SHRI VINOD KUMAR DHANJA, AJMER V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AJMER

ITA 514/JPR/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 124 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9716 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-09-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 16-04-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: J C KULHARI

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH FOT; IKY JKO] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA. NO. 514/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2013-14 SHRI VINOD KUMAR DHANJA PLOT NO. 25, JAGDAMBA COLONY, FOY SAGAR ROAD, AJMER (RAJ.) - 305001. CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD-1(3), AJMER. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: ANUPD 2219 F VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI J. C. KULHARI (JCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 19/09/2018 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 25/09/2018 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST TH E ORDER OF LD. CIT(A), AJMER DATED 15.01.2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT Y EAR 2013-14. 2. NONE HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION WAS FILED. IT IS THUS APPA RENT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING PROSECUTION OF THE PR ESENT APPEAL. SO IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., [1991] 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO ON ITA NO. 514/JP/2018 SHRI VINOD KUMAR DHANJA VS. ITO 2 THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT [1997] 223 ITR 480, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 3. BEFORE PARTING, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO STATE THAT IN CASE THE ASSESSEE IS SERIOUS IN PURSUING ITS APPEAL FILED, THEN IT WO ULD BE AT LIBERTY IF SO ADVISED TO PRAY FOR A RECALL OF THIS ORDER BY MOVIN G AN APPROPRIATE APPLICATION AND BY GIVING AN UNDERTAKING THAT IT SH ALL NOT ABUSE THE TIME OF THE TRIBUNAL. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 25/09/2018. SD/- SD/- FOT; IKY JKO FOE FLAG ;KNO (VIJAY PAL RAO) (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:-25/09/2018. *SANTOSH VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI VINOD KUMAR DHANJA, AJMER. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD- 1(3), AJMER. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE { ITA NO. 514/JP/2018} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR