Namit Devi Kothari, Churu V. DCIT, Central Circle-5, New Delhi

ITA 5004/DEL/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 118 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7417 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s) 24 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 09-01-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2005-2006
• Appeal Filed On: 16-07-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: S L ANURAGI

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : A+SMC , NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA , JUDICIAL M EMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO . 5004 /DE L/ 2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2005 - 06 SMT. NAMIT DEVI KOTHARI, SAMAR SADAN, SARDSHAHAR CHURU, CHURU, RAJASTHAN VS. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 5, NEW DELHI PAN : AFTPK7139L (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SHRI S.L. ANURAGI, SR.DR ORDER PER O.P. KANT, A .M. : THIS APPEAL, BY THE ASSESSEE, IS DIRECTED AGAINST ORDER OF CIT(A) - 24 , NEW DELHI , DATED 17.05.2018 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005 - 06 . 2. NONE PUT IN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE HEARING ON 09.01.2019 DESPITE ISSUE OF NOTICE ON 29.11.2018, THROUGH RPAD AT THE ADDRESS FURNISHED BY THE ASSESSEE IN COLUMN 10 OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL IN FORM NO. 36. THE ENVELOPE, CONTAINING THE NOTICE OF HEARING HAS RETUR NED UNSERVED WITH THE REMARK INS UFFICIENT ADDRESS . NO APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING HAS BEEN RECEIVED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. IT GIVES AN IMPRESSION THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING HER APPEAL. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS OF THE CASE AND KEEPING IN VIEW THE PROVISIO NS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE INCOME - TAX (APPELLATE TRIBUNAL) RULES, 1963 AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., (38 ITD 320)(DEL), THE ASSESSEE S APPEAL IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT (223 ITR 480) HAS HELD AS UNDER: 'IF THE PARTY, AT WHOSE INSTANCE THE REFERENCE IS MADE, FAILS 'TO APPEAR AT THE HEARING, OR FAILS IN TAKING STEPS FOR DATE OF HEARING 09.01.2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 09.01.2019 2 ITA NO. 5004/DEL/2018 PREPARATION OF THE PAP ER BOOKS SO AS TO ENABLE HEARING OF THE REFERENCE, THE COURT IS NOT BOUND TO ANSWER THE REFERENCE. ' 5. SIMILARLY, HON'BLE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF NEW DIWAN OIL MILLS VS. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495) RETURNED THE REFERENCE UNANSWERED SINCE THE ASSESSEE REMAINED ABSENT AND THERE WAS NOT ANY ASSISTANCE FROM THE ASSESSEE. 6. THEIR LORDSHIPS OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477 - 478) HELD THAT THE APPEAL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILING O F THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFFECTIVELY PURSUING THE SAME. 7. RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE VIEW TAKEN IN THE CASES CITED SUPRA, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FOR NON - PROSECUTION. BEFORE PARTING, WE ADD THAT IN CASE THE ASSESSEE IS SERIOUS IN PURSUING THE APPEAL FILED , THEN SHE WOULD BE AT LIBERTY TO PRAY FOR A RECALL OF THIS ORDER BY MOVING AN APPROPRIATE PETITION AND ALSO BY TAKING APPROPRIATE ACTION TO CORRECT THE DEFECTS, IF ANY, POINTED OUT. THE CO - ORDINATE BENCH CONSIDERING THE PETITION, IF SO SATISFIED WITH THE EXPLANATION AND THE ACTIONS OF CURING THE DEFECTS, MAY RECALL THIS ORDER. 8. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR NON - PROSECUTION. ORDER IS PRONOUN CED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 9 TH JANUARY , 201 9 . SD/ - SD/ - [ AMIT SHUKLA ] [O.P. KANT] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 9 TH JANUARY, 2019 . RK / - [D.T.D.S] COPY FORWARDED TO: 1 . APPELLANT 2 . RESPONDENT 3 . CIT 4 . CIT(A) 5 . DR ASST. REGISTRAR, ITAT, NEW DELHI