAM AND HAS PAID RS 3.97 CRORES TOWA RDS CUSTOMER COSTS, ONE TIME REIMBURSEMENT OF RS.82 LAK H TOWARDS COST OF INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND TOWARDS CORPORATE, SERVICES INCLUDING STRATEGIC PLA NNING, MARKET SURVEY, INTRODUCTION OF NEW PRODUCTS, IMPACT ASSESS MENT ETC. THE AO THEREIN TOOK THE VIEW THAT THE CLIENT ACQUIS ITION COST OF RS.3.97 CRORES WOULD NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR DEPRECIATI ON AS IT IS NOT IN THE NATURE OF INTANGIBLE ASSET OR IN THE NATURE OF COMMERCIAL BUSINESS RIGHTS. THE LD. CIT(A) IN THAT CASE TOOK T HE VIEW THAT THE CUSTOMER BASE ACQUIRED BY THE ASSESSEE CANNOT B E TERMED AS KNOW-HOW, PATENT, COPYRIGHT OR TRADEMARK OR FRAN CHISE; AND IT CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS LICENSE. OR BUSINESS OR COMMERCIAL, RIGHT OF SIMILAR NATURE AND RELIED ON THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. TECHNO SHA RES STOCKS LTD (225 CTR 337). THE HONBLE TRIBUNAL FOLLOWING T HE DECISION OF THE HONBLE DELHI HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF AREV A T&D INDIA LTD. & OTHERS (345 ITR 421) AND THE APEX COURT DECI SION IN THE CASE OF SMIFS SECURITIES LTD HELD THAT THE CLIENT A CQUISITION COST WOULD FALL WITHIN THE CATEGORY OF BUSINESS OR COMM ERCIAL RIGHTS REFERRED IN CLAUSE (II) OF SEC. 32(1) AND WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR DEPRECIATION. 53. DEPRECIATION COULD NOT BE DENIED TO THE TAXPAYE R MERELY FOR THE REASON THAT THE ASSETS WERE CLASSIFIED AS GOODWILL IN ITA NO. 4985/DEL/2019 SA NO. 985/DEL/2019 JX NIPPON TWO LUBRICANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. 30 THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNT WITHOUT APPRECIATING THE TRUE NATURE OF THE ASSETS IF THEY CAN FALL UNDER THE SCOPE OF ANY OTH ER BUSINESS OR COMMERCIAL RIGHTS OF SIMILAR NATURE. WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE SPECIFIED INTANGIBLE ASSETS ACQUIRED UNDER SLUMP SA LE AGREEMENT WERE IN THE NATURE OF BUSINESS OR COMMERCIAL RIGHT S OF SIMILAR NATURE SPECIFIED IN SECTION 32(1)(II) OF THE ACT A ND WERE ACCORDINGLY ELIGIBLE FOR DEPRECIATION UNDER THAT SE CTION. 54. OWING TO THE ENTIRE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE VIZ., THE VALUE PAID BY THE ASSESSEE, THE VALUATION REPORT, , THE PROFITS EARNED BY THE ASSESSEE, THE TAX PAYMENT BY THE RECIPIENT, THE RIGHT AND PROCESS OF THE ASSESSEE TO RAISE THE GOODWILL AND THE ACCOUNTING THEREOF, THE PROVISIONS RELATING TO DEPRECIATION ON INTANGIBLES, THE JUDGMENTS RELATING TO TREATING OF INTANGIBLES AS GOODWILL, IT CAN BE CONCLUDED TH AT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE COST OF THE ASSET AND THE CONSIDERATION PAID WOULD CONSTITUTE GOODWILL AND THAT GOODWILL IS AN ASSET ELIGIBLE FOR DEPRECIATION UNDE R SECTION 32(1)(II) OF THE I.T. ACT. 56. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS AL LOWED. 57. OWING TO THE DISPOSAL OF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSE SSEE, THE STAY APPLICATION NO. 985/DEL/2019 IS TREATED AS RED UNDANT. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 02/03/2021. SD/- SD/- (AMIT SHUKLA) (DR. B. R. R. KUMAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNT ANT MEMBER DATED: 02/03/2021 *SUBODH*