IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : A N EW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGARWAL , HONBLE VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI H.S. SIDHU , JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO S . 5189 & 5190 / DEL / 201 1 ASSESSMENT YEAR S 2005 - 06 & 200 6 - 0 7 BRIGHT CAREER DISTRIBUTORS VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER 2590, KUTCHA CHELAN, DARYA GANJ WARD 30(2), NEW DELHI. NEW DELHI (PAN AA EFB 6332 J ) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : S HRI Y. KAKKAR , S R. D.R . O RDER PER H.S. SIDHU , J . M : 1. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THESE APPEAL S AGAINST THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 30 .0 8 .201 1 PASSED BY THE LD. CIT(A) - XXV , NEW DELHI. 2. THE NOTICE FOR HEARING FOR 2 4 .07.2014 WAS ISSUED TO THE ASSESSEE BY REGISTERED POST ON THE ADDRESS G IVEN BY THE ASSESSEE IN FORM NO. 36, COLUMN NO.10, B UT IN RESPONSE TO THE SAME, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE NOR HIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE APPEARED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL TO PROSECUTE THE MATTER IN DISPUTE OR FILE ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT. 3. KEEPING IN V IEW OF THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PRESENT CASE AND THE PROVISIONS OF ORDER V RULE 19A OF THE INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 ITA NO S . 5189 & 5190/DEL/ 2011 2 (DEL) ; AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE DISMISS TH ESE APPEAL S FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NON PROSECUTION. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AS PER LAW. 4 . IN THE RESULT, THE ASSESSEES APPEAL S IS DISMISSED . THE ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 01 .0 8 .2014 SD/ - SD/ - ( G.D. AGARWAL ) ( H.S. SIDHU ) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER D ATED 01 .0 8 .2014 A KS* COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT (APPEALS) CONCERNED 4. CIT CONCERNED 5. D.R., ITAT, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR