ACIT, New Delhi V. M/s. Russian Technology Centre (P) Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 5252/DEL/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 127 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4356 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-09-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Next Hearing Date: 15-05-2017
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 19-09-2013
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: PARAMITA TRIPATHY
• Assessee Lawyers: SAMEEP GUPTA

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F , NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. N. K. SAINI, AM AND SH. KULDIP SINGH , JM ITA NO. 5252/DEL/2013 : ASSTT. YEAR : 2006 - 0 7 ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR CLE - 13 , NEW DELHI VS M/S RUSSIAN TECHNOLOGY CENTRE (P) LTD., A - 1/20, SAFDARJUNG ENCLAVE, NEW DELHI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN NO. A A CCR7102D ASSESSEE BY : SH. SAMEEP GUPTA , ADV. REVENUE BY : SMT . PARAMITA TRIPATHY, CIT DR DATE OF HEARING : 21 .09 .201 7 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 21 . 0 9 .201 7 ORDER PER N. K. SAINI, AM: THIS IS AN APPEAL BY THE DEPARTMENT AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.09.2011 OF LD. CIT(A) - I , NEW DELHI . 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LD. CIT D R SUBMITTED THAT THE APPEAL OF THE DEPARTMENT MAY BE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN IN VIEW OF THE LETTER DATED 20.09.2017 OF THE ITO (JUDICIAL), DELHI. SH E FURNISHED THE COPY OF THE SAID LETTER WHICH IS PLACED ON RECORD. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITT ED THAT THE APPEAL OF THE DEPARTMENT IS IN FRUCTUOUS SINCE THE GROUNDS RAISED IN THIS APPEAL ARE NOT ARISING OUT OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A). 4. WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE SUBMISSIONS OF BOTH THE PARTIES AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL AVAILABLE ON THE R ECORD. IN THE PRESENT CASE, THE ITO(JUDICIAL), DELHI VIDE LETTER DATED 20.09.2017 SUBMITTED AS UNDER: ITA NO. 5252 /DEL /201 3 RUSSIAN TECHNOLOGY CENTRE P. LTD. 2 PLEASE REFER TO YOUR OFFICE LETTER F.NO.CIT(DR) - 6/F - BENCH/ITAT/2017 - 18/309 DATED 01.08.2017. IN THIS REGARD, I AM DIRECTED TO INFORM YOU THAT ON PERUS AL OF THE CIT(A) - I ORDER APPEAL NO. 87/11 - 12 DATED 30.09.2011 IN THE CASE OF M/S RUSSIAN TECHNOLOGY CENTRE (P) LTD. FOR THE A.Y. 2006 - 07, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE LD. CIT(A) HAS DISMISSED THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE. THEREFORE, THE APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE PRESSED AND MAY BE WITHDRAWN. YOURS FAITHFULLY SD/ - (SACHIN KUMAR) ITO ( JUDICIAL) DELHI - 7 5. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE APPEAL OF THE DEPARTMENT IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6 . IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE DEPARTMENT IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN . (ORD ER PRON OUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 21 /0 9 /2017) SD/ - SD/ - ( KULDIP SINGH ) (N. K. SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DAT ED: 21 /09 /2017 *SUBODH* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1 . A PPELLANT 2 . RESPONDENT 3 . CIT 4 . CIT(APPEALS) 5 . DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR