M/s. Mahila Jagriti and Vikas Kendra, Rohtak V. ACIT, Rewari

ITA 5271/DEL/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 127 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3338 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 2 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-11-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 24-08-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES: F , NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R . S . SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SMT. BEENA A PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 5271 /DEL/201 5 A.Y. 201 0 - 11 MAHILA JAGRITI AND VIKAS KENDRA 1039/23 DLF COLONY ROHTAK 124 001 PAN: AABTM 5551 B VS . ACIT, REWARI CIRCLE REWARI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SHRI ATIQ AHMAD, SR.D.R DATE OF HEARING 1 6 TH NOVEMBER, 2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 21 ST NOVEMBER, 2017 ORDER PER BEENA A PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A), NEW DELHI DATED 30.04.2015 FOR THE A.Y. 20 10 - 11 . NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE , AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL DESPITE ISSUE OF NOTICE DATED 19.7.17 FIXING THE DATE OF HEARING 24.8.2017 AND NOTICE DATED 25.9.2017 FIXING THE DATE OF HEARING 16.11.2017 THROUGH REGISTERED POST . I T APPEARS THAT ASSESSEE IS NO MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, THE APPEAL O F ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS UN - ADMITTED. 2 . IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FOLLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., 38 I TD 320 (DEL.); ITA 5271/DEL/2015 A.Y. 2010 - 11 MAHI LA JAGRITI AND VIKAS KENDRA, ROHTAK 2 HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND ALSO THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477 - 478 ) WHEREIN THEIR LORDSHIPS HELD THAT THE APPEAL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILING OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFFECTIVELY PURSUING THE SAME, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS UN - ADMITTED. 3. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 21 ST NOVEMBER, 2017. SD/ - SD/ - (R.S. SYAL) (BEENA A PILLAI) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 21 ST NOVEMBER, 2017. *MV COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASST. REGISTRAR ITAT, DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI