IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.5426/DEL/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10 RAJ KRISHNA PURI, C-25, LAWRENCE ROAD, INDL. AREA, NEW DELHI. VS. ITO, WARD- 25(2), NEW DELHI. PAN : AJAPP1520D (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SHRI ATIQ AHMAD, SR.DR DATE OF HEARING : 03-01-2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 03-01-2018 O R D E R PER R. K. PANDA, AM : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER DATED 31.07.2014 OF CIT(A)- XVIII, NEW DELHI RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE ON 24.10.2017, TH E MATTER WAS ADJOURNED TO 03.01.2018. HOWEVER, WHEN THE NAME OF THE ASSESSEE WAS CALLED TODAY, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY PETITION SEEKING ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE WAS FILED. THIS TYPE OF ATTITUDE SHOWS THAT T HE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTEREST IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL FILED BY HIM. THEREFORE, FO LLOWING THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. REPO RTED IN 38 ITD 320 AND THE 2 ITA NO.5426/DEL/2014 DECISION OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT I N THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR REPORTED IN 223 ITR 480 (MP), THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN-LIMINE. HOWEVER, IF THE A SSESSEE THROUGH PROPER APPLICATION CAN JUSTIFY SUCH NON-APPEARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING, THE TRIBUNAL MAY AT ITS DISCRETION RECALL THE ORDER. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AT THE TIME OF HEARING ITSELF I.E. ON THIS 03 RD JANUARY, 2018. SD/- SD/- (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) (R. K. P ANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 03-01-2018. SUJEET COPY OF ORDER TO: - 1) THE APPELLANT 2) THE RESPONDENT 3) THE CIT 4) THE CIT(A) 5) THE DR, I.T.A.T., NEW DELHI BY ORDER //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI