Revkreesh Fashion Private Limited, Surat V. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(1)(1), Surat

ITA 502/SRT/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 104 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2313 (ITAT-SURAT)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 8 month(s) 22 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-04-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 10-04-2022
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 19-07-2018
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ANUPAMA SINGLA
• Assessee Lawyers: RASESH SHAH
• Keywords: Opportunity of being heard; Principle of natural justice; Set aside
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM & DR. A. L. SAINI, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.502/SRT/2018 (Ǔनधा[रणवष[ / Assessment Years: (2011-12) (Virtual Court Hearing) Revkreesh Fashion Pvt. Ltd., 57, Bhurigam, Antroli, Palsana, Kadodara, Surat-394315. Vs. The DCIT, Circle-2(1)(1), Surat. èथायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AADCR8450K (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Rasesh Shah, CA Revenue by: Ms Anupama Singla, Sr. DR स ु नवाईकȧतारȣख/ Date of Hearing : 11/04/2022 घोषणाकȧतारȣख/Date of Pronouncement : 11/04/2022 आदेश / O R D E R PER DR. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year 2011-12, is directed against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2 [in short ‘ld. CIT(A)’], Surat in Appeal No. CAS/2/372/2016-17, dated 24.05.2018, which in turn arises out of an assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) dated 10.11.2016. 2. At the outset itself, the ld. Counsel for the assessee assailed the impugned order by contending that assessee could not represent his case before Ld. CIT(A) and the order being an ex parte order, stood vitiated on account of violation of principle of natural justice. Learned Counsel submits that notices of hearing were not reached to assessee during appellate proceedings, hence assessee could not appear before Ld. CIT(A). Therefore, Ld. Counsel prays that another opportunity to represent the case before first appellate authority may be granted to the assessee. Page | 2 ITA No.502/SRT/2018 Assessment Year. 2011-12 Revkressh Fashion Pvt. Ltd. 3. Considering the above facts, we note that assessee has not given sufficient opportunity of being heard and could not plead his case successfully before the ld. CIT(A). We also note that Ld. CIT(A) did not adjudicate the various issues on merits. We note that it is settled law that principles of natural justice and fair play require that the affected party is granted sufficient opportunity of being heard to contest his case. Therefore, without delving much deeper into the merits of the case, in the interest of justice, we restore the matter back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication and pass a speaking order after affording sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee, who in turn, is also directed to contest his stand forthwith. Therefore, we deem it fit and proper to set aside the order of the ld. CIT(A) and remit the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) to adjudicate the issue afresh on merits. For statistical purposes, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed. 4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order is pronounced on 11/04/2022 by placing result on notice board. Sd/- Sd/- (PAWAN SINGH) (Dr. A.L. SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER lwjr /Surat / Ǒदनांक/ Date: 11/04/2022 SAMANTA Copy of the Order forwarded to: 1. The Assessee 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR/AR, ITAT, Surat 6. Guard File By Order // TRUE COPY // Assistant Registrar/Sr. PS/PS ITAT, Surat