IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. S. SYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI A. D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 5018/DEL/2013 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2005-06) ITA NO. 5019/DEL/2013 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2006-07) ITA NO. 5020/DEL/2013 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2007-08) ITA NO. 5021/DEL/2013 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2008-09) ITA NO. 5022/DEL/2013 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2009-10) ITA NO. 5023/DEL/2013 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2010-11) & ITA NO. 5024/DEL/2013 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2011-12) SHRI SANJAY BANATI, A-35, BRIJ GREEN FARM, VILLAGE SATBARI, MEHRAULI, NEW DELHI-110074 VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-17, NEW DELHI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN NO. AFBPB4857L ASSESSEE BY: NONE REVENUE BY: SHRI S. N. BHATIA DATE OF HEARING 24.2.2014 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 24.2.2014 ORDER PER BENCH: THESE APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDERS DATED 21.6.2013 PASSED BY THE LD. CIT(A) IN RELATIO N TO THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2005-06 TO 2011-12. DESPITE SENDIN G NOTICE OF ITA NO. 5018 TO 5024/DEL/2013 SHRI SANJAY BANATI 2 HEARING SUFFICIENTLY IN ADVANCE, NEITHER ASSESSEE A TTENDED NOR ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED. IT I S THUS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE TH ESE APPEALS. 2. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FO LLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN CLUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD.; 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) AND HONBL E MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURTS DECISION IN ESTATE OF LATE TUK OJIRAO HOLKAR VS CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE TREAT THESE APPEALS AS UNADMITTED AND DISMISS THE SAME. 3. AS A RESULT, THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AT THE TIME OF H EARING I.E. ON 24.02.2014. SD/- SD/- (A. D. JAIN) (R. S. SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 24/02/2014 *SUBODH* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1.APPELLANT 2.RESPONDENT 3.CIT 4.CIT(APPEALS) 5.DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR