DCIT, New Delhi V. Sh. Raghbir Singh, New Delhi

ITA 523/DEL/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7545 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 4 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 30-05-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Next Hearing Date: 24-05-2016
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 30-01-2014
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SUSAN D GEORGE
• Assessee Lawyers: RICHA SHARMA
• Keywords: Competent authority; Tax effect

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGR A WAL , VICE PRESIDENT , AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 523 /DEL /20 1 4 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009 - 10 THE D.C. I.T . VS. S HRI RAGHBIR SINGH CIRCLE - 7 ( 1 ) C/O M/S SARTAJ HOTEL APARTMENTS NEW DELHI & VILLAS PVT. LTD. CELEBRATION GARDEN, N.H. 8 RANGPURI , NEW DELHI PAN : A BAPS 9687 A [APPELLANT] [RESPONDENT] DATE OF HEARING : 24 . 0 5 . 201 6 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 30 . 0 5 .2016 APPELLANT BY : MS. SUSAN D. GEORGE , SR. DR RESPONDENT BY : MS. RICHA SHARMA , ADV ORDER PER CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) - X , DELHI DATED 22 / 11 /20 1 3 FOR A.Y 2009 - 10 2. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FIXED FOR HEARING IN VIEW OF THE RECENT CBDT INSTRUCTION NO. 21/2015 DATED 10.12.2015, REVISING THE MONETARY LIMIT OF RS.10.00 LAKHS FOR NOT FILING THE APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IN TERMS OF SECTION 268A(1) OF THE INCOME - TAX ACT. 2 ITA NO. 523 /DEL/20 1 4 2 3. THE CBDT IN ITS RECENT CIRCULAR NO. 21/2015 DATED 10.12. 2015 HAS PROVIDED THAT NO DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL SHALL BE FILED BEFORE THE 1TAT WHEREIN THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS. FURTHER, IN PARA 10 OF THE CIRCULAR, IT IS PROVIDED THAT THIS INSTRUCTION WOULD APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY AND THE PENDING APP EALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED TAX LIMIT OF RS.10 LAKHS MAY BE WITHDRAWN/NOT PRESSED. 4. THE LEARNED CIT - DR APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE REVENUE BEFORE US, AT THE OUTSET, SUBMITTED THAT APPEAL CAN BE WITHDRAWN ONLY AFTER GETTING THE APPROVAL OF COMPETENT AUTHORITY . HE FURTHER REFERRED TO PARA 7 OF THE CIRCULAR TO SUBMIT THAT DISMISSAL OF APPEAL, HOWEVER, IN ANY CASE, ON ACCOUNT OF LOW TAX EFFECT SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A PRECEDENCE IN THE MATTERS OF SUBSEQUENT YEARS WHERE THE TAX EFFECT IS ABOVE THE MONETARY LI MIT PRESCRIBED BY THIS CIRCULAR AND THE ISSUE SHOULD BE DECIDED ON MERITS. 5. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, ON THE OTHER HAND, STATED THAT THE CIRCULAR IS SQUARELY APPLICABLE TO THE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE REVENUE. 6. AFTER CONSIDERING THE SUBMISSIO NS OF BOTH THE PARTIES, WE FIND THAT PRIMA FACIE, THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL BY THE REVENUE IS BELOW RS. 10.00 LAKHS AND, THEREFORE, WE DEEM IT PROPER TO DISMISS THE APPEAL PARTICULARLY BECAUSE THE PENDING APPEAL IS COVERED 3 ITA NO. 523 /DEL/20 1 4 3 BY CIRCULAR IN VIEW OF PARA 10 OF THE CIRCULAR. HOWEVER, WE MAY CLARIFY THAT IF ON RECEIPT OF THIS ORDER, THE ASSESSING OFFICER FINDS THAT THE TAX EFFECT IS ABOVE RS.10 LAKHS OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER, THE CIRCULAR IS NOT APPLICABLE IN VIEW OF EXCEPTIONS CULLED OUT IN THE CIRCUL AR, HE WILL BE AT LIBERTY TO FILE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER WHICH THE TRIBUNAL WILL CONSIDER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. WE FURTHER FIND CONSIDERABLE FORCE IN THE CONTENTION OF THE CIT/DR THAT THIS ORDER CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS AN A CCEPTANCE BY THE REVENUE ON THE ISSUE INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL AND WILL NOT BE AN ESTOPPEL FOR THE REVENUE TO TAKE UP THE ISSUE, INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL, BEFORE ITAT ON MERITS IF THE TAX EFFECT IN THOSE YEARS IS MORE THAN RS.10 LAKHS. 7. KEEPING IN VIEW THE ABOVE CIRCULAR AND THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 268A OF THE INCOME - TAX ACT, 1961 AND WITHOUT GOING INTO MERITS OF THE CASE, WE DISMISS THE INSTANT APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AS TAX EFFECT IN THE APPEAL IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS. 8. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE STANDS DISMISSED. THE ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 3 0 .0 5 .2016. SD/ - SD/ - ( G.D. AGARWAL ) (C.M. GARG) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 3 0 T H MAY , 2016. VL/ 4 ITA NO. 523 /DEL/20 1 4 4 COPY FORWARDED TO: 1 . APPELLANT 2 . RESPONDENT 3 . CIT 4 . CIT(A) 5 . DR ASST. REGISTRAR, ITAT, NEW DELHI