आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरणआयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद यायपीठ अहमदाबाद यायपीठअहमदाबाद यायपीठ अहमदाबाद यायपीठ ‘A’ अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद।अहमदाबाद। अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. SUCHITRA RAGHUNATH KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.539/Ahd/2024 Assessment Year : - Shri Saptamukhi Charitable Trust Mukam Post Limbadia Jam, Gadhada vis Dhasa Jn. Bhavnagar 364 230 PAN : AABTS 5941 B Vs. CIT (Exemption) Ahmedabad. (Applicant) (Responent) Assessee by : Shri Mohit Balani, AR Revenue by : Shri H. Phani Raju, CIT-DR सुनवाई क तारीख/D a t e o f He a r in g : 09 / 0 7 / 2 0 2 4 घोषणा क तारीख /D a t e o f P r o no u nc e me nt : 0 9 / 0 7 / 2 0 2 4 आदेश आदेशआदेश आदेश/O R D E R PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Present appeal has been filed by the assessee-trust against order passed by the ld.Commissioner of Income (Exemption), Ahmedabad dated 20.1.2024 under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for short]. 2. Grounds raised are as under: 1) Ld.CIT(E) has erred in law and on facts of the case in passing the impugned order ex parte. 2) Ld.CIT(E) has erred in law and on the facts of the case in rejection of the provisional registration of appellant u/s.12AB of the Act. 3) The ld.CIT(E) has erred in law and on the facts of the case in passing the order u/s.12AB of the Act. Under the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order was barred by limitation. ITA No.539/Ahd/2024 2 3. At the outset itself, the ld.counsel for the assessee-trust submitted that the grievance of the assessee is against the denial of registration under section 12AB of the Act. However, during the pendency of the proceedings before this Tribunal, pursuant to the application of the assessee made under section 12A(1)(ac)(i) of the Act, the ld.Pr.CIT(Exemption) granted registration of the trust vide his order dated 1.6.2024, and therefore, the grievance of the assessee- trust has been addressed and resolved by the Department. Therefore, there is no need pursue with the present appeal pending before the Tribunal, and the assessee intends to withdraw, as the grievance raised therein has become infructous. The ld.counsel for the assessee has also placed on record a copy of the order of the Pr.CIT(E) dated 1.6.2024. The ld.DR has no objection to the request of the assessee. 4. In light of the above submissions of the ld.counsel for the assessee made at Bar, and perusing the order of the ld.Pr.CIT dated 1.6.2024 (supra), we find, since the grievance of the assessee having been resolved by the assessee, and the assessee-trust got registration as prayed for, consequently the appeal pending before the Tribunal has become infructuous, and it is allowed to be withdrawn, as sought for. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the Court on 9 th July, 2024 at Ahmedabad. Sd/- Sd/- (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) JUDICIAL MEMBER (ANNAPURNA GUPTA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad,dated 09/07/2024