Nitin Kumar Garg Prop M/S Ram Lal Ashok Kumar, V. CIT,

ITA 518/CHANDI/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 90188 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 19 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 04-06-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 04-06-2015
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 15-05-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: JYOTI KUMARI
• Section: 263

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH A CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI T.R.SOOD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 518/CHD/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-10 SHRI NITIN KUMAR GARG, VS THE CIT, PROP. M/S RAM LAL ASHOK KUMAR, PATIALA. BKO, LEHAL KHURD, LEHRAGAGA. PAN: AESPG3260J (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SMT. JYOTI KUMARI DATE OF HEARING : 04.06.2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 04.06.2015 O R D E R PER BHAVNESH SAINI,JM THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORD ER OF LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA DATED 20.03.201 4 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 CHALLENGING THE ORDER UNDER SECTION 263 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT. 2. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SHRI DEEPAK ANA ND, ADVOCATE FORWARDED A REQUEST IN WRITING FOR WITHDRA WAL OF THE APPEAL BECAUSE THE ASSESSING OFFICER IN PURSUANCE O F THE ORDER UNDER SECTION 263 OF THE ACT ACCEPTED THE CONTENTIO N OF THE ASSESSEE AND NO ADDITION WAS MADE WHILE FRAMING THE 2 ASSESSMENT. HE HAS, THEREFORE, PRAYED THAT APPEAL M AY BE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 4 TH JUNE, 2015. SD/- SD/- (T.R.SOOD) (BHAVNESH SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 4 TH JUNE, 2015. POONAM COPY TO: THE APPELLANT, THE RESPONDENT, THE CIT(A), THE CIT, DR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT CHANDIGARH