1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH B, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI P.K. BANSAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.52/LKW/2016 CIT(EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW VS SHIV RAJ SHARMA SHIKSHA SAMITI, BILAS PUR, TEHSIL SADAR, GREATER NOIDA, GAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR. (U.P.) PAN AAEAS 1186 J (RESPONDENT) (APPELLANT) SHRI KANCHAN KAUSHAL, CA APPELLANT BY SHRI VIVEK MISHRA, CIT,DR RESPONDENT BY 22 /0 4 /2016 DATE OF HEARING 09 / 06 /201 6 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT O R D E R PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JM. THIS IS AN ASSESSEES APPEAL DIRECTED AGAINST THE O RDER OF LD. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW DATED 20.01.2016 PASSED BY HI M U/S 12AA(1)(B)(II) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961. 2. THE ASSESSEE HAS RAISED VARIOUS GROUNDS BUT THE ONLY GRIEVANCE OF THE ASSESSEE IS REGARDING REJECTION OF THE ASSESSEE APP LICATION FOR REGISTRATION U/S 12AA OF THE ACT. IT WAS NOTED IN THE IMPUGNED O RDER THAT THE ASSESSEE TRUST HAS FAILED TO PRODUCE/FURNISH ITS BOOKS OF AC COUNTS, BANK STATEMENT AND VOUCHERS TO SUBSTANTIATE ITS ELIGIBILITY FOR GR ANT OF REGISTRATION U/S 12AA. THEREFORE, CIT(EXEMPTION) WAS REJECTED HIS APPLICAT ION 3. THE BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE ARE THAT THE ASSESSE E TRUST HAS FILED AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 12A(A) OF THE ACT ON 09/0 7/2015 IN THE OFFICE OF 2 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW SEE KING GRANT OF REGISTRATION U/S 12AA OF THE ACT. 4. LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT REASONABL E OPPORTUNITY OF HEARING WAS NOT PROVIDED BY LD. CIT (EXEMPTIONS) AN D THEREFORE, THE MATTER MAY BE RESTORED BACK TO HIS FILE FOR A FRESH DECISI ON AFTER ALLOWING REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD TO THE ASSESS EE. 5. LD. CIT(EXEMPTIONS) HAS MENTIONED IN HIS ORDER T HAT HE HAS PERUSED THE DETAILS AVAILABLE ON RECORDS. THE ASSES SEE TRUST HAS NEITHER FILED ANY DETAILS NOR PRODUCED BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS, B ANK STATEMENT AND VOUCHERS FOR VERIFICATION OF ACTIVITIES OF THE TRUS T. CIT(EXEMPTIONS) HAS MENTIONED THAT ASSESSEE SOCIETY IS NOT CARRYING OUT ANY CHARITABLE ACTIVITIES. DUE TO NON COMPLIANCE OF ASSESSEE, THE GENUINENESS OF ACTIVITIES COULD NOT BE VERIFIED. AS PER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 12AA(1) OF THE ACT, TWO FACTORS NAMELY THE OBJECTS OF CHARITAB LE PURPOSE AND THE GENUINENESS OF ACTIVITIES HAVE TO BE PROVED BEFORE GRANTING THE REGISTRATION. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE FAILED TO PROVE THE SAME AS THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 12AA(1)(B) WAS REJECTED. 6. WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF PRESENT CASE, THE ASSESSEE HAS STA TED THAT HE HAS NOT BEEN PROPERLY HEARD, THEREFORE, WE THINK IT PROPER THAT THE MATTER SHOULD GO BACK TO CIT (EXEMPTIONS) FOR FRESH DECISION AFTER ALLOWI NG THE ADEQUATE OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD TO THE ASSESSEE. ACCORDI NGLY, WE SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF LD. CIT (EXEMPTIONS) AND RESTORE THE MATTE R BACK TO HIS FILE FOR A FRESH DECISION AFTER ALLOWING ADEQUATE OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD TO THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE IS ALSO DIRECTED TO FILE BOO KS OF ACCOUNTS/VOUCHERS AND NECESSARY DOCUMENTS ETC. BEFORE THE CIT(A) WHO WILL CONSIDER THESE DOCUMENTS BEFORE DECIDING THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSE E. 3 7. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. (ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE DAT E MENTIONED ON THE CAPTION PAGE) SD/- SD/- (P.K. BANSAL) (MAHAVIR PRASAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 09/06/2016 AKS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1.THE APPELLANT 2.THE RESPONDENT. 3.CONCERNED CIT 4.THE CIT(A) 5.D.R., I.T.A.T., LUCKNOW ASSTT. REG ISTRAR