Bapusaheb Dattatray Waghere, Pune V. Income-tax Officer, Ward - 8(4), Pune

ITA 529/PUN/2018

AI Insights

This case involved an appeal by Shri Bapusaheb D. Waghmare against an order from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 13, Pune, concerning the Assessment Year 2013-14. The appeal was heard by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Pune. The primary issue in the appeal was resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, a scheme aimed at resolving pending tax disputes. The assessee submitted a letter seeking to withdraw the appeal, which was supported by the submission of Forms No.3 and 5 issued by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Pune. The tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeal, leading to the dismissal of the case.

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 124344 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 18 year(s) 7 month(s) 30 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 24-11-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 24-11-2022
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 25-03-2004
• Laws Referred To: Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTNT MEMBER AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 529/PUN/2018 : A.Y. 2013-14 Shri Bapusaheb D. Waghmare Building No. T/B4/5-504 Ajmera colony, Pimpri, Pune-411 018 PAN: AAJPW 1235 E Appellant Vs. The I.T.O. Ward 8(4) Pune. Respondent Appellant by : None Responent by : Shri Ramnth P. Murkunde Date of Hearing : 25-11-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 25-11-2022 ORDER PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM : This appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 13, Pune dated 22-01-2018 for the Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. Before us, the ld. Counsel for the assessee filed a letter dt. 24-08-2021 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the issue involved in this appeal stands settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The assessee also filed copy of Forms No.3 and 5 issued by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 Pune. 3. The ld. DR has no objection in case the assessee wishes to withdraw the appeal. 4. In view of the request made by the assessee, we permit the assessee to withdraw the appeal. 2 ITA No. 529/PUN/2018 Bapusaheb D. Waghmare A.Y. 2013-14 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on this 25 th day of November 2022 sd/- sd/- (INTURI RAMA RAO) (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Pune; Dated : 25 th November 2022 Ankam t 3 ITA No. 529/PUN/2018 Bapusaheb D. Waghmare A.Y. 2013-14 Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant. 2. The Respondent. 3. The Pr. CIT-3 Pune 4. The CIT(A)-13 Pune 5. The D.R. (ITAT) Pune. 5. Guard File BY ORDER, Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Pune. /// TRUE COPY /// 4 ITA No. 529/PUN/2018 Bapusaheb D. Waghmare A.Y. 2013-14 Date 1 Draft dictated on 25-11-2022 Sr.PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 25-11-2022 Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft proposed and placed before the second Member JM/AM 4 Draft discussed/approved by second Member AM/JM 5 Approved draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS Sr.PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of order Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R 11 Date of dispatch of order