Shri Snehal D. Pandya, Ahmedabad V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(4), Baroda

ITA 50/AHD/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 126 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6047 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 1 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-02-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 06-01-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ANUPAMA SINGLA

Judgement Text

, - IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH SMC BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ ITA NO. 50/AHD/2015 / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-11 SHRI SNEHAL D. PANDYA PROP. OF SHOIVAM ENTERPRISE & SHREEJI TRANSPORT CO. PLOT NO.607/1, OPP: BAYER DIAGNOSTIC NR. AJWA CROSSING N.H. NO.8 SAYAJIPURA, BARODA 390005. PAN : ACQPP 8396 N VS ITO, WARD-5(4) BARODA. / (APPELLANT) / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SMT.ANUPAMA SINGLA, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 15/02/2018 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 15/02/2018 O R D E R PRESENT APPEAL IS DIRECTED AT THE INSTANCE OF THE A SSESSEE AGAINST ORDER OF LD.CIT(A)-V, BARODA DATED 7.10.2014 PASSED FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR 2010-11. 2. IN RESPONSE TO THE NOTICE OF HEARING, SHRI ANIL R. SHAH APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. ON HIS REQUEST HEARING WAS ADJOURNED FROM TIME TO TIME. A LETTER DATED 5.2.2018 HAS BEEN FILED FR OM THE OFFICE OF SHRI ANIL R. SHAH CONTENDING THEREIN THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT RESPONDING TO HIS REQUEST AND NOT PROVIDING COMPLETE DETAILS. HE HAS WRITTEN A LETTER BY REGISTERED AD POST TO THE BRIEFING ADVOCATE POINTIN G OUT HIS INABILITY TO ITA NO.50/AHD/2015 - 2 - PURSUE THE MATTER IN THE ABSENCE OF DETAILS. ACCOR DINGLY, SHRI ANIL R. SHAH HAS WITHDRAWN HIS POWER ATTORNEY ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. HE HAS PLACED ON RECORD COPY OF THE LETTER WRITTEN BY HIM TO THE BRIEFING CA AS WELL AS REPLY OF SHRI YOGESH M. SHAH, CA WHO BRI EFED SHRI ANIL SHAH. CONSIDERING THE CORRESPONDENCES, I AM SATISFIED THA T THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING HER APPEAL BEFORE THE TRI BUNAL. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15 TH FEB., 2018. SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED, 15 /02/2018