INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.:-5336/DEL/2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12 O R D E R PER L.P. SAHU, A.M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(APPEALS)-16, NEW DELHI VIDE ORDER DATED 29.07.2016 PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12. 2. IN THIS CASE NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE FOR HEARING BY REGD. AD POST FOR 07.05.2019 AT THE ADDRESS MENTIONED IN FORM NO. 36 VIDE COLMUN NO. 10. SMT. PARAMJEET KUMARI LUTHARA PROP. M/S. INTERNATIONAL SURGICO INDUSTRIES, 3071/8, PARTAP STREET, DARYAGANJ NEW DELHI - 110 002. VS. J CIT, RANGE-30, NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY: NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SMT. RINKO SINGH, ADDL.CIT DATE OF HEARING 07/05 /201 9 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 07/05 /201 9 2 3. ON 07.5.2019, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE NOR ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDED THE HEARING AND ALSO NOT FILED ANY ADJOURNMENT . IT IS THUS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF APPEAL. 4. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN VIEW THE PROVISIONS OF ORDER V RULE 19A OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED. 5. IN THE RESULT APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. THIS DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 07 TH MAY, 2019. SD/- SD/- (AMIT SHUKLA) (L.P. SAHU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 07/05/2019 VEENA COPY FORWARDED TO 1. APPLICANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI