WIPRO LTD ( CMANGO (I) P LTD SINCE MERGED), BANGALORE V. ITO 10(1)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 4987/MUM/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2012] 119 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9007 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 2 month(s) 21 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 14-09-2012
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Next Hearing Date: 10-09-2012
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 23-06-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

PAGE 1 OF 3 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH G, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VIVEK VARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 4987/MUM/2011 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007-08) M/S. WIPRO LIMITED, (CMANGO (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED SINCE MERGED) DODDAKANMELLI, SARJAPUR ROAD, BANGALORE -560 035 PAN: AAACW 0387 R VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 10(1)(2), MUMBAI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MR. PAVAN VED DATE OF HEARING: 10-09-2012. DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 14-09-2012 O R D E R PER VIVEK VARMA, JM: THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER DATED 21.03.2011 OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INC OME-TAX (APPEALS)-21, MUMBAI. 2. THE APPEAL IN THIS CASE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 25 .06.2012 BUT WAS ADJOURNED TO 10.09.2012, AS NONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THE CASE WAS ULTIMATELY FIXED FOR HEARING FOR 10.09.2012, AND NOTICE WAS ISSUED ON 03.07.2012 BY RPAD FIXING THE NEXT DATE OF HEARING ON 10.09.2012. WHEN THE MATTER WAS CALLED U P FOR HEARING, M/S. WIPRO LIMITED. ITA NO. 4987/MUM/2011 PAGE 2 OF 3 NEITHER ANY ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESS EE NOR WAS ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT IS RECEIVED. IT SEEMS T HAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PURSUE ITS APPEAL FURTHER. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE ITAT, IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDI A LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 (DEL) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE MADHY A PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS CWT, REPORTED IN (1997) 223 ITR 480 (MP), THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED, FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION BY THE ASSESSEE. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS DAY OF 1 4/09/2012. SD/- SD/- (P.M. JAGTAP) (VIVEK VARMA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI : 14/09/2012 COPY TO: 1) THE APPELLANT 2) THE RESPONDENT 3) THE CIT (A)-21, MUMBAI. 4) THE CIT M.C.-X, MUMBAI 5) THE DR, G BENCH MUMBAI BY ORDER / / TRUE COPY / / ASST. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI *CHAVAN