IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR. BEFORE SH. A.D.JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. B.P. JAIN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 517 (ASR)/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2005-06 P AN: AFZPB1564Q SH. RAHUL BHAT 12-B,DREAMLANDS COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. SECTOR-1, EXT., TRIKUTA NAGAR, JAMMU-180004 VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD NO. 1(2), JAMMU. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY: SH. TARSEM LAL, DR DATE OF HEARING: 16.03.2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 17.03.2015 ORDER PER A.D. JAIN, J.M. 1. EARLIER, THE CASES WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 16.03 .2015. DESPITE THE ISSUANCE OF NOTICE FOR TODAY, 16.03.201 5 THE ASSESSEE FOR HEARING, NEITHER ANYBODY TURNED UP NOR ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION WAS FILED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THEREFORE, CONSIDE RING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE INCOME-TAX (APPELLATE TRIBUNAL) RULES, 1963, AS WERE CONSIDERE D IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 (DEL.), WE TREAT I.T.A. NO. 517 (ASR)/2014 ASSE SSMENT YEAR: 2005-06 2 THIS APPEAL AS UN-ADMITTED. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, S HALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS OR DER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE, ETC. AND IF THE BEN CH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS, ETC., THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALL ED. 2. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COU RT ON 17 TH MARCH, 2015. SD/- SD/- (B.P. JAIN) (A.D . JAIN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 17 TH MARCH, 2015 /PK/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE ASSESSEE: SH. RAHUL BHAT 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2), JAMMU. 3. THE CIT(A), 4. THE CIT, 5. THE SR DR, I.T.A.T., TRUE COPY BY ORDER (ASSISTANT REGISTRAR) INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AMRITSAR BENCH: AMRITSAR.