M/s Pintoji Foods (P) Ltd., New Delhi V. ITO, New Delhi

ITA 5502/DEL/2010

• Counselvise Citation: 550220114 RSA 2010
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 11 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 14-11-2012
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Next Hearing Date: 14-11-2012
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 06-12-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: PRISELLA GANGEIT

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.P. TOLANI AND SHRI J.S. REDDY ITA NO. 5502/DEL/2010 A.YR. 2007-08 M/S PINTOJI FOODS (P) LTD., VS. INCOME TAX OFFICE R, D-345/A, GALI NO. 19, WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI. BHAJANPURA, DELHI-110053. PAN: AADCP1308C ( APPELLANT ) ( RESPONDENT ) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MS. PRISELLA GANGEIT SR. DR O R D E R PER R.P. TOLANI, J.M: : THIS IS ASSESSEES APPEAL AGAINST CIT(A)S ORDER DATED 29-09-2010 RELATING TO A.Y. 2007-08. 2. NONE PUT IN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE HEARING FIXED FOR 14-11-2012 DESPITE ISSUE OF NOTICE FOR HEARING THROUGH REGISTERED POST. THE POSTAL ENVELOPE CONTAINING THE NOTICE OF HEARIN G HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED UNSERVED. THUS, IT CAN SAFELY BE PRESUMED THAT ASSE SSEE HAS BEEN SERVED WITH NOTICE OF HEARING. NO REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HE ARING HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM ASSESSEE. IT GIVES AN IMPRESSION THAT THE AS SESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING ITS APPEAL. WE, THEREFORE, HAVE NO OPTION BUT TO DISMISS THE APPEAL 2 PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE, PLACING RELIANCE ON THE RATIO OF DECISIONS IN THE FOLLOWING CASES: CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL .); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR 223 ITR 480 (MP). 3. ASSESSEES APPEAL STANDS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 14-11-2012. SD/- SD/- ( J.S. REDDY ) ( R.P. TOLANI ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 14-11-2012. MP COPY TO : 1. ASSESSEE 2. AO 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR 3