SHABBIR MAINUDDIN BHARMAL, MUMBAI V. ITO WD 1(4), THANE

ITA 5228/MUM/2010

• Counselvise Citation: 522819914 RSA 2010
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 1 month(s) 28 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 23-08-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: H
• Assessment Year: 2002-2003
• Appeal Filed On: 25-06-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: GOLI SRINIWAS RAO

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, H BENCH, MUMBAI. BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI R.S.PADVEKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A NOS.5228 TO 5231/ MUM/2010 ASSESSMENT YEARS: 2002-03 TO 2005-06 SHABBIR MAINUDDIN BHARMAL, .. APPELLANT H.NO.18, IQBAL MANZIL, 5 TH NIZAMPURA, BHIWANDI(D-THANE). PA NO.AJUPB 7543 E VS INCOME TAX OFFICER 1(4) .. RESPONDEN T 2 ND FLOOR, M. RANI MANDION, MURBAD ROAD, KALYAN. APPEARANCES: NONE, FOR THE APPELLANT GOLI SRINIWAS RAO , FOR THE RESPONDENT DATE OF HEARING : 23.8.2011 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 23 -08-2011 O R D E R PER BENCH: 1. THESE FOUR APPEALS ARE DIRECTED AGAINST SEPARATE ORD ERS DATED 29.3.2010 OF THE CIT(A)-1, THANE, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2002-03 TO 2005-06, RESPECTIVELY. 2. NOTICE POSTING THE APPEALS FOR HEARING ON 23 RD AUGUST, 2011 AND SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY RPAD TO THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN FORM NO.36, HAS NOT EVOKED ANY RESPONSE FROM THE ASSESSEE. IT IS, THEREFORE, INFERRED THAT TH E ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN I.T.A NOS.5228 TO 5231/ MUM/2010 ASSESSMENT YEARS: 2002-03 TO 2005-06 2 PURSUING THE APPEALS WHICH ARE HEREBY DISMISSED FOR NON- PROSECUTION FOLLOWING THE ORDER OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD. (1991) 38 ITD 320 (DEL) AND ALSO THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CHEMIPOL V UOI, DATED 17 TH SEPTEMBER, 2009 (BHC) 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEALS ARE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSE CUTION. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 23 RD AUGUST, 2011 SD/- (R.S.PADVEKAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER SD/- (PRAMOD KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED 23 RD AUGUST, 2011 PARIDA COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-1, THANE 4. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, II, THANE 5. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, BENCH H MUMBAI //TRUE COPY// BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI