IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH A, KOLKATA [BEFORE SHRI VEERAVALLI DURGA RAO, JM AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, AM] I.T.A. NO. 536/KOL/2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12 SUMAN SARKAR.........................................................APPELLANT 102/22, NATUN PARA, KONNAGAR, UTTARPARA, HOOGHLY 712 235 ITO WARD 48 (3)...........................................RESPONDENT 10, MIDDLETON ROW, KOLKATA 700 015 [PAN : BWCPS 7624 F] APPEARANCES BY: NONE APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. SHRI SALLONG YADEN, ADDL. CIT APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE REVENUE. DATE OF CONCLUDING THE HEARING : DECEMBER 07, 2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCING THE ORDER : DECEMBER 07, 2017 ORDER PER VEERAVALLI DURGA RAO, JM THIS APPEAL IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(APPEALS)-14, KOLKATA DATED 18.01.2016 FOR A.Y. 2011-12. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 23.10.2017. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. AGAIN THIS APPEAL IS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 07.12.2017. WHEN THIS APPEAL IS CALLED FOR HEARING, WE FIND NO REPRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR FILE ANY APPLICATION SEEKING ADJOURNMENT. 3. IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING HIS CASE. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, FOLLOWING THE DECISIONS OF THE ITAT, DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LIMITED REPORTED IN 38 ITD 2 I.T.A. NO. 536/KOL/2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12 SUMAN SARKAR 320 (DEL) AND HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT REPORTED IN (223 ITR 480 (MP), WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 7 TH DECEMBER, 2017. SD/- SD/- (M. BALAGANESH) (VEERAVALLI DURGA RAO) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 07/12/2017 BISWAJIT, SR. PS COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. SUMAN SARKAR, 102/22, NATUN PARA, KONNAGAR, UTTARPARA, HOOGHLY 712235. 2. ITO WARD 48(3), 10, MIDDLETON ROW, KOLKATA 15. 3. THE CIT(A) 4. THE CIT 5. DR TRUE COPY, BY ORDER, SR. P.S. / H.O.O. ITAT, KOLKATA