IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES, D, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R V EASWAR, PRESIDENT AND SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I T A NO: 5033/MUM/2008 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2004-05) DINESH GANGAPRASAD JAISWAL, MUMBAI APPELLANT (PAN: ABVPJ5571B) VS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 18(2)(4), MUMBAI RESPOND ENT ASSESSEE BY: NONE REVENUE BY: MR M R KUBAL O R D E R R V EASWAR, PRESIDENT: THERE WAS NO REPRESENTATION FROM THE ASSESSEE WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING TODAY. THERE IS ALSO NO APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT. THE RECORD SHOWS THAT SEVERAL OPP ORTUNITIES WERE GIVEN EARLIER. IT THUS APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE I S NOT KEEN IN PURSUING THE APPEAL. THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL ARE ALS O ARGUMENTATIVE AND DO NOT CONFORM TO RULE 8 OF THE ITAT RULES. IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSE CUTION FOLLOWING THE ORDER OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBU NAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD. (1991) 38 ITD 320 (DEL). ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING ON 20 TH JULY 2011. SD/- SD/- (RAJENDRA SINGH) (R V EASWAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PRESIDE NT MUMBAI, DATED 20 TH JULY 2011 SALDANHA ITA NO: 5033/MUM/2008 2 COPY TO: 1. DINESH GANGAPRASAD JAISWAL C/O MR H S NANDU, ADVOCATE 228-A/3, LEELA BHAVAN NEAR KOLIWADA RAILWAY STATION SION (EAST), MUMBAI 400 022 2. ITO, WARD 18(2)(4), MUMBAI 3. CIT-XVIII, MUMBAI 4. CIT(A)-XVIII, MUMBAI 5. DR D BENCH TRUE COPY BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI