IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , J BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE : SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI M.BALAGANESH, A CCOUNTANT M EMBER ITA NO. 5282 /MUM/ 20 17 ( ASSESSMENT YEAR : 201 2 - 1 3 ) M/S. OMYA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 302, 3 RD FLO OR, WINDSOR HOUSE OFF. CST ROAD, KALINA SANTACRUZ(W) MUMBAI 400 098 VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 7(3)(1) AAYKAR BHAVAN MARINE LINES MUMBAI 400 020 PAN/GIR NO. AAACO7164N (APPELLANT ) .. (RESPONDENT ) ASSESSEE BY SHRI KETAN VED REVENUE BY SHRI VATSALYA SAXENA DATE OF HEARING 12 / 07 /202 1 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 12 / 07 /202 1 / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M) : THIS APPEAL IN ITA NO. 5282/MUM/2017 FOR A.Y. 2012 - 13 PREFERRED BY THE ORDER AGAINST THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER DATED 29/11/2016 U/S.143(3) R.W.S.144C(13) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS ACT, PURSUANT TO THE DIRECTIONS OF THE LD. DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL (DRP IN SHORT) U/S.144C(5) OF THE ACT DATED 29/09/2016 FOR TH E A.Y.2012 - 13. ITA NO . 5282/MUM/2017 M/S. OMYA INDIA PVT. LTD., 2 2. WE FIND THAT THE LD. AR FILED A LETTER DATED 12/07/2021 MENTIONING THAT ASSESSEE HAD PREFERRED AN APPLICATION UNDER DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISWAS SCHEME 2020 TO SETTLE THIS TAX DISPUTE FOR THE YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION AND HAD OBTAINED FOR M - 5 FROM THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY THEREON, COPY OF WHICH WAS ENCLOSED ALONGWITH THIS LETTER. LD. DR ALSO AGREED THAT THE FORM - 5 HAS BEEN RECEIVED. 3. IN VIEW OF T HIS, WE HEREBY DISMISS THE APPEAL PENDING BEFORE US . 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSE E IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 12 / 07 /202 1 . SD/ - ( VIKAS AWASTHY ) SD/ - (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI ; DATED 12 / 07 / 2021 KARUNA , SR.PS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER, ( ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, MUMBAI 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(A), MUMBAI. 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. //TRUE COPY//