Shri Vaidya Deen Dayal Sharma, Jaipur, Jaipur V. ITO Ward-7(3), Jaipur, Ward-7(3), Jaipur

ITA 547/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6450 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 4 month(s) 28 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 16-09-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 18-04-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: CHANCHAL MEENA CIT DHK
• Assessee Lawyers: DEVANG GARGIEYA ITP

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES B, JAIPUR JH ,U-DS-LSUH] MIK/;{K ,OA JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 546/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12 SHRI SATISH KUMAR SHARMA, S/O- SHRI DEEN DAYAL SHARMA, 47, JAIN MOHALLA, MOJMABAD, TEHSIL-DUDU, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. I.T.O., WARD-7(3), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO.: CSLPS 8788 P VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 547/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12 SHRI VAIDYA DEEN DAYAL SHARMA, S/O- SHRI BANSIDHAR SHARMA, 47, JAIN MOHALLA, MOJMABAD, TEHSIL-DUDU, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. I.T.O., WARD-7(3), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO.: ACZPS 7275 C VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI DEVANG GARGIEYA (ITP) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : MS. CHANCHAL MEENA (ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 16/09/2020 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 16/09/2020 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: BENCH BOTH THESE APPEALS ARE FILED BY THE TWO DIFFERENT ASSESSEES AGAINST THE TWO SEPARATE ORDERS OF LD. CIT(A)-3, JAIPUR EACH DATED 11/02/2019 FOR THE A.Y. 2011-12. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEALS WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. ITA 546 & 547/JP/2019_ SH. SATISH KR. SHARMA VS ITO & 1 ANR 2 3. THE LD. COUNSEL APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEES MOVED APPLICATIONS TO WITHDRAW THESE APPEALS. THE COMMON CONTENTION IN THE SAID APPLICATIONS READ AS UNDER: THE HEARING OF THE ABOVE MATTER IS FIXED ON 16/09/2020. IN THIS CONNECTION, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT AS INSTRUCTED BY THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CLIENT, IT IS HEREBY PRAYED THAT THE ABOVE APPEAL PLEASE BE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT INASMUCH AS THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED FOR SETTLEMENT UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME-2020 ON 16/03/2020. A FORMAL ORDER, TO THIS EFFECT MAY KINDLY BE PASSED AT AN EARLY DATE AND OBLIGE. 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEES TO WITHDRAW THEIR APPEALS. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSES ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 16 TH SEPTEMBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- LANHI XLKA ,U-DS -LSUH (SANDEEP GOSAIN) (N.K. SAINI) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER MIK/;{K @ VICE PRESIDENT TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 16/09/2020 ITA 546 & 547/JP/2019_ SH. SATISH KR. SHARMA VS ITO & 1 ANR 3 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- (I) SHRI SATISH KUMAR SHARMA, JAIPUR. (II) SHRI VAIDYA DEEN DAYAL SHARMA, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE I.T.O., WARD-7(3), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 546 & 547/JP/2019) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR