M/s.Ulliyeri Service Co-op Bank, Calicut V. The ITO, Calicut

ITA 546/COCH/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8390 (ITAT-COCHIN)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 6 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 19-07-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 20-07-2016
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 22-12-2014
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A DHANARAJ
• Keywords: Question of law; Competent authority

Judgement Text

8 APPEALS 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH KOCHI BEFORE S/ SHRI B P JAIN , AM & GEORGE GEORGE K, JM ITA NO 134 & 719 / COCH / 2013 (A SST YEAR S 2009 - 10 & 2010 - 11 ) THE KOTTACHERY SERVICE COOP BANK LTD KANHANGAD KASARAGOD 671 315 PAN NO . AAAAT3164F VS T HE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 KASARAGOD ( APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY SH MATHEW JOSEPH REVENUE BY SH A DHANARAJ, SR DR DATE OF HEARING 20 TH JU LY 2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 20 TH J U LY 2016 ITA NO 545 TO 547 / COCH / 201 4 (A SST YEAR S 20 08 - 09 , 20 09 - 1 0 & 2011 - 12 ) M/S ULLIYERI SERVICE COOP BANK ULLIYERI PO KOZHIKODE 673 620 PAN NO . AAAAU1103H VS T HE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 (1) K OZHIKODE ( APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY S C B M WARRIER REVENUE BY SH A DHANARAJ, SR DR DATE OF HEARING 20 TH JU LY 2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 20 TH J U LY 2016 ITA NO 275 / COCH / 201 5 (A SST YEAR S 2009 - 10 ) M/S KARIYAD SERVICE COOP BANK LTD KA RIYAD SOUTH THALASSERY KANNUR 673 316 PAN NO . AA DAK0883F VS T HE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 KA NNUR ( APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) 8 APPEALS 2 ASSESSEE BY S MT VANDANA REVENUE BY SH A DHANARAJ, SR DR DATE OF HEARING 20 TH JU LY 2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 20 TH J U LY 2016 ITA NO 277 / COCH / 201 5 (A SST YEAR S 200 7 - 08 ) M/S PONNIAM SERVICE COOP BANK LTD PONNIAM THALASSERY KANNUR 670 641 PAN NO . AAA LP0078K VS T HE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 K ANNUR RANGE KANNUR ( APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY S MT VANDANA REVENUE BY SH A DHANARAJ, SR DR DATE OF HEARING 20 TH JU LY 2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 20 TH J U LY 2016 ITA NO 27 8 / COCH / 201 5 (A SST YEAR S 200 7 - 08 ) M/S PANOOR SERVICE COOP BANK LTD P ANOOR THALASSERY KANNUR 670 6 92 PAN NO . AA GF9777R VS T HE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 KANNUR ( APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY S MT VANDANA REVENUE BY SH A DHANARAJ, SR DR DATE OF HEARING 20 TH JU LY 2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 20 TH J U LY 2016 ORDER PER BENCH ; THESE ARE EIGHT APPEALS , FILED BY DIFFERENT ASSESSEES , ARISE OUT OF THE SEPARATE ORDERS OF THE CIT(A) AS PER THE DETAILS GIVEN UNDER: 8 APPEALS 3 SL.NO. ITA NO. NAME OF THE ASSESSEE CIT(A)S ORDER DATE 1 - 2 134 & 718/C/2013 THE KOTTACHERY SERVICE COOP BANK LTD 01.01.2013 & 27.08.2013 3 - 5 545 TO 547/C/2014 M/S ULLIYERI SERVICE COOP BANK 11.09.2014 6 275/C/2015 M/S KARIYAD SERVICE COOP BANK LTD 02.02.2015 7 277/C/2015 M/S PONNIAM SERVICE COOP BANK LTD 02.02.2015 8 278/C/2015 M/S PANOOR SERVICE COOP BANK LTD 02.02.2015 2 SINCE COMMON ISSUE IS INVOLVED IN ALL THESE APPEA LS; THEREFORE, FOR THE SAKE OF CONVENIENCE, THEY WERE HEARD TOGETHER AND ARE BEING DISPOSED OFF BY THIS CONSOLIDATED ORDER. 3 THE SOLITARY ISSUE THAT IS RAISED I N ALL THESE APPEALS IS WHETHER THE CIT(A) IS JUSTIFIED IN CONFIRMING THE ACTION OF THE AO IN DENYING THE DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE ACT. 4 BRIEFLY STATED THE FACTS OF THE CASE ARE AS FOLLOWS: THE ASSESSEE, IN ALL THESE APPEALS, IS A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KERALA COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969. IT IS ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF PROVIDING AGRICULTURAL CREDIT TO ITS MEMBERS. THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P (2) WAS DENIED BY THE AO FOR THE REASON THAT THE ASSESSEE IS PRIMARIL Y ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF BANKING AND IN VIEW OF SECTION 80P(4) OF THE ACT, THE ASSESSEE IS NOT ENTITLED TO DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE ACT. THE VIEW TAKEN BY THE AO WAS CONFIRMED BY THE CIT(A). 8 APPEALS 4 5 THE ASSESSEE BEING AGGRIEVED IS IN APPEAL BEFORE US. THE LD COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE ISSUE IS NOW COVERED IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE BY THE RECENT JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE CHIRAKKAL SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD & OTHERS IN ITA NO.212 OF 2013 ( JUDGMENT DATED 15 TH FEBRUARY 2016). 5 .1 THE LD DR WAS UNABLE TO CONTROVERT THE ABOVE SUBMISSIONS OF THE ASSESSEE. 6 WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD.. THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE CHIRAKK AL SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD & OTHERS (SUPRA) HAS HELD THAT THE PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KERALA COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969 IS ENTITLED TO THE BENEFIT OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2). THE HONBLE HIGH COURT WAS CONSIDERING T HE FOLLOWING SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW: A) WHETHER ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE UNDER CONSIDERATION, THE TRIBUNAL IS CORRECT IN LAW IN DECIDING AGAINST THE ASSESSEE, THE ISSUE REGARDING ENTITLEMENT FOR EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 80P, IG NORING THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY? 6 .1 IN CONSIDERING THE ABOVE QUESTION OF LAW, THE HONBLE HIGH COURT RENDERED THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: 15. APPELLANTS IN THESE DIFFERENT APPEALS ARE INDISPUTABLY SOCIETIES REGISTE RED UNDER THE 8 APPEALS 5 KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969, FOR SORT, KCS ACT AND THE BYE - LAWS OF EACH OF THEM, AS MADE AVAILABLE TO THIS COURT AS PART OF THE PAPER BOOKS, CLEARLY SHOW THAT THEY HAVE BEEN CLASSIFIED AS PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES BY T HE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THAT ACT. THE PARLIAMENT, HAVING DEFINED THE TERM 'CO - OPERATI VE SOCIETY' FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE BR ACT WI TH REFERENCE TO, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE REGISTRATION OF A SOCIETY U N DER ANY STATE LAW RELATING TO CO - O PERATIVE SOCIETIES FOR THE TIME BEING; IT CANNOT BUT BE TAKEN THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE SOCIETIES SO REGISTERED UNDER THE STATE LAW AND ITS OBJECTS HAVE TO BE UNDERSTOOD AS THOSE WHICH HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER SUCH STATE LAW. THIS , WE VISUALISE AS DUE RECIPROCATIVE LEGISLATIVE EXERCISE BY THE PARLIAMENT RECOGN I SING THE PREDOMINANCE OF DECISIONS RENDERED UNDER THE RELEVANT STATE LAW. IN TH I S VIEW OF THE MATTER, ALL THE APPELLANTS HAV I NG BEEN CLASSIFIED AS PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CRED I T SOC I ET I ES B Y THE COMPETENT AUTHOR I TY UNDE R TH E KCS ACT , I T HAS NECESSAR IL Y TO BE HELD THAT THE PRINCIPAL OBJECT OF SUCH SOCIETIES IS TO UNDERTAKE AGR I CULTURAL CREDIT ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE LOANS AND ADVANCES FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES , THE RATE ' OF IN TEREST ON SUCH LOANS AND ADVANCES TO BE AT THE RATE FIXED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES UNDER THE KCS ACT AND HAV I NG I TS AREA OF OPERATION CONFINED TO A VILLAGE, PANCHAYAT OR A MUNICIPALITY. THIS IS THE CONSEQUENCE OF THE DEFINITION CLAUSE IN SECTION 2(OAA) OF THE KCS ACT. THE AUTHORITIES UNDER THE IT ACT CANNOT PROBE INTO ANY ISSUE OR SUCH MATTER RELATING TO SUCH APPLICANTS. 16. THE POSITION OF 1 AW BEING AS ABOVE WITH REFERENCE TO THE STATUTORY PROVISIONS, THE APPELLANTS HAD SHOWN TO THE AUT HORITIES AND THE TRIBUNAL THAT THEY ARE PRIMARY AGRICULTURA L CREDIT SOCIETIES IN TERMS OF CLAUSE (CCIV) OF SECTION 5 OF THE BR ACT, HAVING REGARD TO THE PRIMARY OBJECT OR PRINCIPAL BUSINESS OF EACH OF THE APPELLANTS. IT IS ALSO CLEAR FROM THE MATERIALS ON RECORD THAT THE BYE - LAWS OF EACH OF THE APPELLANTS DO . NOT PERMIT ADMISSION OF ANY OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY AS MEMBER, EXCEPT MAY BE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISO TO SUB - CLAUSE 2 OF SECTION 5(CCIV) OF THE BR ACT. THE DIFFERENT ORDERS OF THE TRIBUNAL W HICH ARE IMPEACHED IN THESE APPEALS DO NOT CONTAIN ANY FINDING OF FACT TO THE EFFECT THAT THE BYE - 1AWS OF ANY OF THE APPELLANT OR ITS CLASS I FICATION BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE KCS ACT LS ANYTHING DIFFERENT FROM WHAT WE HAVE STATED HEREIN ABOVE. FOR THIS REASON, IT CANNOT BUT BE HELD THAT THE APPELLANTS ARE ENTITLED TO EXEMPTION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT BY VIRTUE OF SUB - SECTION 4 OF THAT SECT; ON. IN THIS VIEW OF THE MATTER, THE APPEALS SUCCEED. 8 APPEALS 6 17. IN THE LIGHT OF THE AFORESAID, WE ANSWER SUBSTANTIA 1 QUESTION 'A' IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANTS AND HOLD THAT THE TRIBUNAL ERRED IN LAW IN DECIDING THE ISSUE REGARDING THE ENTITLEMENT OF EXEMPT ION UNDER SECTION 80P AGAINST THE APPELLANTS. WE HOLD THAT THE PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL C REDIT SOCIETIES, REGISTERED AS SUCH UNDER THE KCS ACT; AND CLASSIFIED SO, UNDER THAT ACT, INCLUDING THE APPELLANTS ARE ENTITLED TO SUCH EXEMPTION. 6 .2 IN ALL THESE CASES BEFORE US, THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION OF ALL THESE ASSESSEES, UNDER THE KER ALA COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT AND THE BYE - LAWS, ARE PLACED ON RECORD. IT IS CLEAR FROM THE PERUSAL OF THE SAME THAT THE ASSESSEE IN ALL THESE APPEALS ARE PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES AND PROVIDING AGRICULTURAL CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS. THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT, IN THE ABOVE CITED JUDGMENT HAS HELD THAT SUCH SOCIETIES ARE ENTITLED TO THE BENEFIT OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE ACT. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE FINDINGS OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT (SUPRA), WE ALLOW THE APPEA LS OF ALL THESE ASSESSEE. IT IS ORDERED ACCORDINGLY. 7 IN THE RESULT, THE APPEALS FILED BY ALL THE ASSESSEES ARE ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 20 TH DAY OF JULY 2016 . SD/ - SD/ - GEORGE GEORGE K ( B P JAIN ) (JUDICIAL MEMBER ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER COCHIN: DATED 20 TH J ULY 2016 RAJ* 8 APPEALS 7 COPY TO: 1 . APPELLANT 2 . RESPONDENT 3 . CIT(A) , KOZHIKODE 4 . CIT, KANNUR/KASARAGOD 5 . DR 6 . GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTR AR ITAT, COCHI