Chetna Bisht, Ghaziabad V. ITO WARD -1(2), Ghaziabad

ITA 5130/DEL/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 104 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5493 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 6 month(s) 24 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 27-12-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 02-06-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: SUNIL KUMAR TYAGI

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI “SMC” BENCH: NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING ) BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.5130/Del/2019 [Assessment Year : 2009-10] Chetna Bisht, F.No.5/4, Gulmohar Road, Shipra Suncity, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad-201010. PAN-APLPB1602B vs ITO, Ward-1(2), Ghaziabad. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Sh. Sunil Kumar Tyagi, CA Respondent by Sh. Om Prakash, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 28.12.2021 Date of Pronouncement 28.12.2021 ORDER PER KUL BHARAT, JM : This appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2009-10 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A), Aligarh dated 10.07.2018. 2. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, vide its letter dated 30.10.2021, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed. 3. Learned Sr. DR has no objection. 4. In view of the above, I accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 28 th December, 2021. Sd/- (KUL BHARAT) JUDICIAL MEMBER *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI